| Literature DB >> 33937191 |
Kai Li1,2, Chao Teng1, Shuang Wang1,3, Qianhao Min2.
Abstract
PhotocatEntities:
Keywords: CO2 photoreduction; TIO2-based photocatalysts; heterostructures; high efficiency; water oxidation
Year: 2021 PMID: 33937191 PMCID: PMC8082425 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2021.637501
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
FIGURE 1Schematic diagrams of (A) natural photosynthesis and (B) semiconductor photocatalytic reduction of CO2. Reproduced from Liu et al. (2016) with permission from Wiley-VCH and Wei et al. (2018) with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.
The possible reactions during the photocatalytic CO2 reduction process.
| Reactions | Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 237 |
| 2 |
| 257 |
| 3 |
| 286 |
| 4 |
| 522 |
| 5 |
| 703 |
| 6 |
| 818 |
Electrochemical potentials of H2O oxidation and CO2 reduction into various products.
| Reactions |
| |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 1.23 |
| 2 |
| −1.9 |
| 3 |
| −0.53 |
| 4 |
| −0.61 |
| 5 |
| −0.48 |
| 6 |
| −0.38 |
| 7 |
| −0.24 |
| 8 |
| −0.41 |
FIGURE 2Separation and transfer of photogenerated charge carriers in the TiO2-based (A) S-S heterojunction, (B) S-M heterojunction, (C) S-C heterojunction and (D) phase and facet heterojunction; (E) Crystalline structures of TiO2 (anatase) and TiO2 (rutile).
FIGURE 3Schematic diagram showing the energy band structure and electron-hole pair separation in the p-n heterojunction. Reproduced from Wang et al. (2014) with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.
FIGURE 4Photogenerated charge carrier transfer process for two types of non p-n heterojunctions: (A) type II-1, and (B) type II-2 (direct Z-scheme). Reproduced from Zhang and Jaroniec (2018) with permission from Elsevier and Copyright Clearance Center.
Photocatalytic CO2 reduction performance on typical TiO2-based S-S (Z-scheme), S-M, S-C, multicomponent, phase and facet heterojunctions.
| Photocatalyst | Reductant | Light source | Generation rate of main products (μmol∙gcat −1∙h−1) | Quantum efficiency (%) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indirect Z-scheme heterojunction | |||||
| CdS/rGO/TiO2 | H2O vapor | 300 W | CH4: 0.12 (μmol∙h−1) | - |
|
| Xe lamp | |||||
| CuGaS2-RGO-TiO2 | Na2S aqueous solution | 300 W | CO: 0.15 | - |
|
| Xe lamp (λ > 330 nm) | H2: 28.8 (μmol∙h−1) | ||||
| Al−O Linked porous-g-C3N4/TiO2-nanotube (PCN/TNT) | Na2SO4 aqueous solution | 150 W Xe lamp | CH3COOH | - |
|
| HCOOH | |||||
| CH3OH | |||||
| ZnFe2O4/Ag/TiO2 nanorods | H2O vapor | 200 W Hg lamp | CO: 1025 | - |
|
| CH4: 132 | |||||
| CH3OH: 30.8 | |||||
| C2H6: 19.1 (μmol∙h−1) | |||||
| g-C3N4/Pt/3DOM-TiO2@C | H2O vapor | 300 W Xe lamp (λ ≥ 420 nm) | CO: 1.47 | 5.67 |
|
| CH4: 6.56 | |||||
| H2: 0.82 | |||||
| (Au/A-TiO2)@g-C3N4 | H2O vapor | 300 W Xe lamp (λ ≥ 420 nm) | CH4: 37.4 | 1.91 |
|
| CO: 21.7 | |||||
| Direct Z-scheme heterojunction | |||||
| Cu2O/TiO2 | H2O vapor | 1 kW high-pressure Hg (Xe) arc lamp (λ ≥ 305 nm) | CO: 2.11 | - |
|
| ZnIn2S4/TiO2 | H2O vapor | 300 W Xe lamp | CH4: 1.135 | - |
|
| TiO2/CuInS2 | H2O vapor | 350 W Xe lamp | CH4: 2.5 | - |
|
| TiO2/CdS | H2O vapor | 300 W Xe lamp | CH4: 11.9 | - |
|
| μmol∙h−1∙m−2 | |||||
| Zn3In2S6/TiO2 | H2O vapor | 300 W Xe lamp | CH4: 6.19 | - |
|
| CO: 23.35 | |||||
| Nb-TiO2/g-C3N4 | H2O vapor | Two 30 W white bulbs | CH4: 562 | - |
|
| CO: 420 | |||||
| HCOOH: 698 | |||||
| Copper (II)-porphyrin zirconium metal-organic framework (PCN-224(Cu))/TiO2 | Na2SO4 aqueous solution | 300 W Xe lamp | CO: 37.21 | - |
|
| WO3-TiO2/Cu2ZnSnS4 | H2O vapor | 400 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | CH4: 1.69 | 0.52 |
|
| CO: 15.37 | |||||
| Au-TiO2 | H2O vapor | AM1.5 G simulated sunlight | CH4: 302 | - |
|
| 50 W white cold LED light (λ > 400 nm) | HCHO: 420 | - | |||
| CO: 323 | |||||
| Single metal | |||||
| 3DOM Au/TiO2 | H2O vapor | 300 W Xe lamp | CH4: 2.89 | - |
|
| Pt2+-Pt0/TiO2 | H2O vapor | 300 W Xe lamp | H2: 394.7 | 0.36 |
|
| CH4: 37.78 | |||||
| CO: 8.03 | |||||
| Ag/TiO2 | H2O vapor | 300 W Xe lamp | CH4: 1.40 | 0.16 (400 nm); 0.013 (520 nm) |
|
| Ag/TiO2 nanorod arrays | H2O vapor | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | CH4: 1.13 | - |
|
| CO: 12 | |||||
| Pt/TiO2 | H2O vapor | Four 6 W lamps (λ ≤ 365 nm) | CH4 | - |
|
| Pt/TiO2-COK-12 | CO | ||||
| Ag/TiO2 nanotube arrays (TNTAs) | H2O vapor | 300 W Xe lamp | CH4 | - |
|
| Pt/TiO2-Al2O3 foam | H2O vapor | UV 8 W Hg lamp | H2: 22.5 | - |
|
| CH4: 1.21 | |||||
| CO: 0.54 | |||||
| Au-TiO2 Nanotubes (TNTs) | H2O vapor | 300 W Xe lamp | CH4: 14.67% | - |
|
| Au/TiO2 | H2O vapor | 300 W Xe lamp | CH4: 70.34 | - |
|
| CO: 19.75 | |||||
| Au/TiO2 | H2O vapor | 300 W Xe lamp | CH4: 0.2 | - |
|
| CO: 1.2 | |||||
| Metal alloy | |||||
| (Au, Cu)/TiO2 | H2O vapor | AM1.5 G simulated sunlight | H2: 286 | - |
|
| CH4: 2200 ± 300 | |||||
| AgPd/TiO2 | Triethylamine (TEA) aqueous solution | 300 W Xe lamp | H2: 144.5 | - |
|
| CH4: 79.0 | |||||
| PtRu/TiO2 | H2O vapor | 300 W Xe lamp | H2: 16.5 | 0.98 |
|
| CH4: 38.7 | |||||
| CO: 2.6 | |||||
| Hierarchical urchin-like yolk@shell TiO2-xHx (HUY@S-TOH)/AuPd | H2O (liquid) | 300 W Xe lamp | CH4: 47.0 | - |
|
| Graphene and its derivatives | |||||
| Graphene-TiO2 | H2O vapor | 300 W Xe lamp | CH4: 8 | - |
|
| C2H6: 16.8 | |||||
| RGO/Pt-TiO2 nanotubes (TNTs) | H2O vapor | 500 W tungsten-halog--en lamp | CH4: 10.96 (μmol∙m−2) | - |
|
| TiO2/Nitrogen doped rGO (NrGO) | H2O vapor | 400 W Xe lamp | CO: 50 | 0.0072 |
|
| GO/oxygen rich TiO2 (OTiO2) | H2O vapor | 300 W Xe lamp | CH4: 0.43 | 0.0103 |
|
| rGO/TiO2 | H2O vapor | 500 W Hg lamp | CH4: 12.75 | - |
|
| CO: 11.93 | |||||
| ((Pt/TiO2)@rGO) | H2O vapor | 300 W Xe lamp | H2: 5.6 | 1.93 |
|
| CH4: 41.3 | |||||
| CO: 0.4 | |||||
| Graphene quantum dots (GQDs)/TiO2 | H2O vapor | 100 W Xe solar simulator | CH4: 1.98 (ppm∙cm−2∙h−1) | - |
|
| rGO/TiO2 | Triethanolamine (TEOA) aqueous solution | 8 W UV-A lamp | CH3OH: 2330 | - |
|
| CNT | |||||
| MWCNT/TiO2 | H2O vapor | 15 W UV lamp | CH4: 11.74 | - |
|
| HCOOH: 18.67 | |||||
| C2H5OH: 29.87 | |||||
| MWCNT/TiO2 | H2O (liquid) | 15 W energy saving light bulb | CH4: 0.17 | - |
|
| Ag-MWCNT@TiO2 | H2O vapor | 15 W energy saving light bulb | CH4: 0.91 | - |
|
| C2H6: 0.048 | |||||
| MWCNT/TiO2 | TEOA aqueous solution | 8 W UV-A lamp | H2: 2360.0 | - |
|
| CH3OH: 3246.1 | |||||
| HCOOH: 68.5 | |||||
| CNT/TiO2/Cu | H2O vapor | 300 W Xe lamp | CH4: 1.1 | - |
|
| CO: 8.1 | |||||
| Other carbon forms | |||||
| Carbon@TiO2 hollow spheres | H2O vapor | 300 W Xe lamp | CH4: 4.2 | - |
|
| CH3OH: 9.1 | |||||
| N, S-containing carbon quantum dots (NCQDs)/TiO2 | H2O vapor | 300 W Xe lamp | CH4: 0.13 | - |
|
| CO: 0.19 | |||||
| Carbon nanofibers@TiO2 | H2O vapor | 350 W Xe lamp | CH4: 13.52 | - |
|
| MgO-Pt-TiO2 | H2O vapor | 100 W Xe lamp | H2: 14 | - |
|
| CH4: 1.2 | |||||
| CO: 1.8 | |||||
| Pt-rGO-TiO2 | H2O vapor | 15 W energy saving light bulb | CH4: 0.28 | - |
|
| Pd-rGO-TiO2 | CH4: 0.20 | ||||
| Ag-rGO-TiO2 | CH4: 0.17 | ||||
| Au-rGO-TiO2 | CH4: 0.13 | ||||
| Pt-Cu2O/TiO2 | H2O vapor | 300 W Xe lamp | CH4: 1.42 | - |
|
| CO: 0.05 | |||||
| WSe2-Graphene-TiO2 | Na2SO3 aqueous solution | 300 W Xe lamp | CH3OH: 6.33 | - |
|
| Pt/MgAl layered double oxides (MgAl-LDO)/TiO2 | H2O (liquid) | 300 W Xe lamp | CH4: 1.42 | - |
|
| CO: 2.3 | |||||
| TiO2-Graphene few-layered MoS2 | H2O vapor | 300 W Xe lamp | CO: 92.33 | - |
|
| Au/Al2O3/TiO2 | H2O vapor | 450 W Xe lamp | CO: 11.8 | - |
|
| TiO2-MnOx-Pt | H2O vapor | 350 W Xe lamp | CH4: 34.67 | - |
|
| CH3OH: 30.33 (μmol∙m−2∙h−1) | |||||
| Ag-MgO-TiO2 | H2O vapor | 300 W Xe lamp | CH4: 0.86 | 0.091 |
|
| CH3OH: 0.06 | |||||
| Au@TiO2 hollow spheres (THS)@CoO | H2O vapor | 300 W Xe lamp | CH4: 13.3 | - |
|
| Phase heterojunction | |||||
| Anatase-rutile TiO2 fibers | H2O vapor | Four 6 W | CO: 10.19 | 0.036 |
|
| UV lamps | CH4: 1.34 | ||||
| H2: 19.94 | |||||
| Anatase-rutile TiO2 nanoparticles with oxygen vacancy | H2O vapor | 300 W | CH4: 43.2 | - |
|
| Xe lamp | |||||
| Disordered Anatase/ordered rutile (Ad/Ro) TiO2 nanoparticles | H2O vapor | Solar simulator 1 Sun | CH4: 3.98 | 0.273 |
|
| CO: 3.02 | |||||
| Pt-loaded anatase-rutile TiO2 nanoparticles | H2O vapor | 200 W Hg–Xe light | CH4 | - |
|
| CO | |||||
| N-doped carbon coating paragenetic anatase/rutile heterojunction | TEOA and MeCN | 300 W | CO: 24.31 | - |
|
| Xe lamp | |||||
| SrCO3-Modified brookite/anatase TiO2 heterojunction | H2O vapor | 300 W | CH4: 19.66 | - |
|
| Xe lamp | CO: 2.64 | ||||
| Facet heterojunction | |||||
| {101}/{001} TiO2 | H2O vapor | 300 W | CH4: 1.35 | - |
|
| Xe lamp | |||||
| Oxygen-deficient {101}/{001} TiO2 | H2O vapor | 100 W Hg lamp/450 W Xe lamp | CO: ∼10.91 (UV-vis) | 0.31 (UV-vis) |
|
| CO: ∼5.36 (visible) | 0.134 (visible) | ||||
| Pt-loaded {101}/{001} TiO2 | 0.1 M KHCO3 solution | 250 W Hg lamp | CH4: 4.0 | - |
|
| Pt-loaded {101}/{001} TiO2 | H2O vapor | 300 W | CH4: 4.6 | - |
|
| Xe lamp | H2: 9.9 | ||||
| Graphene supported {101}/{001} TiO2 | H2O vapor | 300 W | CO: 70.8 | CO: 0.0557 CH4: 0.0864 |
|
| Xe lamp | CH4: 27.4 |
FIGURE 5(A) SEM and (B) HRTEM images of (Au/A-TiO2)@g-C3N4 catalyst; (C) Schematic for photorecatalytic CO2 reduction with H2O to produce CH4 and CO over (Au/A-TiO2)@g-C3N4. Reproduced from Wang et al., 2020a with permission from Elsevier and Copyright Clearance Center. (D) TEM and (E) HRTEM images of 3DOM-CNPTC photocatalyst; (F) The mechanism of 3DOM-CNPTC catalyst for photocatalytic CO2 reduction with H2O to CH4. Reproduced from Wang et al. (2020) with permission from Elsevier and Copyright Clearance Center.
FIGURE 6XRD patterns of (A) ZnInS2/TiO2 series, (B) CuInS2/TiO2 series and (C) Zn3In2S6/TiO2 series. Reproduced from Yang et al. (2017) and Xu et al. (2018) with permission from Elsevier and Copyright Clearance Center, and She et al. (2018) with permission from Wiley-VCH, respectively.
FIGURE 7Band structure of semiconductor (A) before contact and (B) after contact with metal to form the Schottky barrier; (C) the SPR effect induced hot electron transfer. Reproduced from Bai et al. (2015) with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.
FIGURE 8(A) TEM images of 0.5 Pt/TiO2 and 0.5 Pt/TiO2-COK-12, (B) FTIR spectra of the TiO2, 0.5 Pt/TiO2 and 0.5 Pt/TiO2-COK-12 catalysts after reaction, in the CO stretching region, (C) Schematic representation of the proposed reaction pathway over TiO2 and Pt/TiO2 catalysts, and (D) Net selectivities and quantum yield indices (QYI) obtained with the different catalysts. The QYI with TiO2 is 1 by definition. Reproduced from Tasbihi et al. (2018a) with permission from Elsevier and Copyright Clearance Center.
FIGURE 9(A) Schematic illustration of electrochemical deposition methods for loading Ag NPs into the TNTAs, (B) SEM image (top view) and (C) TEM image (side view) of Ag/TNTAs-E, Comparison of high-resolution SIXPS spectra of (D) Ti 2p and (E) Ti 2p3/2 for TNTAs and Ag/TNTAs-E in the dark and under 520 nm LED light irradiation, and (F) Schematic illustration of the enhanced SPR effect of Ag NPs in the TNTAs structure. Reproduced from Low et al. (2018) with permission from Elsevier and Copyright Clearance Center.
FIGURE 10(A) FESEM images of TNS, CSTS, T60, T120 and T180, and TEM images of T60, T120 and T180, and STEM image of T60 and the corresponding elemental mapping images of C, O and Ti; (B) Comparison of the photocatalytic CH4 or CH3OH evolution rate of carbon@TiO2 composite samples and P25 (under simulated solar light); and (C) Photoexcitation process of the carbon@TiO2 composite photocatalyst with hollow structure. Reproduced from Wang et al. (2017) with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.
FIGURE 11SEM images of as-prepared (A) TiO2 and (B) TiO2-MnOx-Pt (TMP); (C) Schematic diagram of selective photodeposition process of MnOx nanoflakes and Pt nanoparticles on anatase TiO2 {001} and {101} facets; Schematic diagram of proposed photocatalytic CO2 reduction mechanism of sample TMP. The relative band energy positions of TiO2, Pt, and MnOx (A) before contact and (B) after contact and under irradiation. Reproduced from Meng et al. (2019) with permission from the American Chemical Society.
FIGURE 12FESEM images of (A) HF4.5 and (B) HF9; Schematic illustration of (C) tuning the ratio of {101} to {001} facets of anatase TiO2 by adjusting the amount of HF, and (D) charge transfer at the interface of {101}-{001} facet heterojunction of anatase TiO2; (E) Comparison of the photocatalytic CH4-production activity of P25 and the TiO2 samples prepared by varying HF amount. Reproduced from Yu et al. (2014) with permission from the American Chemical Society.