Comparison of ETCO2 Value and Blood Gas PCO2 Value of Patients Receiving Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation Treatment in Emergency Department.

Capnography is the non-invasive measurement and graphic representation of the partial pressure of CO2 in expiration. Although there are many studies in the literature comparing the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2) and end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) values in patients who underwent IMV (invasive mechanical ventilation), there are no studies showing their interchangeable applicability in patients who received NIMV (non-IMV). We aimed to evaluate whether the use of ETCO2 in the treatment process can replace pCO2 use in patients scheduled for NIMV treatment in the emergency department. Patients who applied to the emergency department with respiratory distress between March 2019 and January 2020, who were diagnosed with acute cardiogenic edema or acute chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation, and who needed NIMV were included in the study. General characteristics of the patients and the pCO2 and ETCO2 values were measured in the blood gas 1 h after the NIMV application was started. 64.2% (99 patients) of the patients included in the study were male, and 35.8% (55 patients) were female. The mean age of the patients included in the study was 69.1 ± 12.2 years. The mean pCO2 values ​​were measured as 52.6 ± 13.2. The mean of ETCO2 values ​​measured simultaneously was 33.6 ± 10.1. There was a significant difference between the controlled pCO2 values ​​and ETCO2 values ​​at the first hour of NIMV treatment (Z: - 10.640, p < 0.001). The ETCO2 level was found to be different in our patients who received NIMV treatment, which could not be used instead of the pCO2 level.

Introduction

When the complaints at admission to the emergency department are evaluated, the rate of dyspnea and respiratory distress is 2–3% [1]. Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a frequently used method in treating patients with respiratory distress because it reduces gas exchange and respiratory work and has two types of use: invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) [2]. Blood gas analysis is an important indicator in the follow-up and treatment of patients, and especially the partial pressure (pCO2) value of the carbon dioxide (CO2) gas dissolved in the blood provides guidance for selecting the mode of the mechanical ventilator and adjusting its settings [3].

Capnography is the non-invasive measurement and graphic representation of the partial pressure of CO2 in expiration. It is also called end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) because the measurement is taken from expiratory air. ETCO2 is mostly used in the emergency department to verify the location of the endotracheal tube in the intubated patient, to monitor the spontaneous return during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in cardiac arrest cases, and to monitor the ventilation status in procedural sedoanalgesia. Using ETCO2 instead of pCO2 in the monitoring of intensive care patients undergoing IMV is an increasingly common method [4, 5].

It was found that there is a 1–4 mmHg difference between the pCO2 value and the ETCO2 value in the use of capnography for the monitoring of intubated patients on a mechanical ventilator. However, it was found that the difference between pCO2 and ETCO2 increased in situations such as decreased lung perfusion, pulmonary embolism, dead space ventilation, and cardiac arrest [6]. Although there are many studies in the literature comparing pCO2 and ETCO2 values ​​in patients who underwent IMV, there are no studies showing their interchangeable applicability in patients who received NIMV.

Aims and Objectives

Herein, we aim to describe to evaluate whether the use of ETCO2 in the treatment process can replace pCO2 use in patients scheduled for NIMV treatment in the emergency department.

Methods

Study Participants

This study was conducted as a prospective cross-sectional clinical study at a tertiary university hospital. Approval was obtained from the local ethics committee, and signed informed consent was obtained from all patients who participated in the study or from their first-degree relatives. Patients who applied to the emergency department with respiratory distress between March 2019 and January 2020, who were diagnosed with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) or acute chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation, and who needed NIMV were included in the study. The need for NIMV was determined by clinical senior residents and specialist physicians. Being under 18 years of age, having pulmonary parenchymal diseases such as pneumonia, neuromuscular diseases, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, obesity hypoventilation syndrome, patients who cannot tolerate NIMV treatment, and patients who did not agree to participate in the study were determined as the exclusion criteria. It was ensured that all patients who were treated were conscious, had sufficient cough and swallowing reflex, were clinically stable, and that there was no obstacle on the patient’s face for the application of non-invasive ventilation.

Demographic information such as age, gender and history, vital signs (body temperature, pulse, blood pressure, respiratory rate), fingertip oxygen saturation (SpO2), main physical examination findings (rale, rhoncus, pretibial edema), and outcome conditions were noted in the patients who met the inclusion criteria. The pCO2 and ETCO2 values ​​were measured in the blood gas 1 h after the NIMV application was started.

After the physician decided to apply NIMV in treatment, treatments of patients started with a non-return mask using the continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) modes of the LTV 1200 (Vyaire Medical, Mettawa, Illinois) device. At the first hour of treatment, blood gas samples were taken to adjust the mode settings of the ventilator and to evaluate the treatment. Simultaneously, an A portable mainstream capnograph (Masimo EMMA Mainstream Capnograph; Masimo Corp., CA, USA) was placed between the connection of the mask and the hose, and ETCO2 was measured. Venous blood gas samples were taken from the patients with 22G-tipped blood gas injectors. Testing of the samples taken were performed with the calibrated ABL800 FLEX © blood gas analyzer (ABL800) (Radiometer Medical ApS, Copenhagen, Denmark) device, and the pCO2 value was recorded. The hospitalization and intubation needs of the patients were obtained from the records on the hospital automation system.

Primary Endpoint

The primary endpoint of our study was the comparing pCO2 and ETCO2 values ​​in patients who underwent NIMV.

Secondary Endpoints

The secondary aim is to compare the results of pCO2 and ETCO2 the suitability of using interchangeably.

Statistical Analysis

The data obtained were analyzed by using SPSS for Windows 22 package program. Descriptive numerical variables were presented as mean and standard deviation, and categorical variables were presented as number and percentage. Prior to the comparison of means, normal distribution was tested. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the means in non-normally distributed groups, and the dependent groups’ t-test was used to compare the means in normally distributed variables. Correlation analysis of variables was performed with the Pearson test for normally distributed data, and the Spearman test was used for non-normally distributed data. Bland-Altman analysis was used to determine the agreement between the two methods. Correlation coefficient r value of < 0.20 was considered very weak, 0.20–0.40 weak, 0.40–0.60 moderate, 0.60–0.80 high, > 0.80 very high correlation. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

64.2% (99 patients) of the patients included in the study were male, and 35.8% (55 patients) were female. The mean age of the patients included in the study was 69.1 ± 12.2 years. 55.1% (85 patients) of the pre-diagnoses made by emergency department physicians were COPD, and 44.9% (69 patients) were ADHF. Twenty-nine (19%) of the patients had no previously known diagnosis of COPD or ADHF and were evaluated as new diagnosis in the emergency department (newly diagnosed COPD, 4 patients; newly diagnosed ADHF, 25 patients). Physical examination findings were rale in 104 patients (67.6%), rhoncus in 92 patients (59.7%), and pretibial edema in 72 patients (46.7%).

The mean pCO2 values ​​were measured as 52.6 ± 13.2. The mean of ETCO2 values ​​measured simultaneously was 33.6 ± 10.1. There was a significant difference between the controlled pCO2 values ​​and ETCO2 values ​​at the first hour of NIMV treatment (Z: − 10.640, p < 0.001). However, when the correlation of pCO2 and ETCO2 values was examined, a moderate positive correlation was found (p < 0.001, Spearman r: 0.569) (Table 1).

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of studied patients

Variables	Values (n = 154)
Age (years)
Mean ± standard deviation	69.1 ± 12.2
Gender, n (%)
Male	99 (64.2)
Female	55 (35.8)
Vital signs
SBP, mm Hg	147.1 ± 37.3
DBP, mm Hg	85.3 ± 9.4
Heart rate, beats/min	102.3 ± 22.3
Body temperature	36.3 ± 0.2
Pre-diagnoses, n (%)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease	85 (55.1)
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure	69 (44.9)
Clinical findings, n (%)
Ralles	104 (67.6)
Ronchus	92 (59.7)
Pretibal edema	72 (46.7)
Previous history , n (%)
Hypertension	25 (16.2)
Diabetes mellitus	48 (31.2)
Others	11 (7.1)
1st hour analysis
pCO2	52.6 ± 13.2
ETCO2	33.6 ± 10.1
Outcome
ICU admission	55 (35.7)

SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, PCO2 partial pressure of carbon dioxide, ETCO2 end-tidal carbon dioxide, ICU intensive care unit

BiPAP mode was used in 107 (69.4%) patients, and CPAP mode was used in 47 (30.6%) patients in NIMV treatment. The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, and O2 saturation levels were found to be significantly higher in CPAP mode usage group compared to the BiPAP mode usage group (p < 0.05 for all markers). The mean pCO2 and ETCO2 values were found to be significantly higher in BiPAP mode usage group compared to the CPAP mode usage group (p < 0.001) (Table 2). Scatter plot of ETCO2 vs. pCO2 levels is shown in Fig. 1. Bland-Altman plot illustrating the agreement between pCO2 and ETCO2 is shown in Fig. 2. It was observed that 59.1% (91 patients) of the patients included in the study were hospitalized according to their outcomes. 35.7% (55 patients) of the patients who were hospitalized were admitted to the intensive care unit. 25.4% (14 patients) of the patients who were taken into the intensive care unit resulted in endotracheal intubation.

Table 2

Baseline characteristics of treatment options

Variables	CPAP (n = 47 )	BIPAP (n = 107)	p
Age (year)	71.66 ± 12.45	67.84 ± 11.84	0.061
Sex (male/female)	30/17	69/38	0.539
Mean systolic blood pressure	163.74 ± 41.75	140.18 ± 32.59	0.002
Mean diastolic blood pressure	97.45 ± 27.81	82.84 ± 16.68	0.002
Mean respiratory rate	30.23 ± 7.29	26.95 ± 7.61	0.014
Mean O2 saturation (%)	88.43 ± 7.41	84.68 ± 10.12	< 0.001
Mean pulse/min	106.3 ± 21.71	100.11 ± 22.59	0.180
ETCO2 levels	31.02 ± 9.28	34.81 ± 10.17	< 0.001
PaCO2 levels	45.91 ± 10.52	55.54 ± 13.44	0.031

Fig. 1.

Scatter plot of ETCO2 versus pCO2.

Fig. 2.

Bland–Altman plot illustrating the agreement between ETCO2 and pCO2

Discussion

ETCO2 monitoring with capnometer is a method routinely used in intensive care units to evaluate the respiratory state and rate in patients receiving IMV treatment, and it is advantageous as it does not require intervention. While the use of invasive ETCO2 has become widespread by clinicians who monitor patients in intensive care units, it has been thought that CO2 in physiological dead spaces may reflect the CO2 pressure in the blood. In the literature, the relationship between ETCO2 and pCO2 was first shown with 31 patients in 2000 [7]. In the literature, there are many studies evaluating the usability of ETCO2 instead of pCO2 in blood gas of patients undergoing IMV treatment [8, 9]. In 2017, in a study by Nassar et al., correlation coefficients between pCO2 and ETCO2 values ​​were found to be between 0.6 and 0.9 [10].

A recent study ​​investigating simultaneous ETCO2 and pCO2 measurements in blood gas in SIMV (synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation), CPAP, and T-tube modes of IMV therapy demonstrated a moderate correlation between measured pCO2 and ETCO2 values.9 In 2013, Singh et al. conducted a study in the neonatal intensive care unit and found a moderate correlation between the ETCO2 level and pCO2 level in patients treated with IMV [11]. In a study by Fujimoto et al. conducted in 2019 with 30 patients with respiratory failure and 18 patients with hypercapnia, a significant difference was found between ETCO2 and pCO2 [12].

In 2017, Schwarz et al. evaluated 3 measurements of pCO2 values ​​at the beginning, 30th minute and 60th minute with the Sidestream ETCO2 measurements taken by cannula from the endotracheal tube of patients under IMV treatment in the Bland-Altman analysis. The mean pCO2 values ​​of all patients were found to be 42.4 ± 8.6 mmHg, and the mean of ETCO2 values ​​were 36 ± 7.5 mmHg. A significant correlation was found between the pCO2 value and ETCO2 value. In addition, it was emphasized that ETCO2 was so inconsistent that it could not be used instead of pCO2 [13]. In our study, the mean pCO2 value was measured as 52.6 ± 13.2 mmHg in the blood gas sample taken at the first hour of NIMV treatment. The mean of ETCO2 values ​​measured simultaneously was 33.6 ± 10.1 mmHg. The reason why the pCO2 value is higher than the literature may be that the study was conducted in the emergency department and the patients included in our study were evaluated at the first treatment without providing respiratory and metabolic stabilization.

In our study, similar to the literature, a significant difference was found between the ETCO2 measurement and pCO2 level (Z: − 10.640, p < 0.001). For this reason, we think that it is not appropriate to use the ETCO2 value numerically instead of pCO2 level. Similar to the literature, the results of our study showed a moderate positive correlation between the pCO2 value and ETCO2 value (p < 0.001, r: 0.569). In the literature we reviewed, all the publications in which the ETCO2 level was measured consisted of patients who were intubated or received IMV treatment in intensive care units. We think that the correlation coefficient between the ETCO2 measurement and pCO2 level was lower due to the fact that our patient group consisted of patients receiving NIMV treatment in the emergency department. The reason for this may be that the non-functioning dead space area is more in NIMV applied patients, that there is an uncontrolled air leak outside the system, or that the device sensor used for mainstream measurement is fogged.

ETCO2 is mostly recommended to be used in patients receiving IMV treatment under anesthesia and in the intensive care unit. Despite its use under these conditions, it has been found in studies in the literature that the use of ETCO2 instead of pCO2 value is limited [14]. In our study, in addition to the literature, we think that the ETCO2 level can be used to evaluate the treatment monitoring in patients receiving NIMV treatment.

This study has certain limitations. The first of these was that the first hour observation time was quite short. Another limitation of our study was that although our study was designed prospectively, it was conducted with a relatively small number of patients. Furthermore, the single-center design of our study increased bias. Another limitation was the fact that the NIMV decision was not made by the same physicians may have influenced the results. In addition, the lack of evaluation of the time from the onset of symptoms to hospital admission may have affected the results.

Conclusion

The ETCO2 level was found to be different in our patients who received NIMV treatment, which could not be used instead of the pCO2 level. However, the positive moderate correlation between the ETCO2 level and pCO2 level and the monitoring of NIMV treatment with the ETCO2 level may have benefits such as predicting an unexpected increase in pCO2 levels or making the decision to intubate patients faster.