Literature DB >> 33939481

In suspected SARS-CoV-2, rapid antigen detection tests had 67% to 73% sensitivity and 98% to 100% specificity.

Steven D Stovitz1.   

Abstract

SOURCE CITATION: Favresse J, Gillot C, Oliveira M, et al. Head-to-head comparison of rapid and automated antigen detection tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. J Clin Med. 2021;10:265. 33450853.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID： 33939481     DOI： 10.7326/ACPJ202105180-056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN： 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  2 in total

1.  Accuracy of novel antigen rapid diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: A living systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lukas E Brümmer; Stephan Katzenschlager; Mary Gaeddert; Christian Erdmann; Stephani Schmitz; Marc Bota; Maurizio Grilli; Jan Larmann; Markus A Weigand; Nira R Pollock; Aurélien Macé; Sergio Carmona; Stefano Ongarello; Jilian A Sacks; Claudia M Denkinger
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 11.069

2.  Multi-site clinical validation of Isothermal Amplification based SARS-COV-2 detection assays using different sampling strategies.

Authors:  Kanan T Desai; Karla Alfaro; Laura Mendoza; Matthew Faron; Brian Mesich; Mauricio Maza; Rhina Dominguez; Adriana Valenzuela; Chyntia Díaz Acosta; Magaly Martínez; Juan C Felix; Rachel Masch; Sofia Gabrilovich; Michael Plump; Akiva P Novetsky; Mark H Einstein; Nataki C Douglas; Miriam Cremer; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2021-07-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.