Literature DB >> 33942205

Kinetic and structural parameters governing Fic-mediated adenylylation/AMPylation of the Hsp70 chaperone, BiP/GRP78.

Anwesha Sanyal1, Erica A Zbornik1, Ben G Watson1, Charles Christoffer2, Jia Ma3, Daisuke Kihara1,2, Seema Mattoo4.   

Abstract

Fic (filamentation induced by cAMP) proteins regulate diverse cell signaling events by post-translationally modifying their protein targets, predominantly by the addition of an AMP (adenosine monophosphate). This modification is called Fic-mediated adenylylation or AMPylation. We previously reported that the human Fic protein, HYPE/FicD, is a novel regulator of the unfolded protein response (UPR) that maintains homeostasis in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in response to stress from misfolded proteins. Specifically, HYPE regulates UPR by adenylylating the ER chaperone, BiP/GRP78, which serves as a sentinel for UPR activation. Maintaining ER homeostasis is critical for determining cell fate, thus highlighting the importance of the HYPE-BiP interaction. Here, we study the kinetic and structural parameters that determine the HYPE-BiP interaction. By measuring the binding and kinetic efficiencies of HYPE in its activated (Adenylylation-competent) and wild type (de-AMPylation-competent) forms for BiP in its wild type and ATP-bound conformations, we determine that HYPE displays a nearly identical preference for the wild type and ATP-bound forms of BiP in vitro and preferentially de-AMPylates the wild type form of adenylylated BiP. We also show that AMPylation at BiP's Thr366 versus Thr518 sites differentially affect its ATPase activity, and that HYPE does not adenylylate UPR accessory proteins like J-protein ERdJ6. Using molecular docking models, we explain how HYPE is able to adenylylate Thr366 and Thr518 sites in vitro. While a physiological role for AMPylation at both the Thr366 and Thr518 sites has been reported, our molecular docking model supports Thr518 as the structurally preferred modification site. This is the first such analysis of the HYPE-BiP interaction and offers critical insights into substrate specificity and target recognition.
© 2021. Cell Stress Society International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AMPylation; Adenylylation; BiP/GRP78; ER stress; FicD/HYPE; Hsp70; Post-translational modification; Unfolded protein response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33942205      PMCID: PMC8275707          DOI: 10.1007/s12192-021-01208-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones        ISSN: 1355-8145            Impact factor:   3.667


  43 in total

Review 1.  Potential for protein surface shape analysis using spherical harmonics and 3D Zernike descriptors.

Authors:  Vishwesh Venkatraman; Lee Sael; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 2.194

Review 2.  BiP (GRP78), an essential hsp70 resident protein in the endoplasmic reticulum.

Authors:  I G Haas
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1994-11-30

3.  Predicting Real-Valued Protein Residue Fluctuation Using FlexPred.

Authors:  Lenna Peterson; Michal Jamroz; Andrzej Kolinski; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

4.  Doc toxin is a kinase that inactivates elongation factor Tu.

Authors:  Jonathan W Cruz; Francesca P Rothenbacher; Tatsuya Maehigashi; William S Lane; Christine M Dunham; Nancy A Woychik
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Protein AMPylation by an Evolutionarily Conserved Pseudokinase.

Authors:  Anju Sreelatha; Samantha S Yee; Victor A Lopez; Brenden C Park; Lisa N Kinch; Sylwia Pilch; Kelly A Servage; Junmei Zhang; Jenny Jiou; Monika Karasiewicz-Urbańska; Małgorzata Łobocka; Nick V Grishin; Kim Orth; Roza Kucharczyk; Krzysztof Pawłowski; Diana R Tomchick; Vincent S Tagliabracci
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Human and server docking prediction for CAPRI round 30-35 using LZerD with combined scoring functions.

Authors:  Lenna X Peterson; Hyungrae Kim; Juan Esquivel-Rodriguez; Amitava Roy; Xusi Han; Woong-Hee Shin; Jian Zhang; Genki Terashi; Matt Lee; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-10-14

7.  AMPylation matches BiP activity to client protein load in the endoplasmic reticulum.

Authors:  Steffen Preissler; Cláudia Rato; Ruming Chen; Robin Antrobus; Shujing Ding; Ian M Fearnley; David Ron
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Modulation of Rab GTPase function by a protein phosphocholine transferase.

Authors:  Shaeri Mukherjee; Xiaoyun Liu; Kohei Arasaki; Justin McDonough; Jorge E Galán; Craig R Roy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  FICD acts bifunctionally to AMPylate and de-AMPylate the endoplasmic reticulum chaperone BiP.

Authors:  Steffen Preissler; Claudia Rato; Luke Perera; Vladimir Saudek; David Ron
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 15.369

10.  An oligomeric state-dependent switch in the ER enzyme FICD regulates AMPylation and deAMPylation of BiP.

Authors:  Luke A Perera; Claudia Rato; Yahui Yan; Lisa Neidhardt; Stephen H McLaughlin; Randy J Read; Steffen Preissler; David Ron
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  LZerD Protein-Protein Docking Webserver Enhanced With de novo Structure Prediction.

Authors:  Charles Christoffer; Vijay Bharadwaj; Ryan Luu; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-08-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.