Literature DB >> 33942352

Design of phase III trials with long-term survival outcomes based on short-term binary results.

Marta Bofill Roig1, Yu Shen2, Guadalupe Gómez Melis1.   

Abstract

Pathologic complete response (pCR) is a common primary endpoint for a phase II trial or even accelerated approval of neoadjuvant cancer therapy. If granted, a two-arm confirmatory trial is often required to demonstrate the efficacy with a time-to-event outcome such as overall survival. However, the design of a subsequent phase III trial based on prior information on the pCR effect is not straightforward. Aiming at designing such phase III trials with overall survival as primary endpoint using pCR information from previous trials, we consider a mixture model that incorporates both the survival and the binary endpoints. We propose to base the comparison between arms on the difference of the restricted mean survival times, and show how the effect size and sample size for overall survival rely on the probability of the binary response and the survival distribution by response status, both for each treatment arm. Moreover, we provide the sample size calculation under different scenarios and accompany them with the R package survmixer where all the computations have been implemented. We evaluate our proposal with a simulation study, and illustrate its application through a neoadjuvant breast cancer trial.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; mixture model; randomized controlled trial; restricted mean survival times; sample size

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33942352      PMCID: PMC8482791          DOI: 10.1002/sim.9018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.497


  19 in total

1.  Association of Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer With Long-Term Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kristine R Broglio; Melanie Quintana; Margaret Foster; Melissa Olinger; Anna McGlothlin; Scott M Berry; Jean-François Boileau; Christine Brezden-Masley; Stephen Chia; Susan Dent; Karen Gelmon; Alexander Paterson; Daniel Rayson; Donald A Berry
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 31.777

2.  Design and monitoring of survival trials based on restricted mean survival times.

Authors:  Xiaodong Luo; Bo Huang; Hui Quan
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Assessment of effect size and power for survival analysis through a binary surrogate endpoint in clinical trials.

Authors:  Judah Abberbock; Stewart Anderson; Priya Rastogi; Gong Tang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Sequential design of phase II-III cancer trials.

Authors:  Tze Leung Lai; Philip W Lavori; Mei-Chiung Shih
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Weighted Kaplan-Meier statistics: a class of distance tests for censored survival data.

Authors:  M S Pepe; T R Fleming
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Comparison of the restricted mean survival time with the hazard ratio in superiority trials with a time-to-event end point.

Authors:  Bo Huang; Pei-Fen Kuan
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 1.894

7.  The Average Hazard Ratio - A Good Effect Measure for Time-to-event Endpoints when the Proportional Hazard Assumption is Violated?

Authors:  Geraldine Rauch; Werner Brannath; Matthias Brückner; Meinhard Kieser
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.176

8.  Joint modeling of binary response and survival for clustered data in clinical trials.

Authors:  Bingshu E Chen; Jia Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  On permutation tests for comparing restricted mean survival time with small sample from randomized trials.

Authors:  Miki Horiguchi; Hajime Uno
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Restricted mean survival time: an alternative to the hazard ratio for the design and analysis of randomized trials with a time-to-event outcome.

Authors:  Patrick Royston; Mahesh K B Parmar
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.