Literature DB >> 33938304

Efficacy and safety data for the Ab interno XEN45 gel stent implant at 3 Years: A retrospective analysis.

Itay E Gabbay1,2, Mordechai Goldberg1, Felicity Allen1, Zhiheng Lin1, Christine Morley1, Tahmina Pearsall3, Veena Muraleedharan1, Simon Ruben1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report efficacy and safety measures of the XEN45 gel stent at 36 months in the UK National Health Service setting.
METHODS: Retrospective non-comparative audit of the records of patients who underwent XEN45 implantation between June 2015 and May 2017 was performed. Main outcome measures were intraocular pressure and number of antihypertensive medications used. Failure was defined as need for further surgery or stent removal. Success was defined as a 20% decrease in intraocular pressure without the need for additional glaucoma medications or a reduction in antihypertensive medications without an increase in baseline intraocular pressure. Needling rates and preoperative factors effect were assessed.
RESULTS: The cohort included 205 patients (205 eyes) with primary open angle glaucoma (84.4%), angle closure glaucoma (7.8%), or refractory glaucoma (7.8%), 62.9% had a stand-alone procedure and 37.1%, a combined phaco-XEN45 procedure. Mean intraocular pressure was 22.6 ± 7.0 mmHg at baseline compared to 14.7 ± 3.8 mmHg at 24 months and 14.0 ± 2.9 mmHg at 36 months (p < 0.001 for both). Mean number of medications used was 2.6 ± 1.1 at baseline compared to 0.5 ± 0.9 and 0.6 ± 1.0, at 24- and 36-months, respectively (p < 0.001 for both). The failure rate at 36 months was 25%. Needling was required in 36.6%. Evaluation of background factors yielded an increased failure rate in non-Caucasians compared to Caucasians (74% vs 21%, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: XEN45 implantation is effective and safe at 36 months' follow-up. Patients should be advised regarding the risk of failure and possible need for bleb revisions. Careful patient selection may be required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  XEN; glaucoma; minimally invasive; open angle; surgery

Year:  2021        PMID: 33938304     DOI: 10.1177/11206721211014381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1120-6721            Impact factor:   2.597


  4 in total

1.  Glaucoma Medication and Quality of Life after Phacoemulsification Combined with a Xen Gel Stent.

Authors:  Christian Pahljina; Stephanie Sarny; Lukas Hoeflechner; Thomas Falb; Gernot Schliessleder; Marlene Lindner; Domagoj Ivastinovic; Kaweh Mansouri; Ewald Lindner
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  The Outcomes of XEN Gel Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xuan-Zhu Chen; Zhi-Qiao Liang; Kang-Yi Yang; Kun Lv; Yao Ma; Meng-Yang Li; Hui-Juan Wu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-04

3.  Predictability of success and open conjunctival revision rates in the subsequent eye after XEN45 Gel Stent implantation according to lens status.

Authors:  D Kiessling; C Rennings; M Hild; A Lappas; T S Dietlein; G F Roessler; R A Widder
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  Impact of failed ab-interno trabeculectomy (trabectome) on subsequent XEN45 gel stent implantation in pseudophakic eyes.

Authors:  D Kiessling; C Rennings; M Hild; A Lappas; T S Dietlein; G F Roessler; Randolf Alexander Widder
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 2.031

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.