Literature DB >> 33941710

Development and External Validation of Survival Prediction Model for Pancreatic Cancer Using Two Nationwide Database: Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) and Korea Tumor Registry System-Biliary Pancreas (KOTUS-BP).

Jae Seung Kang1, Lydia Mok2, Jin Seok Heo3, In Woong Han3, Sang Hyun Shin3, Yoo-Seok Yoon4, Ho-Seong Han4, Dae Wook Hwang5, Jae Hoon Lee5, Woo Jung Lee6, Sang Jae Park7, Joon Seong Park8, Yonghoon Kim9, Huisong Lee10, Young-Dong Yu11, Jae Do Yang12, Seung Eun Lee13, Il Young Park14, Chi-Young Jeong15, Younghoon Roh16, Seong-Ryong Kim17, Ju Ik Moon18, Sang Kuon Lee19, Hee Joon Kim20, Seungyeoun Lee21, Hongbeom Kim22, Wooil Kwon22, Chang-Sup Lim1, Jin-Young Jang22, Taesung Park2.   

Abstract

Background/Aims: Several prediction models for evaluating the prognosis of nonmetastatic resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have been developed, and their performances were reported to be superior to that of the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. We developed a prediction model to evaluate the prognosis of resected PDAC and externally validated it with data from a nationwide Korean database.
Methods: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database were utilized for model development, and data from the Korea Tumor Registry System-Biliary Pancreas (KOTUS-BP) database were used for external validation. Potential candidate variables for model development were age, sex, histologic differentiation, tumor location, adjuvant chemotherapy, and the AJCC 8th staging system T and N stages. For external validation, the concordance index (C-index) and time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were evaluated.
Results: Between 2004 and 2016, data from 9,624 patients were utilized for model development, and data from 3,282 patients were used for external validation. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, age, sex, tumor location, T and N stages, histologic differentiation, and adjuvant chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for resected PDAC. After an exhaustive search and 10-fold cross validation, the best model was finally developed, which included all prognostic variables. The C-index, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, and 5-year time-dependent AUCs were 0.628, 0.650, 0.665, 0.675, and 0.686, respectively. Conclusions: The survival prediction model for resected PDAC could provide quantitative survival probabilities with reliable performance. External validation studies with other nationwide databases are needed to evaluate the performance of this model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pancreatic neoplasms; Prognosis; Survival

Year:  2021        PMID: 33941710     DOI: 10.5009/gnl20306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut Liver        ISSN: 1976-2283            Impact factor:   4.519


  3 in total

1.  MAFLD Predicts the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Better than NAFLD in Asymptomatic Subjects with Health Check-Ups.

Authors:  Hyoeun Kim; Chan Joo Lee; Byoung Kwon Lee; Seung Up Kim; Jung Il Lee; Sang Hoon Ahn; Kwan Sik Lee; Su Jung Baik
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.487

2.  Clinicopathological Features, Prognostic Factors and Survival in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer Bone Metastasis.

Authors:  Ying Ren; Shicheng Wang; Bo Wu; Zhan Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Comparison of survival prediction models for pancreatic cancer: Cox model versus machine learning models.

Authors:  Hyunsuk Kim; Taesung Park; Jinyoung Jang; Seungyeoun Lee
Journal:  Genomics Inform       Date:  2022-06-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.