Literature DB >> 33937842

Convolutional Neural Networks for Automated PET/CT Detection of Diseased Lymph Node Burden in Patients with Lymphoma.

Amy J Weisman1, Minnie W Kieler1, Scott B Perlman1, Martin Hutchings1, Robert Jeraj1, Lale Kostakoglu1, Tyler J Bradshaw1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To automatically detect lymph nodes involved in lymphoma on fluorine 18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT images using convolutional neural networks (CNNs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, baseline disease of 90 patients with lymphoma was segmented on 18F-FDG PET/CT images (acquired between 2005 and 2011) by a nuclear medicine physician. An ensemble of three-dimensional patch-based, multiresolution pathway CNNs was trained using fivefold cross-validation. Performance was assessed using the true-positive rate (TPR) and number of false-positive (FP) findings. CNN performance was compared with agreement between physicians by comparing the annotations of a second nuclear medicine physician to the first reader in 20 of the patients. Patient TPR was compared using Wilcoxon signed rank tests.
RESULTS: Across all 90 patients, a range of 0-61 nodes per patient was detected. At an average of four FP findings per patient, the method achieved a TPR of 85% (923 of 1087 nodes). Performance varied widely across patients (TPR range, 33%-100%; FP range, 0-21 findings). In the 20 patients labeled by both physicians, a range of 1-49 nodes per patient was detected and labeled. The second reader identified 96% (210 of 219) of nodes with an additional 3.7 per patient compared with the first reader. In the same 20 patients, the CNN achieved a 90% (197 of 219) TPR at 3.7 FP findings per patient.
CONCLUSION: An ensemble of three-dimensional CNNs detected lymph nodes at a performance nearly comparable to differences between two physicians' annotations. This preliminary study is a first step toward automated PET/CT assessment for lymphoma.© RSNA, 2020. 2020 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33937842      PMCID: PMC8082306          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2020200016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  22 in total

Review 1.  When should FDG-PET be used in the modern management of lymphoma?

Authors:  Sally Fiona Barrington; Nabegh George Mikhaeel
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 6.998

2.  A new 2.5D representation for lymph node detection using random sets of deep convolutional neural network observations.

Authors:  Holger R Roth; Le Lu; Ari Seff; Kevin M Cherry; Joanne Hoffman; Shijun Wang; Jiamin Liu; Evrim Turkbey; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2014

3.  Multi-stage thresholded region classification for whole-body PET-CT lymphoma studies.

Authors:  Lei Bi; Jinman Kim; Dagan Feng; Michael Fulham
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2014

Review 4.  PET-Derived Quantitative Metrics for Response and Prognosis in Lymphoma.

Authors:  Lale Kostakoglu; Stéphane Chauvie
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2019-07

5.  Predictive Value of PET Response Combined with Baseline Metabolic Tumor Volume in Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Patients.

Authors:  Anne-Ségolène Cottereau; Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly; Stéphanie Becker; Florence Broussais; Lars Jelstrup Petersen; Christophe Bonnet; John O Prior; Hervé Tilly; Martin Hutchings; Olivier Casasnovas; Michel Meignan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning.

Authors:  Hoo-Chang Shin; Holger R Roth; Mingchen Gao; Le Lu; Ziyue Xu; Isabella Nogues; Jianhua Yao; Daniel Mollura; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Report on the First International Workshop on Interim-PET-Scan in Lymphoma.

Authors:  Michel Meignan; Andrea Gallamini; Michel Meignan; Andrea Gallamini; Corinne Haioun
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2009-08

8.  In vivo treatment sensitivity testing with positron emission tomography/computed tomography after one cycle of chemotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Martin Hutchings; Lale Kostakoglu; Jan Maciej Zaucha; Bogdan Malkowski; Alberto Biggi; Iwona Danielewicz; Annika Loft; Lena Specht; Dominick Lamonica; Myron S Czuczman; Christina Nanni; Pier Luigi Zinzani; Louis Diehl; Richard Stern; Morton Coleman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Metabolic Tumour Volume for Response Prediction in Advanced-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Authors:  Jasmin Mettler; Horst Müller; Conrad-Amadeus Voltin; Christian Baues; Bernd Klaeser; Alden Moccia; Peter Borchmann; Andreas Engert; Georg Kuhnert; Alexander E Drzezga; Markus Dietlein; Carsten Kobe
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation.

Authors:  Konstantinos Kamnitsas; Christian Ledig; Virginia F J Newcombe; Joanna P Simpson; Andrew D Kane; David K Menon; Daniel Rueckert; Ben Glocker
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 8.545

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Artificial Intelligence in Lymphoma PET Imaging:: A Scoping Review (Current Trends and Future Directions).

Authors:  Navid Hasani; Sriram S Paravastu; Faraz Farhadi; Fereshteh Yousefirizi; Michael A Morris; Arman Rahmim; Mark Roschewski; Ronald M Summers; Babak Saboury
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2022-01

2.  Deep Neural Networks and Machine Learning Radiomics Modelling for Prediction of Relapse in Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Catharina Silvia Lisson; Christoph Gerhard Lisson; Marc Fabian Mezger; Daniel Wolf; Stefan Andreas Schmidt; Wolfgang M Thaiss; Eugen Tausch; Ambros J Beer; Stephan Stilgenbauer; Meinrad Beer; Michael Goetz
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Deep-learning segmentation of ultrasound images for automated calculation of the hydronephrosis area to renal parenchyma ratio.

Authors:  Sang Hoon Song; Jae Hyeon Han; Kun Suk Kim; Young Ah Cho; Hye Jung Youn; Young In Kim; Jihoon Kweon
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2022-05-25

4.  Full automation of total metabolic tumor volume from FDG-PET/CT in DLBCL for baseline risk assessments.

Authors:  S Jemaa; J N Paulson; M Hutchings; L Kostakoglu; J Trotman; S Tracy; A de Crespigny; R A D Carano; T C El-Galaly; T G Nielsen; T Bengtsson
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 5.605

5.  A deep learning-based post-processing method for automated pulmonary lobe and airway trees segmentation using chest CT images in PET/CT.

Authors:  Haiqun Xing; Xin Zhang; Yingbin Nie; Sicong Wang; Tong Wang; Hongli Jing; Fang Li
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.