Literature DB >> 33932627

Vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2: consider the denominator.

Lydia L Shook1, Ai-Ris Y Collier2, Ilona T Goldfarb3, Khady Diouf4, Babatunde O Akinwunmi5, Nicola Young6, Alec Brown7, Michele R Hacker2, Anjali J Kaimal3, Kathryn J Gray4, Andrea G Edlow3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33932627      PMCID: PMC8081748          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM        ISSN: 2589-9333


× No keyword cloud information.

OBJECTIVE

More than 82,000 pregnant women in the United States have tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Published estimates of the incidence of vertical transmission—the passage of SARS-CoV-2 from the mother to her infant during pregnancy or childbirth—range from 1% to 3%, but these reports may be limited in their methodology.2, 3, 4 To date, the largest systematic review and meta-analysis reports a pooled estimate of 3.2% and includes data from cohort studies and case series published early in the pandemic, when reports on outcomes of newborns with SARS-CoV-2 infection were urgently needed to guide clinical management and potentially overrepresented. Here, we provided additional data on vertical transmission from a multicenter cohort of pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

STUDY DESIGN

Women with a positive nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy who delivered from March 22, 2020, to December 20, 2020, at 1 of 3 hospitals in Boston, MA—Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH), and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC)—were included. These hospitals perform approximately 15,000 deliveries per year, accounting for approximately 75% of annual deliveries in Boston. The Mass General Brigham and BIDMC Institutional Review Boards approved this study. Some of the participants included in this study of vertical transmission have been included in previous studies describing different outcomes. Inpatient universal testing protocols for SARS-CoV-2 were in place in early April 2020 (MGH or BWH) or May 2020 (BIDMC). Outpatient testing was performed by clinical indication, that is, a known exposure or symptoms. Consistent with the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines released on April 2, 2020, neonatal testing by nasopharyngeal PCR was performed at 24 hours of life only in newborns of mothers with SARS-CoV-2 infection who were considered infectious at the time of delivery and at 48 hours or later at the discretion of the provider or infection control.

RESULTS

There was no case of SARS-CoV-2 infection identified in 369 newborns born to 354 women who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy. Of the 369 delivered newborns, 159 newborns (43%) were tested at least once for SARS-CoV-2 during the delivery hospitalization, with 149 newborns (94%) receiving a test at 24 hours of life. Of the 354 women infected with SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy included in this cohort, 140 (40%) delivered within 14 days from diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The median interval from maternal diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection to delivery was 29 days (interquartile range, 2–108). Asymptomatic or mild disease was noted in 259 women (73%). The Table depicts maternal and neonatal characteristics.
Table

Characteristics of pregnant women testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 and frequency of newborn SARS-CoV-2 testing

CharacteristicAll (N=354)MGH (n=144)BWH (n=130)BIDMC (n=80)
Maternal disease severitya
Asymptomatic66 (19)31 (22)22 (17)13 (16)
Mild192 (54)76 (53)75 (58)41 (51)
Moderate59 (17)22 (15)23 (18)14 (18)
Severe25 (7)11 (8)7 (5)7 (8)
Critical12 (3)4 (3)3 (2)5 (6)
GA at diagnosis in completed weeks32 (22–38)32 (23–38)33 (23–37)32 (19–36)
GA at diagnosis by trimester
First37 (10)12 (8)16 (12)9 (11)
Second92 (26)38 (26)29 (22)25 (31)
Third225 (64)94 (65)85 (65)46 (58)
GA at delivery in completed weeks39 (37–39)39 (38–39)39 (37–39)38 (37–39)
Mode of delivery
Vaginal delivery221 (62)89 (62)83 (64)49 (61)
Cesarean delivery133 (38)55 (38)47 (36)31 (39)
Preterm birth (<37 wk)b53 (15)18 (13)18 (14)17 (21)
Days from first positive test to delivery29 (2–108)33 (2–101)27 (2–106)26 (3–113)
Women delivering <14 d from date of diagnosis140 (40)56 (39)49 (38)33 (41)
Total newborns, n36915013584
Positive for SARS-CoV-2c0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Negative for SARS-CoV-2c159 (43)69 (46)60 (44)30 (36)
Not tested for SARS-CoV-2c210 (57)81(54)75 (56)54 (64)
Incidence of vertical transmission, % (95% CI)d0 (0.0–1.0)0 (0.0–2.4)0 (0.0–2.7)0 (0.0–4.3)
Newborns tested for SARS-CoV-2c after birth, n159696030
Tested at 24 h only105 (66)49 (71)38 (63)18 (60)
Tested at 24 h and 48 h–72 h31 (20)15 (22)4 (7)12 (40)
Tested at 24 h and 4 d–14 d13 (8)4 (6)9 (15)0 (0)
Tested at other time points10 (6)1 (1)9 (15)0 (0)

Data are presented as number (percentage) or median (interquartile range), unless otherwise indicated.

BIDMC, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; BWH, Brigham and Women's Hospital; CI, confidence interval; GA, gestational age; MGH, Massachusetts General Hospital.

Shook. Vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2021.

Defined by the National Institute of Health and endorsed by the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Includes both iatrogenic and spontaneous preterm births

By clinically available nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV-2

Number of newborns testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 divided by number of newborns delivered to women with SARS-CoV-2 infection (all hospitals, 369; MGH, 150; BWH, 135; BIDMC, 84). The 95% CI was calculated using the exact (Clopper-Pearson) method.

Characteristics of pregnant women testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 and frequency of newborn SARS-CoV-2 testing Data are presented as number (percentage) or median (interquartile range), unless otherwise indicated. BIDMC, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; BWH, Brigham and Women's Hospital; CI, confidence interval; GA, gestational age; MGH, Massachusetts General Hospital. Shook. Vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2021. Defined by the National Institute of Health and endorsed by the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Includes both iatrogenic and spontaneous preterm births By clinically available nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV-2 Number of newborns testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 divided by number of newborns delivered to women with SARS-CoV-2 infection (all hospitals, 369; MGH, 150; BWH, 135; BIDMC, 84). The 95% CI was calculated using the exact (Clopper-Pearson) method.

CONCLUSION

We identified no case of vertical transmission in our cohort, which includes a large proportion of women with asymptomatic or mild disease. Newborns were tested per hospital infection control policies (eg, not tested if born to convalescent mothers). Although vertical transmission does occur, data from our centers suggest that the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 vertical transmission, as detected via neonatal nasopharyngeal swab, is likely lower than the 1% to 3% estimated incidence in previous reports.2, 3, 4 The challenge in selecting the denominator for calculating the incidence of vertical transmission is illustrated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report on 2869 newborns of women with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy. Test results were available on 610 newborns—only 21% of the cohort—of which 16 (2.6%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. More than 60% of newborns without testing information were delivered >10 days from maternal infection. These newborns either were not tested or had a negative result, which is not mandated to be reported to the state, unlike a positive result. If all newborns born to women with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy were included in the denominator, the incidence of identified vertical transmission would be 0.6% (16 of 2869), not 2.6%. Consensus on how to define, detect, and report vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is lacking. Although both the AAP and CDC recommend testing all infants born to mothers with active SARS-CoV-2 infection at the time of delivery, the optimal strategy for evaluating vertical transmission in the setting of early (first- and second-trimester) pregnancy infections is not known. Although nasopharyngeal PCR-based testing of infants born to convalescent women is likely to be low yield, sampling the fetal compartment during maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection to assess for transmission could incur risk without a clear benefit. Estimates of the incidence of vertical transmission that exclude untested newborns should be interpreted with caution, as untested newborns cannot demonstrate their presumed SARS-CoV-2–negative status. We assert that the appropriate denominator to estimate the incidence of vertical transmission includes all newborns of women with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy.
  1 in total

Review 1.  COVID-19 in pregnancy: implications for fetal brain development.

Authors:  Lydia L Shook; Elinor L Sullivan; Jamie O Lo; Roy H Perlis; Andrea G Edlow
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 15.272

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.