BACKGROUND: Previous studies of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), relying on limited numbers of procedures, have not reported VT-free survival in parallel for single and multiple procedures (ie, after the last procedure). Data regarding the impact of RFA on VT burden are scarce. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to provide new insights on clinical outcomes based on a large series of VT ablation procedures from the current era in ARVC patients. METHODS: We evaluated consecutive patients with definite ARVC who underwent RFA procedures between 2009 and 2019 at our center. We assessed VT-free survival, for single and multiple procedures, and changes in VT burden and antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) after RFA. RESULTS: Among 116 patients, there were 166 RFA procedures, 106 (63.9%) of which involved epicardial ablation. Cumulative freedom from VT after a single procedure was 68.6% and 49.8% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Cumulative VT-free survival after multiple procedures was 81.8% and 69.6% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. VT burden per RFA was reduced after vs before ablation (mean 0.7 vs 10.0 events/year; P <.001). Furthermore, VT burden per patient was reduced after last ablation vs before first ablation (mean 0.5 vs 10.9 events/year; P <.001). Use of AADs decreased after ablation (22.2% vs 51.9%; P <.001). CONCLUSION: In ARVC patients, RFA provided good VT-free survival after a single procedure, with multiple procedures required for more sustained freedom from VT recurrence. Marked reduction in VT burden permitted discontinuation of AADs.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), relying on limited numbers of procedures, have not reported VT-free survival in parallel for single and multiple procedures (ie, after the last procedure). Data regarding the impact of RFA on VT burden are scarce. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to provide new insights on clinical outcomes based on a large series of VT ablation procedures from the current era in ARVC patients. METHODS: We evaluated consecutive patients with definite ARVC who underwent RFA procedures between 2009 and 2019 at our center. We assessed VT-free survival, for single and multiple procedures, and changes in VT burden and antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) after RFA. RESULTS: Among 116 patients, there were 166 RFA procedures, 106 (63.9%) of which involved epicardial ablation. Cumulative freedom from VT after a single procedure was 68.6% and 49.8% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Cumulative VT-free survival after multiple procedures was 81.8% and 69.6% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. VT burden per RFA was reduced after vs before ablation (mean 0.7 vs 10.0 events/year; P <.001). Furthermore, VT burden per patient was reduced after last ablation vs before first ablation (mean 0.5 vs 10.9 events/year; P <.001). Use of AADs decreased after ablation (22.2% vs 51.9%; P <.001). CONCLUSION: In ARVC patients, RFA provided good VT-free survival after a single procedure, with multiple procedures required for more sustained freedom from VT recurrence. Marked reduction in VT burden permitted discontinuation of AADs.