PURPOSE: This study aimed to test the hypothesis that a simulated burn injury on the torso will be no more or less detrimental to core temperature control than on the limbs during uncompensable exercise-heat stress. METHODS: Nine nonburned individuals (7 men, 2 women) completed the protocol. On separate occasions, burn injuries of identical surface area (0.45 ± 0.08 m2 or 24.4% ± 4.4% of total body surface area) were simulated on the torso or the arms/legs using an absorbent, vapor-impermeable material that impedes sweat evaporation in those regions. Participants performed 60 min of treadmill walking at 5.3 km·h-1 and a 4.1% ± 0.8% grade, targeting 6 W·kg-1 of metabolic heat production in 40.1°C ± 0.2°C and 19.6% ± 0.6% relative humidity conditions. Rectal temperature, heart rate, and perceptual responses were measured. RESULTS: Rectal temperature increased to a similar extent with simulated injuries on the torso and limbs (condition-by-time interaction, P = 0.86), with a final rectal temperature 0.9°C ± 0.3°C above baseline in both conditions. No differences in heart rate, perceived exertion, or thermal sensation were observed between conditions (condition-by-time interactions, P ≥ 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: During uncompensable exercise-heat stress, sized-matched simulated burn injuries on the torso or limbs evoke comparable core temperature, heart rate, and perceptual responses, suggesting that the risk of exertional heat illness in such environmental conditions is independent of injury location.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to test the hypothesis that a simulated burn injury on the torso will be no more or less detrimental to core temperature control than on the limbs during uncompensable exercise-heat stress. METHODS: Nine nonburned individuals (7 men, 2 women) completed the protocol. On separate occasions, burn injuries of identical surface area (0.45 ± 0.08 m2 or 24.4% ± 4.4% of total body surface area) were simulated on the torso or the arms/legs using an absorbent, vapor-impermeable material that impedes sweat evaporation in those regions. Participants performed 60 min of treadmill walking at 5.3 km·h-1 and a 4.1% ± 0.8% grade, targeting 6 W·kg-1 of metabolic heat production in 40.1°C ± 0.2°C and 19.6% ± 0.6% relative humidity conditions. Rectal temperature, heart rate, and perceptual responses were measured. RESULTS: Rectal temperature increased to a similar extent with simulated injuries on the torso and limbs (condition-by-time interaction, P = 0.86), with a final rectal temperature 0.9°C ± 0.3°C above baseline in both conditions. No differences in heart rate, perceived exertion, or thermal sensation were observed between conditions (condition-by-time interactions, P ≥ 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: During uncompensable exercise-heat stress, sized-matched simulated burn injuries on the torso or limbs evoke comparable core temperature, heart rate, and perceptual responses, suggesting that the risk of exertional heat illness in such environmental conditions is independent of injury location.
Authors: Scott L Davis; Manabu Shibasaki; David A Low; Jian Cui; David M Keller; Gary F Purdue; John L Hunt; T Brett D Arnoldo; Karen J Kowalske; Craig G Crandall Journal: J Burn Care Res Date: 2007 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.845
Authors: Daniel Gagnon; Steven A Romero; Matthew N Cramer; Ken Kouda; Paula Y S Poh; Hai Ngo; Ollie Jay; Craig G Crandall Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 5.411