Gayatri Yadav1, Raja Narayanan2, Amithavikram R Hathibelagal1. 1. Brien Holden Institute of Optometry and Vision Science, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India. 2. Smt Kanuri Santhamma Centre for Vitreoretinal Diseases, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Abstract
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Red-green chromatic sensitivity and photopic (cone-mediated) flicker sensitivity showed marked improvement after anti-VEGF treatment. The use of flicker and chromatic sensitivities as potential functional tests to monitor treatment outcomes in age-related macular degeneration highlights the clinical importance. BACKGROUND: High-contrast visual acuity (VA) is not a sensitive clinical marker in the management of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Therefore, flicker and chromatic sensitivity changes were assessed following anti-VEGF treatment in subjects with neovascular AMD. METHODS: Subjects diagnosed with neovascular AMD were recruited. VA was measured using a COMPlog chart. Flicker (in central 5°) and chromatic thresholds (red-green and yellow-blue) were measured using Flicker-plus test and Colour Assessment and Diagnosis (CAD) tests, respectively. Baseline thresholds and foveal thickness were measured on the same day, just before anti-VEGF injection delivery and 5 weeks ± 5 days later. RESULTS: Thirteen subjects (8 males, 5 females) with a mean age of 67.5 ± 8.2 years completed the study. Median VA was not significantly different post-treatment (0.57 logMAR [~6/22: Snellen equivalent], IQR: 0.33) compared to baseline (0.56 logMAR, IQR: 0.33), Wilcoxon matched-pair test, p = 0.55). Median Red-Green thresholds improved significantly post-treatment (22.15 CAD units, IQR: 26.06, n = 9), compared to baseline (24.24 CAD units, IQR: 26.21, p = 0.02). Median photopic and mesopic FMT did not show significant change post treatment compared to baseline (p > 0.01, statistical significance of p-value corrected for multiple comparisons was set to 0.01). Similarly, the foveal thickness was not significantly different at post-treatment visit than baseline (p = 0.53). CONCLUSION: Red/green sensitivity recovered better than yellow/blue sensitivity, thus, providing insight into recovery mechanisms in AMD and usefulness of these tests as clinical markers in the management of AMD.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Red-green chromatic sensitivity and photopic (cone-mediated) flicker sensitivity showed marked improvement after anti-VEGF treatment. The use of flicker and chromatic sensitivities as potential functional tests to monitor treatment outcomes in age-related macular degeneration highlights the clinical importance. BACKGROUND: High-contrast visual acuity (VA) is not a sensitive clinical marker in the management of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Therefore, flicker and chromatic sensitivity changes were assessed following anti-VEGF treatment in subjects with neovascular AMD. METHODS: Subjects diagnosed with neovascular AMD were recruited. VA was measured using a COMPlog chart. Flicker (in central 5°) and chromatic thresholds (red-green and yellow-blue) were measured using Flicker-plus test and Colour Assessment and Diagnosis (CAD) tests, respectively. Baseline thresholds and foveal thickness were measured on the same day, just before anti-VEGF injection delivery and 5 weeks ± 5 days later. RESULTS: Thirteen subjects (8 males, 5 females) with a mean age of 67.5 ± 8.2 years completed the study. Median VA was not significantly different post-treatment (0.57 logMAR [~6/22: Snellen equivalent], IQR: 0.33) compared to baseline (0.56 logMAR, IQR: 0.33), Wilcoxon matched-pair test, p = 0.55). Median Red-Green thresholds improved significantly post-treatment (22.15 CAD units, IQR: 26.06, n = 9), compared to baseline (24.24 CAD units, IQR: 26.21, p = 0.02). Median photopic and mesopic FMT did not show significant change post treatment compared to baseline (p > 0.01, statistical significance of p-value corrected for multiple comparisons was set to 0.01). Similarly, the foveal thickness was not significantly different at post-treatment visit than baseline (p = 0.53). CONCLUSION: Red/green sensitivity recovered better than yellow/blue sensitivity, thus, providing insight into recovery mechanisms in AMD and usefulness of these tests as clinical markers in the management of AMD.