Literature DB >> 33935581

3D simulations of oxygen shell burning with and without magnetic fields.

Vishnu Varma1, Bernhard Müller1.   

Abstract

We present a first 3D magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulation of convective oxygen and neon shell burning in a non-rotating [Formula: see text] star shortly before core collapse to study the generation of magnetic fields in supernova progenitors. We also run a purely hydrodynamic control simulation to gauge the impact of the magnetic fields on the convective flow and on convective boundary mixing. After about 17 convective turnover times, the magnetic field is approaching saturation levels in the oxygen shell with an average field strength of [Formula: see text], and does not reach kinetic equipartition. The field remains dominated by small-to-medium scales, and the dipole field strength at the base of the oxygen shell is only [Formula: see text]. The angle-averaged diagonal components of the Maxwell stress tensor mirror those of the Reynolds stress tensor, but are about one order of magnitude smaller. The shear flow at the oxygen-neon shell interface creates relatively strong fields parallel to the convective boundary, which noticeably inhibit the turbulent entrainment of neon into the oxygen shell. The reduced ingestion of neon lowers the nuclear energy generation rate in the oxygen shell and thereby slightly slows down the convective flow. Aside from this indirect effect, we find that magnetic fields do not appreciably alter the flow inside the oxygen shell. We discuss the implications of our results for the subsequent core-collapse supernova and stress the need for longer simulations, resolution studies, and an investigation of non-ideal effects for a better understanding of magnetic fields in supernova progenitors.
© 2021 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Astronomical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MHD; convection; stars: interiors; stars: magnetic field; stars: massive; turbulence

Year:  2021        PMID: 33935581      PMCID: PMC8056252          DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mon Not R Astron Soc        ISSN: 0035-8711            Impact factor:   5.287


  10 in total

1.  Critical magnetic Prandtl number for small-scale dynamo.

Authors:  Alexander A Schekochihin; Steven C Cowley; Jason L Maron; James C McWilliams
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Mach number dependence of turbulent magnetic field amplification: solenoidal versus compressive flows.

Authors:  C Federrath; G Chabrier; J Schober; R Banerjee; R S Klessen; D R G Schleicher
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Generation of a magnetic field by dynamo action in a turbulent flow of liquid sodium.

Authors:  R Monchaux; M Berhanu; M Bourgoin; M Moulin; Ph Odier; J-F Pinton; R Volk; S Fauve; N Mordant; F Pétrélis; A Chiffaudel; F Daviaud; B Dubrulle; C Gasquet; L Marié; F Ravelet
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Numerical demonstration of fluctuation dynamo at low magnetic Prandtl numbers.

Authors:  A B Iskakov; A A Schekochihin; S C Cowley; J C McWilliams; M R E Proctor
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Energy flux determines magnetic field strength of planets and stars.

Authors:  Ulrich R Christensen; Volkmar Holzwarth; Ansgar Reiners
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Equation of State Effects in Core-Collapse Supernovae.

Authors:  H Yasin; S Schäfer; A Arcones; A Schwenk
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Transition to Turbulent Dynamo Saturation.

Authors:  Kannabiran Seshasayanan; Basile Gallet; Alexandros Alexakis
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 9.161

8.  Muon Creation in Supernova Matter Facilitates Neutrino-Driven Explosions.

Authors:  R Bollig; H-T Janka; A Lohs; G Martínez-Pinedo; C J Horowitz; T Melson
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 9.161

9.  Observational diversity of magnetized neutron stars.

Authors:  Teruaki Enoto; Shota Kisaka; Shinpei Shibata
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2019-10

10.  Magnetar formation through a convective dynamo in protoneutron stars.

Authors:  Raphaël Raynaud; Jérôme Guilet; Hans-Thomas Janka; Thomas Gastine
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 14.136

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.