Literature DB >> 33937782

Combination of Active Transfer Learning and Natural Language Processing to Improve Liver Volumetry Using Surrogate Metrics with Deep Learning.

Brett Marinelli1, Martin Kang1, Michael Martini1, John R Zech1, Joseph Titano1, Samuel Cho1, Anthony B Costa1, Eric K Oermann1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if weakly supervised learning with surrogate metrics and active transfer learning can hasten clinical deployment of deep learning models.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: By leveraging Liver Tumor Segmentation (LiTS) challenge 2017 public data (n = 131 studies), natural language processing of reports, and an active learning method, a model was trained to segment livers on 239 retrospectively collected portal venous phase abdominal CT studies obtained between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016. Absolute volume differences between predicted and originally reported liver volumes were used to guide active learning and assess accuracy. Overall survival based on liver volumes predicted by this model (n = 34 patients) versus radiology reports and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease with sodium (MELD-Na) scores was assessed. Differences in absolute liver volume were compared by using the paired Student t test, Bland-Altman analysis, and intraclass correlation; survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method and a Mantel-Cox test.
RESULTS: Data from patients with poor liver volume prediction (n = 10) with a model trained only with publicly available data were incorporated into an active learning method that trained a new model (LiTS data plus over- and underestimated active learning cases [LiTS-OU]) that performed significantly better on a held-out institutional test set (absolute volume difference of 231 vs 176 mL, P = .0005). In overall survival analysis, predicted liver volumes using the best active learning-trained model (LiTS-OU) were at least comparable with liver volumes extracted from radiology reports and MELD-Na scores in predicting survival.
CONCLUSION: Active transfer learning using surrogate metrics facilitated deployment of deep learning models for clinically meaningful liver segmentation at a major liver transplant center.© RSNA, 2019Supplemental material is available for this article. 2019 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 33937782      PMCID: PMC8017413          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2019180019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  13 in total

1.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Reinhard Beichel; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Julien Finet; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Sonia Pujol; Christian Bauer; Dominique Jennings; Fiona Fennessy; Milan Sonka; John Buatti; Stephen Aylward; James V Miller; Steve Pieper; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Validation of a semiautomated liver segmentation method using CT for accurate volumetry.

Authors:  Akshat Gotra; Gabriel Chartrand; Karine Massicotte-Tisluck; Florence Morin-Roy; Franck Vandenbroucke-Menu; Jacques A de Guise; An Tang
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Assessment of liver volume variation to evaluate liver function.

Authors:  Cong Tong; Xinsen Xu; Chang Liu; Tianzheng Zhang; Kai Qu
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  Liver volume in the cirrhotic patient: does size matter?

Authors:  Michael T Hagan; Gregory S Sayuk; Mauricio Lisker-Melman; Kevin M Korenblat; Thomas A Kerr; William C Chapman; Jeffrey S Crippin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Diagnostic Assessment of Deep Learning Algorithms for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi; Mitko Veta; Paul Johannes van Diest; Bram van Ginneken; Nico Karssemeijer; Geert Litjens; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Meyke Hermsen; Quirine F Manson; Maschenka Balkenhol; Oscar Geessink; Nikolaos Stathonikos; Marcory Crf van Dijk; Peter Bult; Francisco Beca; Andrew H Beck; Dayong Wang; Aditya Khosla; Rishab Gargeya; Humayun Irshad; Aoxiao Zhong; Qi Dou; Quanzheng Li; Hao Chen; Huang-Jing Lin; Pheng-Ann Heng; Christian Haß; Elia Bruni; Quincy Wong; Ugur Halici; Mustafa Ümit Öner; Rengul Cetin-Atalay; Matt Berseth; Vitali Khvatkov; Alexei Vylegzhanin; Oren Kraus; Muhammad Shaban; Nasir Rajpoot; Ruqayya Awan; Korsuk Sirinukunwattana; Talha Qaiser; Yee-Wah Tsang; David Tellez; Jonas Annuscheit; Peter Hufnagl; Mira Valkonen; Kimmo Kartasalo; Leena Latonen; Pekka Ruusuvuori; Kaisa Liimatainen; Shadi Albarqouni; Bharti Mungal; Ami George; Stefanie Demirci; Nassir Navab; Seiryo Watanabe; Shigeto Seno; Yoichi Takenaka; Hideo Matsuda; Hady Ahmady Phoulady; Vassili Kovalev; Alexander Kalinovsky; Vitali Liauchuk; Gloria Bueno; M Milagro Fernandez-Carrobles; Ismael Serrano; Oscar Deniz; Daniel Racoceanu; Rui Venâncio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Comparison and evaluation of methods for liver segmentation from CT datasets.

Authors:  Tobias Heimann; Bram van Ginneken; Martin A Styner; Yulia Arzhaeva; Volker Aurich; Christian Bauer; Andreas Beck; Christoph Becker; Reinhard Beichel; György Bekes; Fernando Bello; Gerd Binnig; Horst Bischof; Alexander Bornik; Peter M M Cashman; Ying Chi; Andrés Cordova; Benoit M Dawant; Márta Fidrich; Jacob D Furst; Daisuke Furukawa; Lars Grenacher; Joachim Hornegger; Dagmar Kainmüller; Richard I Kitney; Hidefumi Kobatake; Hans Lamecker; Thomas Lange; Jeongjin Lee; Brian Lennon; Rui Li; Senhu Li; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Gábor Nemeth; Daniela S Raicu; Anne-Mareike Rau; Eva M van Rikxoort; Mikaël Rousson; László Rusko; Kinda A Saddi; Günter Schmidt; Dieter Seghers; Akinobu Shimizu; Pieter Slagmolen; Erich Sorantin; Grzegorz Soza; Ruchaneewan Susomboon; Jonathan M Waite; Andreas Wimmer; Ivo Wolf
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Calculation of child and adult standard liver volume for liver transplantation.

Authors:  K Urata; S Kawasaki; H Matsunami; Y Hashikura; T Ikegami; S Ishizone; Y Momose; A Komiyama; M Makuuchi
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 17.425

8.  Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation.

Authors:  Konstantinos Kamnitsas; Christian Ledig; Virginia F J Newcombe; Joanna P Simpson; Andrew D Kane; David K Menon; Daniel Rueckert; Ben Glocker
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 9.  Liver segmentation: indications, techniques and future directions.

Authors:  Akshat Gotra; Lojan Sivakumaran; Gabriel Chartrand; Kim-Nhien Vu; Franck Vandenbroucke-Menu; Claude Kauffmann; Samuel Kadoury; Benoît Gallix; Jacques A de Guise; An Tang
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2017-06-14

10.  Variable generalization performance of a deep learning model to detect pneumonia in chest radiographs: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  John R Zech; Marcus A Badgeley; Manway Liu; Anthony B Costa; Joseph J Titano; Eric Karl Oermann
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The overview of the deep learning integrated into the medical imaging of liver: a review.

Authors:  Kailai Xiang; Baihui Jiang; Dong Shang
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 6.047

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.