| Literature DB >> 33944648 |
Yuki Ong1, Vishal G Shelat1,2,3.
Abstract
Introduction: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common gastrointestinal disease with a wide spectrum of severity and morbidity. Developed in 1974, the Ranson score was the first scoring system to prognosticate AP. Over the past decades, while the Ranson score remains widely used, it was identified to have certain limitations, such as having low predictive power. It has also been criticized for its 48-hour requirement for computation of the final score, which has been argued to potentially delay management. With advancements in our understanding of AP, is the Ranson score still relevant as an effective prognostication system for AP?Areas covered: This review summarizes the available evidence comparing Ranson score with other conventional and novel scoring systems, in terms of prognostic accuracy, benefits, limitations and clinical applicability. It also evaluates the effectiveness of Ranson score with regard to the Revised Atlanta Classification.Expert opinion: The Ranson score consistently exhibits comparable prognostic accuracy to other newer scoring systems, and the 48-hour timeframe for computing the full Ranson score is an inherent strength, not a weakness. These aspects, coupled with relative ease of use, practicality and universality of the score, advocate for the continued relevance of the Ranson score in modern clinical practice.Entities:
Keywords: Acute pancreatitis; Ranson score; mortality; predictor; scoring system; severity
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33944648 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2021.1924058
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol ISSN: 1747-4124 Impact factor: 3.869