Maia Osborne-Grinter1, Mohit Arora2, Chandrasekaran Kaliaperumal2, Pasquale Gallo3. 1. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Maia.osbornegrinter@gmail.com. 2. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. 3. Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The best surgical treatment for adult Chiari malformation type 1 remains widely debated. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of posterior fossa decompression and duraplasty with arachnoid preservation compared with arachnoid dissection for the treatment of adult Chiari malformation type 1. METHODS: Two reviewers (M.O.-G. and M.A.) performed a PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase literature search using the following terms: ("Chiari" OR "Chiari 1") AND ("duraplasty" OR "arachnoid preservation" OR "arachnoid spar∗" OR "posterior fossa surgery" OR "posterior fossa decompression" OR "foramen magnum decompression"). Studies assessing the efficacy of posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty for the treatment of patients aged >18 years with Chiari malformation type 1 were included. Case reports with <10 patients, editorials, and non-English studies were excluded. RESULTS: Of 195 studies identified, 24 were included for meta-analysis. In the 1006 participants, there was no difference in postoperative clinical or radiologic improvement between the 2 techniques. Patients who underwent posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty and arachnoid dissection had a greater prevalence of total complications (0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.29 vs. 0.09, 95% CI, 0.05-0.14; Q = 6.47; P = 0.01) and cerebrospinal fluid-related complications (0.15, 95% CI, 0.10-0.22 vs. 0.05, 95% CI, 0.02-0.12; Q = 4.88; P = 0.03) compared with arachnoid preservation. Furthermore, the prevalence of reoperation in the arachnoid dissection group was 25 times greater than in the arachnoid preservation group (0.08, 95% CI, 0.06-0.10 vs. 0.003, 95% CI, 0.00-0.02; Q = 10.73; P > 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Posterior fossa decompression and duraplasty with arachnoid preservation is a beneficial technique to treat Chiari malformation type 1 and reduces the risk of complications, particularly cerebrospinal fluid-related complications and the rate of reoperation.
BACKGROUND: The best surgical treatment for adult Chiari malformation type 1 remains widely debated. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of posterior fossa decompression and duraplasty with arachnoid preservation compared with arachnoid dissection for the treatment of adult Chiari malformation type 1. METHODS: Two reviewers (M.O.-G. and M.A.) performed a PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase literature search using the following terms: ("Chiari" OR "Chiari 1") AND ("duraplasty" OR "arachnoid preservation" OR "arachnoid spar∗" OR "posterior fossa surgery" OR "posterior fossa decompression" OR "foramen magnum decompression"). Studies assessing the efficacy of posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty for the treatment of patients aged >18 years with Chiari malformation type 1 were included. Case reports with <10 patients, editorials, and non-English studies were excluded. RESULTS: Of 195 studies identified, 24 were included for meta-analysis. In the 1006 participants, there was no difference in postoperative clinical or radiologic improvement between the 2 techniques. Patients who underwent posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty and arachnoid dissection had a greater prevalence of total complications (0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.29 vs. 0.09, 95% CI, 0.05-0.14; Q = 6.47; P = 0.01) and cerebrospinal fluid-related complications (0.15, 95% CI, 0.10-0.22 vs. 0.05, 95% CI, 0.02-0.12; Q = 4.88; P = 0.03) compared with arachnoid preservation. Furthermore, the prevalence of reoperation in the arachnoid dissection group was 25 times greater than in the arachnoid preservation group (0.08, 95% CI, 0.06-0.10 vs. 0.003, 95% CI, 0.00-0.02; Q = 10.73; P > 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Posterior fossa decompression and duraplasty with arachnoid preservation is a beneficial technique to treat Chiari malformation type 1 and reduces the risk of complications, particularly cerebrospinal fluid-related complications and the rate of reoperation.
Authors: Omar F Jbarah; Bahaa I Aburayya; Ayman R Shatnawi; Mohab A Alkhasoneh; Ahmad A Toubasi; Sondos M Alharahsheh; Saleem K Nukho; Asil S Nassar; Mohammad A Jamous Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2022-10-01 Impact factor: 2.800