| Literature DB >> 33938912 |
Neringa Jurkute1,2, Priya D Shanmugarajah3, Marios Hadjivassiliou3, Jenny Higgs4, Miodrag Vojcic5, Iain Horrocks6, Yann Nadjar7, Valerie Touitou8,9, Guy Lenaers10, Roy Poh11, James Acheson1,12, Anthony G Robson1,2, F Lucy Raymond13,14, Mary M Reilly15, Patrick Yu-Wai-Man1,2,16,17, Anthony T Moore1,2,18, Andrew R Webster1,2, Gavin Arno1,2,19.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to report retinal dystrophy as a novel clinical feature and expand the ocular phenotype in patients harboring biallelic candidate FDXR variants.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33938912 PMCID: PMC8107637 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.62.6.2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ISSN: 0146-0404 Impact factor: 4.799
Figure 1.Pedigrees of families. An arrow indicates proband. Shaded shape represents affected individual. Asterisk (*) indicates families without retinal dystrophy.
FDXR Genotypes Identified in Our Cohort
| Family | Affected | HGVs | HGVp | Segregation | gnomAD Version 3.1 (MAF) | Domain | In Silico: Polyphen-2, Mutation Taster | ClinVAr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family 1(GC 21294) | 1 | c.577C>Tc.1115C>A | p.(Arg193Cys)p.(Pro372His) | Both variants present in affected;Paternal DNA unavailable;Maternal: p.(Arg193Cys) | 0.0000065730.0001315 | FAD/NAD(P) BDFAD/NAD(P) BD | Possibly damaging; disease causingProbably damaging; disease causing | –– |
| Family 2(GC 17577) | 2 | c. 925C>Tc.1115C>A | p.(Arg309*) | Both variants present in affected;Paternal: p.(Arg309*)Maternal: p.(Pro372His) | 0.000026280.00001315 | FAD/NAD(P) BDFAD/NAD(P) BD | Disease causingPossibly damaging; disease causing | Likely pathogenic– |
| Family 3(GC 15689) | 1 | c.461C>Tc.823C>T | p.(Ala154Val)p.(Arg275Trp) | Both variants present in affected;Paternal DNA unavailable;Maternal: p.(Arg275Trp) | 00 | FAD/NAD(P) BDFAD/NAD(P) BD | Probably damaging; disease causingProbably damaging; disease causing | –– |
| Family 4 | 1 | c.1115C>Ac.1279G>C | p.(Pro372His)p.(Ala427Pro) | Both variants present in affected;Paternal: p.(Ala427Pro)Maternal DNA unavailable; | 0.000013150 | FAD/NAD(P) BDNAD(P) BD | Possibly damaging; disease causingBenign, polymorphism | –– |
| Family 5(GC 28630) | 1 | c.614C>Tc.823C>T | p.(Thr205Met)p.(Arg275Trp) | Both variants present in affected;Sibling II:1: no variants present;Sibling II:2: p.(Thr205Met);Sibling II:3: no variants present; | 0.000013140 | FAD/NAD(P) BDFAD/NAD(P) BD | Probably damaging; disease causingProbably damaging; disease causing | –– |
| Family 6(GC 28579) | 1 | c.1115C>A | p.(Pro372His) | No other DNA available | 0.000013150 | FAD/NAD(P) BDWhole gene deletion | Possibly damaging; disease causing | –– |
| (chr17:74818633 – 74888183del) | ||||||||
| Family 7(GC 28550) | 2 | c.1115C>Ac.1189G>A | p.(Pro372His)p.(Gly397Ser) | Both variants present in affected;Paternal DNA unavailable;Maternal: p.(Gly397Ser) | 0.000013150.00003285 | FAD/NAD(P) BDNAD(P) BD | Possibly damaging; disease causingProbably damaging; disease causing | –– |
| Family 8 | 1 | c.724C>Tc.916C>T | p.(Arg242Trp) | Both variants present in affected;No other DNA available | 0.0000065730.00004600 | FAD/NAD(P) BDFAD/NAD(P) BD | Probably damaging; disease causingBenign, disease causing | –Likely pathogenic |
All variants reported by using NM_024417.4 nomenclature.
FAD/NAD(P) BD - binding domain; NAD(P) BD.
Figure 2.(A) Schematic diagram of the ferredoxin reductase protein. Domains are indicated by different shading. The identified variants are indicated on the right side of the bar at the corresponding positions. (B) A visualization of a large deletion spanning the two 3′ exons of TNEM104, FDXR, GRIN2C, and the four 3′ exons of FADS6 identified in one individual from family 6 using the Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV). (C) Multiple alignment of ferredoxin reductase orthologues. All mutated sites are strictly conserved in diverse species.
Phenotypic Features and Systemic Manifestation of Affected Individuals
| Family 1 | Family 2 | Family 3 | Family 4 | Family 5 | Family 6 | Family 7 | Family 8 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | M | M | M | M | M | F | M | M | F | F |
| Age of initial presentation | 3 y | 4 y | 14 y | 7 y | 22 y | 40s | Childhood | 2.5 years | 3.5 y | 42 y |
|
| ||||||||||
| Age of examination | 11 y | 11 y | 14 y | 26 y | 25 y | 45 y | 7 y | 26 y | 10 | 42 y |
| Optic atrophy | Yes (3) | Yes (11) | Yes (14) | Yes (7) | Yes (25) | Yes (40s) | Yes (>7) | Yes (7) | Yes (3.5) | Yes (42) |
| Retinal dystrophy | No | Yes (4) | Yes (14) | Yes (7) | No | No | Yes (7) | Yes (7) | Yes (3.5) | Possible |
| Macula edema | No | Yes (5) | No | No | No | No | No | Yes (17) | No | No |
| Retinal vessels attenuation | No | Yes (11) | Yes (14) | Yes (8) | No | No | No | Yes (ND) | No | No |
| Cataract | No | Yes (11) | No | Yes (18) | No | No | Yes (17 to 18) | No | No | No |
| Nystagmus | Yes (3) | No | No | Yes (14) | No | No | Yes (>7) | No | No | No |
| Squint | Yes (3) | No | No | Yes (16) | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Latest BCVA | HM | LP | 0.06 and 0.1 | HM and LP | CF and 6/36 | 6/36 and 6/24 | ND | 6/12 and 6/18 | 6/36 | ND |
| Constricted visual field | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | ND | Yes | Yes | ND |
| Nyctalopia | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | ND | ND | ND | ND |
|
| No | Yes (11) | Yes (late teens) | Yes (20) | No | Yes (40s) | No | No | No | Yes (42) |
|
| ||||||||||
| Ataxia/balance problems | Yes (11) | Yes (late teens) | Yes (late teens) | No | No | Yes (40s) | Yes (childhood) | Yes (2.5) | Yes (15) | Yes (42) |
| Sensory neuropathy | No | Yes (late teens) | Yes (late teens) | No | Yes (22) | Yes (40s) | Yes (childhood) | No | No | Yes (42) |
| Motor neuropathy | No | Yes (late teens) | Yes (late teens) | No | Yes (22) | Yes (40s) | No | No | No | Yes (42) |
| Dizziness | Yes (11) | No | No | Yes (late teens) | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Tremor | Yes (12) | No | No | Yes (15) | No | No | No | No | No | No |
Age of onset indicated in years in brackets.
F, female; M, male; BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; HM, hand motions; LP, light perception; CF, counting fingers; ND, no data.
Figure 3.(A) – Electrophysiological recordings from right eye (RE) and left eye (LE) of the proband in family 1, the younger sibling from family 2 and from one eye of an unaffected control subject (N) for comparison. The flash ERGs and large field pattern ERGs were recorded using lower eyelid skin electrodes at the age of 3-years (proband family 1) or 5 years (younger sibling; family 2); flash VEPs (FVEP) were recorded in the 3-year-old and repeated with additional pattern reversal VEPs (PVEP) at the age of 11 years. The ERGs and PERG P50 component in the proband of family 1 are normal but the abnormal PERG N95:P50 ratio, abnormal PVEP and progressively abnormal flash VEPs are consistent with bilateral retinal ganglion cell/optic nerve dysfunction. The younger sibling in family 2 has undetectable ERGs and PERG, in keeping with severe rod and cone photoreceptor function with severe macular involvement. (B) International standard full-field ERGs and pattern ERGs from the right eye (RE) and left eye (LE) of the 14-year-old proband in family 2 and from an unaffected control subject (N) for comparison. The recordings were obtained using gold foil corneal electrodes and show ERG evidence of a rod-cone dystrophy with PERG P50 reduction consistent with relatively mild macular involvement.
Figure 4.Multimodal imaging of affected individuals from family 2, family 3, and family 8. (A) Fundus color photographs, Optos wide-angle upper panels (family 8) show retinal pigmentary changes in the far periphery (nasal to the disc). Topcon low panels show optic atrophy and retinal vessel attenuation in family 2 II-1, II-2 and family 3. (B) Heidelberg Spectralis autofluorescence images (30 degree upper 4 panels, 55 degrees lower 2 panels). Both family 2 II-1 and family 3 show hyperautofluorescent rings (of Robson) delineating preservation of the central, outer retinal structure (see C). (C) SD-OCT imaging of individuals from family 2 showing in family 2 II-1 preserved ellipsoid and outer nuclear layer only within the autofluorescent ring (see B). In family 2 II-2, there is greater loss of outer retina with some visible ellipsoid centrally, as well as significant macular oedema. The overall retinal thickness is significantly reduced.
Haplotype Reconstruction for Individuals Carrying c.1115C>A, p.(Pro372His) Variant
|
|
Haplotypes were reconstructed using WGS datasets (NIHR-RD and 100KGP study).
c.1115C>A, p.(Pro372His) variant. # undetermined single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). Shaded haplotype is shared. Underlined individuals are c.1115C>A, p.(Pro372His) variant carriers.