Literature DB >> 33936717

A rare mimic of cecal neoplasia.

Thomas Albrecht1, Moritz von Frankenberg2, Benjamin Goeppert1.   

Abstract

Appendiceal intussusception is a rare, but relevant differential diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia on endoscopy. Misdiagnosis as polyp and endoscopic removal may result in severe iatrogenic complications.
© 2021 The Authors. Clinical Case Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal neoplasia; appendiceal intussusception; colonoscopy; gastroenterology; general surgery; polyp

Year:  2021        PMID: 33936717      PMCID: PMC8077264          DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.3921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Case Rep        ISSN: 2050-0904


CASE REPORT

Appendiceal intussusception is a rare condition of various etiology and may mimic colorectal neoplasia. Clinical awareness of this condition is important for proper therapeutic management and to avoid iatrogenic complications. A 46‐year‐old female presented with dull right lower‐quadrant pain for three weeks and tenderness at McBurney's point. Ultrasound revealed a hypoechoic mass protruding in the cecum, which was considered suspicious in subsequent colonoscopy, performed to rule out malignancy (Figure 1A). The patient underwent ileocecal resection. Gross pathological examination showed a polypoid structure with focal hemorrhage (Figure 1B and 1C ). Integrating the clinical scenario and gross findings, what is the diagnosis and the most likely underlying condition?
FIGURE 1

A: Endoscopic view of the lesion. B: Ileocecal resection specimen. Hashtag: Ileum; asterisk: cecum; arrow: ileocecal valve; tweezers: lesion. C: Close‐up view of the lesion

A: Endoscopic view of the lesion. B: Ileocecal resection specimen. Hashtag: Ileum; asterisk: cecum; arrow: ileocecal valve; tweezers: lesion. C: Close‐up view of the lesion The lesion unmasked as a complete intussusception of the appendix (Figure 2A). Histological evaluation confirmed the finding of an inverted appendix (Figure 2B) with associated ulcerative inflammation. Additionally, glandular structures (Figure 2B and 2C) embedded in an endometrial stroma were found within the appendiceal wall, consistent with appendiceal endometriosis. The patient was discharged in good health.
FIGURE 2

A: Ileocecal resection specimen with serosal view of the intussusception. The tweezers hold stretched, invaginated mesenteric tissue next to the original location of the appendix (arrow), which appears absent from this perspective. Also note that due to the serosal perspective neither the ileocecal valve nor ileal mucosa are visible on this image. asterisk: cecum. B: Histology of the inverted appendix (transverse section). Asterisk: serosa outside‐in; hashtag: mucosa inside‐out. H&E, 40× magnification. C. Histology showing appendiceal endometriosis with glandular structures (arrows) embedded in an endometrial stroma. H&E, 100× magnification

A: Ileocecal resection specimen with serosal view of the intussusception. The tweezers hold stretched, invaginated mesenteric tissue next to the original location of the appendix (arrow), which appears absent from this perspective. Also note that due to the serosal perspective neither the ileocecal valve nor ileal mucosa are visible on this image. asterisk: cecum. B: Histology of the inverted appendix (transverse section). Asterisk: serosa outside‐in; hashtag: mucosa inside‐out. H&E, 40× magnification. C. Histology showing appendiceal endometriosis with glandular structures (arrows) embedded in an endometrial stroma. H&E, 100× magnification Appendiceal intussusception is a rare condition first described by McKidd et al in 1858. Endometriosis represents the most common adult etiology. Clinical diagnosis is difficult, which is why in most cases appendiceal intussusception is diagnosed upon surgery. Awareness of this condition is, however, crucial as endoscopic removal may result in severe iatrogenic complications, if misdiagnosed as colonic polyp.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

TA: involved in writing the case report and review of literature. MvF: involved in the patient's care and provided clinical details. BG: involved in writing the case report and review of literature.

ETHICS APPROVAL

The use of tissue specimens was approved by the University's ethics committee (approval code 206/2015).
  2 in total

Review 1.  Imaging right lower quadrant pain: Not always appendicitis.

Authors:  Pranav Sharma; Rahul Hegde; Ashwini Kulkarni; Priti Soin; Puneet Kochar; Eran Rotem
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 1.605

2.  Appendiceal Intussusception: A Diagnostic Challenge.

Authors:  Inbal Samuk; Adriana Nica; Yaniv Lakovski; Enrique Freud
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.191

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.