Literature DB >> 33939062

Mapping Unobserved Item-Respondent Interactions: A Latent Space Item Response Model with Interaction Map.

Minjeong Jeon1, Ick Hoon Jin2, Michael Schweinberger3, Samuel Baugh4.   

Abstract

Classic item response models assume that all items with the same difficulty have the same response probability among all respondents with the same ability. These assumptions, however, may very well be violated in practice, and it is not straightforward to assess whether these assumptions are violated, because neither the abilities of respondents nor the difficulties of items are observed. An example is an educational assessment where unobserved heterogeneity is present, arising from unobserved variables such as cultural background and upbringing of students, the quality of mentorship and other forms of emotional and professional support received by students, and other unobserved variables that may affect response probabilities. To address such violations of assumptions, we introduce a novel latent space model which assumes that both items and respondents are embedded in an unobserved metric space, with the probability of a correct response decreasing as a function of the distance between the respondent's and the item's position in the latent space. The resulting latent space approach provides an interaction map that represents interactions of respondents and items, and helps derive insightful diagnostic information on items as well as respondents. In practice, such interaction maps enable teachers to detect students from underrepresented groups who need more support than other students. We provide empirical evidence to demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed latent space approach, along with simulation results.
© 2021. The Psychometric Society.

Keywords:  bipartite network; interaction map; interactions; item response data; latent space model; network model

Year:  2021        PMID: 33939062     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-021-09762-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  1 in total

1.  The saltus model applied to proportional reasoning data.

Authors:  Karen Draney
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2007
  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  Analyzing differences between parent- and self-report measures with a latent space approach.

Authors:  Dongyoung Go; Minjeong Jeon; Saebyul Lee; Ick Hoon Jin; Hae-Jeong Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Modeling Psychometric Relational Data in Social Networks: Latent Interdependence Models.

Authors:  Bo Hu; Jonathan Templin; Lesa Hoffman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-07

Review 3.  Recent Integrations of Latent Variable Network Modeling With Psychometric Models.

Authors:  Selena Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.