| Literature DB >> 33933047 |
Aleksina Shatilova1, Larisa Girshova2, Daniil Zaytsev2, Irina Budaeva2, Yuliya Mirolyubova2, Darya Ryzhkova2, Roman Grozov2, Konstantin Bogdanov2, Tatiana Nikulina3, Dmitriy Motorin2, Darina Zammoeva2, Svetlana Efremova3, Vladimir Ivanov3, Alexey Petukhov2, Yuliya Alekseeva3, Andrey Zaritskey3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Myeloid sarcoma (MS) is a very rare condition, develops both in patients with other hematological neoplasms, and as isolated tumor. MS of the gynecologic tract is extremely rare. An available literature data about diagnosis and management of MS is summarized in the article. The role of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgery and bone marrow transplantation in the treatment is discussed. Polychemotherapy and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation were suggested to be the optimal treatment strategy of MS of the gynecological tract. The use of new targeted agents results in promising clinical data. CASEEntities:
Keywords: Acute myeloid leukemia; Hypomethylating agent; Myeloid sarcoma of the uterine cervix; Stem cell transplantation; Venetoclax
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33933047 PMCID: PMC8088676 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-021-01328-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Womens Health ISSN: 1472-6874 Impact factor: 2.742
Fig. 1Immunohistochemical study of MS. a Expression of CD15; b expression of CD45; c expression of CD99; d expression of CD117; e expression of myeloperoxidase, f expression of BCL-2
Fig. 2Dynamics of tumor by FDG-PET/CT. a Study at the onset of the disease; b study after course of induction therapy; c study after course of consolidation therapy; d study after course of specific therapy with Venetoclax and 5-azacitidine
Literature review of myeloid sarcoma involving the gynecologic tract
| No | Authors, country, year of study | Number of cases (n) | Affected region | Concurrent AML | Treatment | % (n) | Duration of observation (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 [ | B. Pathak et al., Canada, 2005 | 25 | Cervix—76% (n = 19) Uterine corpus—8% (n = 2) External genital organs—4% (n = 1) ≥ 2 gynecologic sites—4% (n = 1) Not stated—8% (n = 2) | 48% (n = 12) | CT | 28 (7) | 7.7 |
| RT | 8 (2) | 5 | |||||
| SI | 8 (2) | 3 | |||||
| CT + RT | 24 (6) | 13.75 | |||||
| CT + SI | 8 (2) | 20.5 | |||||
| RT + SI | 4 (1) | 1.75 | |||||
| Without treatment | 16 (4) | < 1 | |||||
| 2 [ | R.M. Kahn et al., USA, 2019 | 1 | ≥ 2 gynecologic sites (uterine corpus, fallopian tubes, left ovary) | Yes | CT + SI | 3 | |
| 3 [ | G.Modi et al., India, 2004 | 1 | External genital organs (vagina) | No | Hypomethylating therapy with decitabine | > 4 | |
| 4 [ | J.-A. Hernández et al., Spain, 2002 | 2 | Cervix, left mesosalpinx, ovaries | 100% (n = 2) | CT + SI + autoBMT | 10 | |
| External genital organs (vagina) | CT + autoBMT | 10 | |||||
| 5 [ | M. Ucar, M. Guryildirim, Turkey, 2014 | 1 | Breast, cervix, uterus | Yes | CT | > 2 | |
| 6 [ | M.G. Garcia et al., USA, Spain, 2006 | 11 | Cervix—27.3% (n = 3) Ovary—18.2% (n = 2) Uterine corpus—9% (n = 1) External genital organs—9% (n = 1) ≥ 2 gynecologic sites—36.5% (n = 4) | 36.5% (n = 4) | CT | 64 (7) | 40 |
| RT | 9 (1) | 5 | |||||
| CT + alloBMT | 9 (1) | > 6 | |||||
| SI | 73 (8) | - | |||||
| 9 | Cervix—11% (n = 1) Ovary—89% (n = 8) | 22% (n = 2) | CT | 33 (3) | 15 | ||
| CT + alloBMT | 11 (1) | 10 | |||||
| 7 [ | S.C.H. Kim et al., France, 2010 | 1 | Cervix | No | CT + RT | > 72 | |
| 8 [ | H. Gill et al., China, 2012 | 1 | Cervix, left pelvic cavity | No | CT | 16 | |
| 9 [ | W. Gui et al., China, 2019 | 2 | Cervix, external genital organs (vagina), intrapelvic lymph nodes | No | SI + CT | 21 | |
| Cervix, uterus, intrapelvic lymph nodes | Yes | CT | 26 | ||||
| 10 [ | A.S. Weingertner et al., France, 2009 | 1 | Cervix, intrapelvic lymph nodes | Yes | CT | > 3 | |
| 11 [ | Y. Yu et al., China, 2015 | 1 | External genital organs (vulva, vagina), cervix | No | CT | 4 | |
| 12 [ | H. Bao et al., China, 2019 | 1 | External genital organs | Yes | SI + CT + alloBMT | > 6 | |
CT chemotherapy, RT radiotherapy, SI surgical intervention, autoBMT autologous bone marrow transplantation, alloBMT allogeneic bone marrow transplantation