| Literature DB >> 33942384 |
Jiafeng Zhang1, Xiaobei Ding1, Xin Zhou1, Wanjun Chen1, Jiaming Yao1, Zhihong Guo1, Lin Chen1, Yan Xia1, Qin Fan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Timely detection of HIV infection is critical for curbing the AIDS epidemic, and building an extensive and effective HIV laboratory network is of great importance. Therefore, improving quality management of the laboratory network and optimizing detection strategies are desirable research issues.Entities:
Keywords: HIV; Pareto principle; laboratory network
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33942384 PMCID: PMC8183946 DOI: 10.1002/jcla.23794
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Lab Anal ISSN: 0887-8013 Impact factor: 2.352
The distribution of HIV laboratories in Zhejiang province in 2014
| Prefectures | Ranks | Institutions | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Confirmatory labs | Screening labs | Testing sites | CDCs | Hospitals | MCCIs | BCSIs | Others | |
| Hangzhou | 2 | 109 | 156 | 14 | 229 | 10 | 1 | 13 |
| Ningbo | 1 | 84 | 22 | 12 | 81 | 8 | 1 | 5 |
| Wenzhou | 1 | 54 | 155 | 12 | 184 | 12 | 2 | 0 |
| Jiaxing | 1 | 46 | 66 | 7 | 99 | 6 | 1 | 0 |
| Huzhou | 1 | 31 | 40 | 4 | 61 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Shaoxing | 1 | 63 | 81 | 7 | 131 | 5 | 1 | 1 |
| Jinhua | 1 | 58 | 78 | 10 | 112 | 8 | 3 | 4 |
| Quzhou | 1 | 32 | 84 | 6 | 98 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| Zhoushan | 1 | 15 | 32 | 5 | 40 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Taizhou | 1 | 49 | 86 | 10 | 112 | 10 | 1 | 3 |
| Lishui | 1 | 37 | 62 | 9 | 80 | 9 | 1 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 578 | 862 | 96 | 1,227 | 79 | 14 | 36 |
FIGURE 1HIV laboratory network in Zhejiang province. Zhejiang province is highlighted on the map of China (left). The provincial confirmatory central laboratory, confirmatory laboratories, screening laboratories, and testing sites are labeled with a solid five‐pointed star (★), solid squares (■), solid upward‐pointing triangles (▲), and solid circles (●), respectively. Different institutional types are labelled with different colors as follows: CDCs (blue), hospitals (purple), BCSIs (red), MCCIs (yellow), and others (black)
Results of HIV antibody screening tests in the laboratory network
| Prefectures | Tests in the network | Reactive specimens | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proportion of labs | Proportion of testing volume | Proportion of labs | Proportion of reactive specimens | |
| Hangzhou | 13.9% (37/267) | 80.7% (1,773,017/2,197,845) | 7.9% (21/267) | 80.1% (2,048/2,557) |
| Ningbo | 30.8% (33/107) | 80.6% (929,328/1,153,423) | 21.5% (23/107) | 80.3% (1,161/1,446) |
| Wenzhou | 16.7% (35/210) | 80.4% (1,008,397/1,254,570) | 9.0% (19/210) | 81.0% (1,378/1,701) |
| Jiaxing | 20.4% (23/113) | 79.8% (571,764/716,897) | 14.2% (16/113) | 80.2% (449/560) |
| Huzhou | 20.8% (15/72) | 81.9% (394,486/481,889) | 18.1% (13/72) | 79.6% (253/318) |
| Shaoxing | 14.5% (21/145) | 80.1% (515,286/643,628) | 10.3% (15/145) | 80.7% (415/514) |
| Jinhua | 21.2% (29/137) | 80.1% (838,690/1,046,446) | 17.5% (24/137) | 80.0% (950/1,187) |
| Quzhou | 17.1% (20/117) | 81.0% (283,018/349,577) | 13.7% (16/117) | 81.3% (165/203) |
| Zhoushan | 18.8% (9/48) | 82.0% (109,852/133,992) | 18.8% (9/48) | 82.4% (70/85) |
| Taizhou | 20.6% (28/136) | 80.4% (632,721/786,485) | 16.9% (23/136) | 81.5% (650/798) |
| Lishui | 21.0% (21/100) | 80.4% (252,041/313,402) | 15.0% (15/100) | 80.4% (201/250) |
| Total | 17.3% (251/1,452) | 80.0% (7,260,940/9,078,154) | 11.7% (170/1,452) | 80.1% (7,702/9,619) |
FIGURE 2Cumulative distribution of the numbers of HIV screening tests and positive screening tests. Each dot represents a laboratory. The laboratories are plotted as the cumulative percentages of the numbers of laboratories on the horizontal axis and the cumulative percentages of numbers of screening tests (A) or positive screening tests (B) on the vertical axis
FIGURE 3Distribution of the numbers of HIV screening tests, positive screening tests, and confirmed positive tests in different categories. The right side coordinates display the cumulative percentages of the numbers of HIV screening tests (A), positive screening tests (B), and confirmed positive tests (C). The digital codes (the same as in Table 3) on the horizontal axes represent specific categories in the screening strategy
HIV screening in subjects from different categories in Zhejiang province
| Prefectures | Numbers of tests | Numbers of positive screening tests | Numbers of confirmed positive tests | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Categories | Proportion of tests | Categories | Proportion of positive tests | Categories | Proportion of positive tests | |
| Hangzhou | ①⑥④⑬⑤ | 83.1% (1,611,658/1,938,758) | ①④⑦③⑬ | 82.6% (1,546/1,871) | ①⑦④③⑳ | 87.7% (957/1,091) |
| Ningbo | ①⑥④⑪⑳ | 81.0% (894,949/1,104,812) | ①⑦④③⑳ | 82.6% (799/967) | ⑦①④③⑳ | 82.1% (468/570) |
| Wenzhou | ①④⑥⑳⑬ | 86.8% (1,010,325/1,164,440) | ④①⑦⑲⑬ | 85.3% (1,079/1,265) | ④⑦①③⑳ | 87.0% (587/675) |
| Jiaxing | ①⑲⑥⑤⑬ | 82.0% (705,381/860,623) | ①④③⑦⑲ | 83.2% (326/392) | ①⑦④③⑲ | 81.8% (225/275) |
| Huzhou | ①⑥⑳④⑲ | 80.0% (428,381/535,453) | ①④⑬⑦③ | 77.4% (226/292) | ①③⑦④⑳ | 85.5% (141/165) |
| Shaoxing | ①⑥⑳②⑬ | 76.7% (522,001/680,963) | ①③②⑬⑦ | 72.7% (328/454) | ①⑦③④⑳ | 68.3% (155/227) |
| Jinhua | ①⑥⑲②④ | 78.9% (889,826/1,127,217) | ①⑦④③⑬ | 77.7% (690/888) | ⑦①④③⑲ | 82.1% (437/532) |
| Quzhou | ①⑥⑤④⑬ | 76.3% (245,255/321,444) | ①⑤⑬③④ | 62.5% (90/144) | ①③⑦⑱④ | 65.2% (60/92) |
| Zhoushan | ①⑥④⑬⑲ | 70.5% (108,922/154,554) | ①⑦④⑲⑭ | 63.2% (48/76) | ①⑦④⑭⑱ | 65.6% (40/61) |
| Taizhou | ①⑥④⑤⑬ | 84.0% (642,086/764,809) | ①⑦④⑳⑬ | 78.1% (550/704) | ①⑦④③⑪ | 78.5% (306/390) |
| Lishui | ①⑥④⑤⑳ | 83.9% (226,582/269,916) | ①④⑥⑦③ | 77.4% (181/234) | ④①⑦⑤③ | 80.6% (108/134) |
| Total | ①⑥④⑬⑤ | 77.2% (6,890,210/8,922,989) | ①④⑦③⑬ | 76.4% (5,570/7,287) | ①⑦④③⑳ | 81.5% (3433/4212) |
① Preoperational patients; ② Blood and blood product recipients; ③ Sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic attendees; ④ Other patients; ⑤ Pre‐marital testing attendees; ⑥ Pregnant women; ⑦ VCT attendees; ⑧ Spouses or sex partners of HIV‐positive individuals; ⑨ Children of positive women; ⑩ People with occupational exposure; ⑪ Employees in entertainment fields; ⑫ Paid blood donors; ⑬ Unpaid blood donors; ⑭ Entry‐exit personnel; ⑮ Recruits; ⑯ Detainees in detoxification and reeducation centers; ⑰ Detainees in female reeducation centers; ⑱ Other detainees; ⑲ Specific survey subjects; ⑳ Others. The code was sorted according to the corresponding numbers of tests from high to low. Only the top five categories are shown in the table.