Literature DB >> 33939661

Recurrence Patterns After Surgical Resection of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Analysis From the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Oncology Outcomes Database.

Hilary Chan1, Li Zhang1, Michael A Choti2, Matthew Kulke3, James C Yao4, Eric K Nakakura1, Mark Bloomston5, Al B Benson6, Manisha H Shah5, Jonathan R Strosberg7, Emily K Bergsland1, Katherine Van Loon1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs) recommend complete (R0) surgical resection of the primary tumor and metastases, if feasible. However, large multicenter studies of recurrence patterns of GEPNETs after resection have not been performed.
METHODS: Patients 18 years or older who presented to 7 participating National Comprehensive Cancer Network institutions between 2004 and 2008 with a new diagnosis of a small bowel, pancreas, or colon/rectum neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and underwent R0 resection of the primary tumor, and synchronous metastases, if present, were included in this analysis. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to calculate recurrence rates and time-associated end points, respectively.
RESULTS: Of 294 patients with GEPNETs, 50% were male, 88% were White, and 99% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1. The median age was 55 years (range, 20-90). The median follow-up time from R0 resection was 62.1 months. Recurrence rates were 18% in small bowel NETs (n = 110), 26% in pancreatic NETs (n = 141), and 10% in colon/rectum NETs (n = 50). The frequency of surveillance imaging was highly variable.
CONCLUSIONS: R0 resection was associated with variable risk of recurrence across subtypes. Further research to inform refinement of guidelines for the appropriate duration of surveillance after R0 resection is needed.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33939661      PMCID: PMC8097723          DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pancreas        ISSN: 0885-3177            Impact factor:   3.243


  23 in total

Review 1.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Tumors: follow-up and documentation.

Authors:  Rudolf Arnold; Yuan-Jia Chen; Frederico Costa; Massimo Falconi; David Gross; Ashley B Grossman; Rudolf Hyrdel; Beata Kos-Kudła; Ramon Salazar; Ursula Plöckinger
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.914

3.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  Appropriate Use Criteria for Somatostatin Receptor PET Imaging in Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Thomas A Hope; Emily K Bergsland; Murat Fani Bozkurt; Michael Graham; Anthony P Heaney; Ken Herrmann; James R Howe; Matthew H Kulke; Pamela L Kunz; Josh Mailman; Lawrence May; David C Metz; Corina Millo; Sue O'Dorisio; Diane L Reidy-Lagunes; Michael C Soulen; Jonathan R Strosberg
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Long-term survival after surgical management of neuroendocrine hepatic metastases.

Authors:  Evan S Glazer; Jennifer F Tseng; Waddah Al-Refaie; Carmen C Solorzano; Ping Liu; Katherine A Willborn; Eddie K Abdalla; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Steven A Curley
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Surgical treatment of neuroendocrine metastases to the liver: a plea for resection to increase survival.

Authors:  Juan M Sarmiento; Glenroy Heywood; Joseph Rubin; Duane M Ilstrup; David M Nagorney; Florencia G Que
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 7.  One hundred years after "carcinoid": epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States.

Authors:  James C Yao; Manal Hassan; Alexandria Phan; Cecile Dagohoy; Colleen Leary; Jeannette E Mares; Eddie K Abdalla; Jason B Fleming; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Asif Rashid; Douglas B Evans
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Clinical presentation, recurrence, and survival in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: results from a prospective institutional database.

Authors:  Monica Ter-Minassian; Jennifer A Chan; Susanne M Hooshmand; Lauren K Brais; Anastassia Daskalova; Rachel Heafield; Laurie Buchanan; Zhi Rong Qian; Charles S Fuchs; Xihong Lin; David C Christiani; Matthew H Kulke
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 5.678

9.  Prognostic factors of long-term outcome in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

Authors:  Ulrich-Frank Pape; Uta Berndt; Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn; Michael Böhmig; Stephanie Roll; Martin Koch; Stefan N Willich; Bertram Wiedenmann
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 5.678

10.  Differences in survival for patients with resectable versus unresectable metastases from pancreatic islet cell cancer.

Authors:  Michael G House; John L Cameron; Keith D Lillemoe; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; Donna E Hansel; Ralph H Hruban; Anirban Maitra; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  1 in total

1.  Surgical Treatment of Patients with Poorly Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: An NCDB Analysis.

Authors:  Sarah R Kaslow; Gerardo A Vitiello; Katherine Prendergast; Leena Hani; Steven M Cohen; Christopher Wolfgang; Russell S Berman; Ann Y Lee; Camilo Correa-Gallego
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 5.344

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.