| Literature DB >> 33935397 |
Farida Nurzhanova1, Gaisa Absatirov1, Bekzhasar Sidikhov1, Alexander Sidorchuk2, Nurbek Ginayatov1, Kenzhebek Murzabaev1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The use of plant-based medicine in treating and preventing fish disease has become increasingly popular due to the resistance of bacterial pathogens to chemicals widely used in aquaculture. This study explored the vulnerary effect of botanical medicines made from local raw materials (greater celandine [Chelidonium majus L.], St. John's wort [Hypericum perforatum L.], and bur beggar-ticks [Bidens tripartita L.]) in the treatment of sturgeon bacterial pathologies in a controlled environment.Entities:
Keywords: fish; plant raw material; vulnerary effect; wound
Year: 2021 PMID: 33935397 PMCID: PMC8076460 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.551-557
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Figure-1Macroscopic changes in the wound in the first experimental group (treatment with Chelidonium majus): (a) At the beginning of the experiments; (b) the 3rd day of the experiments; (c) the 5th day of the experiments; (d) the 7th day of the experiments; (e) the 10th day of the experiments; (f) the 15th day of the experiments.
Figure-3Macroscopic changes in the wound in the second experimental group (treatment with Hypericum perforatum): (a) At the beginning of the experiments; (b) the 3rd day of the experiments; (c) the 5th day of the experiments; (d) the 7th day of the experiments; (e) the 10th day of the experiments; (f) the 15th day of the experiments.
Figure-4A wound in the control group (without treatment): (a) At the beginning of the experiment; (b) at the end of the experiment.
Fish survival during the experiment.
| Groups | The period of the experiment (days) | Survival rate, % | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3rd day | 5th day | 7th day | 10th day | 15th day | 20th day | ||
| Fish mortality | |||||||
| First group (n=15) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 100 |
| Second group (n=15) | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 93 |
| Third group (n=15) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 100 |
| Control group (n=15) | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | - | - | 46 |
The dynamics of wound healing in fish.
| Groups | The average area of the wound (mm) | Wound healing, % | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start | 3rd day | 5th day | 7th day | 10th day | 15th day | 20th day | ||
| First group (n=15) | 28.72±6.22 | 27.20±5.84 | 23.91±5.09 | 16.71±4.17 | 9.55±3.09 | 4.79±1.71 | 1.89±0.73 | 93.4 |
| Second group (n=15) | 20.39±4.37 | 17.23±4.24 | 16.24±4.03 | 15.77±4.00 | 15.33±3.93 | 14.86±3.93 | 14.39±3.91 | 29.5 |
| Third group (n=15) | 25.00±5.80 | 20.15±5.26 | 15.48±4.45 | 11.12±3.38 | 7.43±2.50 | 3.80±1.47 | 1.67±0.65 | 93.3 |
| Control group (n=15) | 19.03±4.31 | 11.47±3.15 | 8.60±2.93 | 8.24±3.20 | 7.57±3.24 | 7.84±3.33 | 8.19±3.58 | 0 |
*p<0.05;
p<0.01; ***p<0.001 in comparison with the control
Figure-2Macroscopic changes in the wound in the second experimental group (treatment with Bidens tripartite): (a) At the beginning of the experiments; (b) the 3rd day of the experiments; (c) the 5th day of the experiments; (d) the 7th day of the experiments; (e) the 10th day of the experiments; (f) the 15th day of the experiments.
Figure-5The dynamics of wound size reduction, mm2.