Literature DB >> 33933243

A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Health Economic Evaluations of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening Strategies.

Anh Le Tuan Nguyen1, Hoa Thi Thu Nguyen1, Kwang Chien Yee2, Andrew J Palmer3, Christopher Leigh Blizzard1, Barbara de Graaff4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Many economic evaluations of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screenings have been conducted; however, these vary substantially with regards to screening strategies, patient group, and setting. This review aims to report the current knowledge of the cost-effectiveness of screening and describe the published data.
METHODS: We conducted a search of biomedical and health economic databases up to July 2020. We included full and partial health economic studies if they evaluated the costs or outcomes of HCC screening strategies.
RESULTS: The review included 43 studies. Due to significant heterogeneity in key aspects across the studies, a narrative synthesis was conducted. Most studies reported using ultrasound or alpha fetoprotein as screening strategies. Screening intervals were mostly annual or biannual. Incidence, diagnostic performance, and health state utility values were the most critical parameters affecting the cost-effectiveness of screening. The majority of studies reported HCC screening to be cost-effective, with the biannual ultrasound + alpha fetoprotein standing out as the most cost-effective strategy. However, few studies considered the utilization rate, and none considered the diagnostic performance of ultrasound in the context of central adiposity. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were also evaluated, but its cost-effectiveness was still controversial.
CONCLUSIONS: Although many studies suggested HCC screening was cost-effective, substantial limitations of the quality of these studies means the results should be interpreted with caution. Future modeling studies should consider the impact of central adiposity on the precision of ultrasound, real-world utilization rates and projections of increased HCC incidence.
Copyright © 2021 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cost-effectiveness; hepatocellular carcinoma; primary liver cancer; screening; surveillance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33933243     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  2 in total

1.  Two-Phase MDCT Protocol for the Screening of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Anita Paisant; Jérôme Boursier; Djamel Dabli; Jérôme Lebigot; Frédéric Oberti; Sophie Michalak; Valérie Vilgrain; Christophe Aubé
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 2.  Screening for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Hepatitis B.

Authors:  Yashasavi Sachar; Mayur Brahmania; Renumathy Dhanasekaran; Stephen E Congly
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 5.048

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.