Literature DB >> 33939010

Extremity Tourniquet Training at High Seas.

Carlos Yánez Benítez1, Marcelo A F Ribeiro2, Mansoor Khan3, Teófilo Lorente-Aznar4, Esther Asensio5, José Antonio López6, Isabel Martínez6, Juan L Blas7, Antonio Güemes8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Future navy officers require unique training for emergency medical response in the isolated maritime environment. The authors issued a workshop on extremity bleeding control, using four different commercial extremity tourniquets onboard a training sail ship. The purposes were to assess participants' perceptions of this educational experience and evaluate self-application simplicity while navigating on high seas.
METHODS: A descriptive observational study was conducted as part of a workshop issued to volunteer training officers. A post-workshop survey collected their perceptions about the workshops' content usefulness and adequacy, tourniquet safety, self-application simplicity, and device preference. Tourniquet preference was measured by frequency count while the rest of the studied variables on a one-to-ten Likert scale. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for the studied variables, and application simplicity means compared using the ANOVA test (p < 0.05).
RESULTS: Fifty-one Spanish training naval officers, aged 20 or 21, perceived high sea workshop content's usefulness, adequacy, and safety level at 8.6/10, 8.7/10, and 7.5/10, respectively. As for application simplicity, CAT and SAM-XT were rated equally with a mean of 8.5, followed by SWAT (7.9) and RATS (6.9), this one statistically different from the rest (p < 0.01). Windlass types were preferred by 94%.
CONCLUSIONS: The training sail ship's extremity bleeding control workshop was perceived as useful and its content adequate by the participating midshipmen. Windlass types were regarded as easier to apply than elastic counterparts. They were also preferred by nine out of every ten participants.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33939010     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06149-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  13 in total

1.  ABC to <C>ABC: redefining the military trauma paradigm.

Authors:  T J Hodgetts; P F Mahoney; M Q Russell; M Byers
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Skills required for maritime pre-hospital emergency care.

Authors:  Adrian Mellor
Journal:  J R Nav Med Serv       Date:  2012

3.  Performance improvement in emergency tourniquet use during the Baghdad surge.

Authors:  John F Kragh; Dorothy F Beebe; Michelle L O'Neill; Alec C Beekley; Michael A Dubick; David G Baer; Lorne H Blackbourne
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 2.469

4.  Doctor on board? What is the optimal skill-mix in military pre-hospital care?

Authors:  Philip Calderbank; Tom Woolley; Stuart Mercer; Jason Schrager; Mike Kazel; Stephen Bree; Douglas M Bowley
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Surgery at Sea: Exploring the Training Gap for Isolated Military Surgeons.

Authors:  Matthew D Nealeigh; Walter B Kucera; Matthew J Bradley; Elliot M Jessie; W Brian Sweeney; E Matthew Ritter; Carlos J Rodriguez
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 2.891

6.  From the battlefield to main street: Tourniquet acceptance, use, and translation from the military to civilian settings.

Authors:  Tress Goodwin; Krista N Moore; Jason David Pasley; Ruben Troncoso; Matthew J Levy; Craig Goolsby
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.313

7.  Tourniquet use in combat trauma: UK military experience.

Authors:  Steven Brodie; Timothy J Hodgetts; Jo Ollerton; Judith McLeod; Paul Lambert; Peter Mahoney
Journal:  J R Army Med Corps       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.285

8.  Forward assessment of 79 prehospital battlefield tourniquets used in the current war.

Authors:  David R King; Gwendolyn M van der Wilden; John F Kragh; Lorne H Blackbourne
Journal:  J Spec Oper Med       Date:  2012

Review 9.  Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2017 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group.

Authors:  Richard P G Ten Broek; Pepijn Krielen; Salomone Di Saverio; Federico Coccolini; Walter L Biffl; Luca Ansaloni; George C Velmahos; Massimo Sartelli; Gustavo P Fraga; Michael D Kelly; Frederick A Moore; Andrew B Peitzman; Ari Leppaniemi; Ernest E Moore; Johannes Jeekel; Yoram Kluger; Michael Sugrue; Zsolt J Balogh; Cino Bendinelli; Ian Civil; Raul Coimbra; Mark De Moya; Paula Ferrada; Kenji Inaba; Rao Ivatury; Rifat Latifi; Jeffry L Kashuk; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Ron Maier; Sandro Rizoli; Boris Sakakushev; Thomas Scalea; Kjetil Søreide; Dieter Weber; Imtiaz Wani; Fikri M Abu-Zidan; Nicola De'Angelis; Frank Piscioneri; Joseph M Galante; Fausto Catena; Harry van Goor
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.