Literature DB >> 33936729

Put your money where your mouth is.

Jesse R Qualliotine1, Tzyynong L Friesen1,2.   

Abstract

Suspicion for battery ingestion should be maintained for any round radiopaque foreign body. Presence of the classic "double ring" sign on plain film should prompt emergent operative removal, although it is not pathognomonic.
© 2021 The Authors. Clinical Case Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  button battery; foreign body; ingestion; pediatric emergency medicine

Year:  2021        PMID: 33936729      PMCID: PMC8077265          DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.3998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Case Rep        ISSN: 2050-0904


Abstract and clinical question (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1

Anteroposterior plain film demonstrating a radio‐opaque foreign body with a “double ring” superimposing the esophagus

Anteroposterior plain film demonstrating a radio‐opaque foreign body with a “double ring” superimposing the esophagus A 7‐year‐old girl was brought to the emergency department for progressive throat pain and poor secretion tolerance 2 hours after swallowing a metallic object that she was unable to regurgitate. What is the differential diagnosis and next step?

DISCUSSION

An anteroposterior plain film demonstrated a “double ring” sign (Figure 1), concerning for a button battery, but the lateral film was equivocal. Otolaryngology was consulted, and she was urgently taken to the operating room for rigid esophagoscopy. Fortunately, a bimetallic coin ($5 Mexican Peso) was retrieved instead of a button battery (Figure 2). Although foreign body ingestions are generally well tolerated, lithium battery ingestions can become quickly fatal as it reacts with saliva, releasing strong alkali that cause electrochemical burns and liquefactive necrosis resulting in esophageal erosions complicated by mediastinitis or, in the worst case, an aortoesophageal fistula. Although suspicion for battery ingestion should be maintained for any round radiopaque foreign body, presence of the classic “double ring” sign on plain film should prompt emergent operative removal. This radiographic tip‐off is created by the battery's concentric anode and cathode, though the outer ring is typically thinner than this image. Lateral views of a battery in profile can show a slight height step‐off. This patient was happily discharged from the recovery suite after passing a PO challenge.
FIGURE 2

The foreign body retrieved at the time of rigid esophagoscopy was a bimetallic coin ($5 Mexican Peso)

The foreign body retrieved at the time of rigid esophagoscopy was a bimetallic coin ($5 Mexican Peso)

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None of the authors have published or submitted any related papers from the same study or have any conflicts of interest or financial disclosures to report.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

JRQ: involved in study conception, data acquisition and literature review, manuscript drafting, critical revision of manuscript, and final approval of manuscript. TLF: involved in study conception, critical revision of manuscript, and final approval of manuscript.

ETHICAL APPROVAL

This manuscript is exempt from the UC San Diego Health Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval process because it does not contain any patient identifying information or photographs.
  2 in total

1.  Anesthetic Implications of the New Guidelines for Button Battery Ingestion in Children.

Authors:  Monica A Hoagland; Richard J Ing; Kris R Jatana; Ian N Jacobs; Debnath Chatterjee
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Management and Outcomes of Button Batteries in the Aerodigestive Tract: A Multi-institutional Study.

Authors:  Amber D Shaffer; Ian N Jacobs; Craig S Derkay; Nira A Goldstein; Terri Giordano; Sandra Ho; Bong J Kim; Albert H Park; Jeffrey P Simons
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 3.325

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.