Literature DB >> 33932501

Weak immunogenicity after a single dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in treated cancer patients.

R Palich1, M Veyri2, S Marot3, A Vozy2, J Gligorov4, P Maingon5, A-G Marcelin3, J-P Spano2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33932501      PMCID: PMC8081573          DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


× No keyword cloud information.
Active cancer and ongoing antineoplastic treatments are major factors for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and death; reasons why the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination remains a priority in cancer patients (CPs). However, immunocompromized patients were excluded from major studies on mRNA vaccines, , and could have a decreased response to vaccination, as recently demonstrated in solid organ transplant recipients. Herein, we aimed to assess the proportion of antibody response 4 weeks after the first injection of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine in CPs and health care workers (HCWs) as the control population. All consecutive patients with cancer on active treatment or with treatment in the last 2 years and HCWs who underwent SARS-CoV-2 vaccination between 17 February 2021 and 18 March 2021 at the Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France, were selected for analysis. The titration of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was proposed just before the second injection of BNT162b2 vaccine. Serum anti-nucleoprotein (N) immunoglobulin G (IgG) and anti-spike protein (S) IgG against the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the S1 domain were detected using the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The presence of anti-N IgG was used as a surrogate marker of prior COVID-19. Statistical analysis consisted of univariable analysis (Chi-square tests) and then multivariable analysis (binary logistic regression, including all variables with P value < 0.1 in univariable analysis) to determine the factors associated with the lack of seroconversion in CPs. Median titers of anti-S IgG were compared between CPs and HCWs, using a Mood's test. This study was approved by the Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés (MR004, registration number: 2221945). SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were measured in 110 CPs and 25 HCWs (Table 1 ). In CPs who did not have COVID-19 before vaccination, the seroconversion rate was only 55%, while it reached 100% in HCWs. Titers of anti-S IgG were significantly higher in HCWs in comparison with seropositive CPs (680 versus 315 UA/ml, P = 0.04). Sex, cancer locations and metastatic status were similar in seroconverters and non-seroconverter CPs (Supplementary Table S1, available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.04.020). After adjustment for potential confounders, two factors were strongly associated with no seroconversion: age >65 years [odds ratio 3.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.40-9.15, P = 0.008] and treatment by chemotherapy (odds ratio 4.34, 95% CI 1.67-11.30, P = 0.003).
Table 1

Characteristics of cancer patients and health care workers with SARS-CoV-2 serological outcome

Cancer patients (N = 110)
Sex, n (%)
 Women66 (60)
 Men44 (40)
Age, years, median (IQR)66 (54-74)
Cancer location, n (%)a
 Breast37 (34)
 Lung15 (14)
 Gynecological15 (14)
 Prostate11 (10)
 Digestive8 (7.3)
 Kidney7 (6.4)
 Bladder5 (4.5)
 Upper aero-digestive tract6 (5.5)
 Thyroid5 (4.5)
 Others3 (2.7)
Cancer staging, n (%)
 Local47 (43)
 Metastatic63 (57)
Cancer treatment, n (%)b
 Chemotherapy38 (35)
 Targeted therapy26 (24)
 Immunotherapy17 (16)
 Hormonotherapy16 (15)
 Radiotherapy6 (5.5)
 Clinical surveillance18 (16)
Time between first vaccine injection and SARS-CoV-2 serology, days, median (IQR)27 (26-28)
Positive anti-N IgG, n (%)c15 (14)
Positive anti-S IgG, n (%)c
 In all patients64 (58)
 Among patients with positive anti-N IgG (N = 15)12 (80)
 Among patients with negative anti-N IgG (N = 95)52 (55)
Titer of anti-S IgG, UA/mL, median (IQR)
 In all anti-S positive patients (N = 64)359 (178-998)
 Among patients with positive anti-N IgG (N = 12)657 (366-14, 112)
 Among patients with negative anti-N IgG (N = 52)315 (140-748)

IQR, interquartile range; N, nucleoprotein; S, spike protein; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Two patients had synchronous cancers (prostate + lung and prostate + colon).

Non-exclusive categories.

Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA), with detection threshold: 0.8 UA/ml for anti-N IgG, and detection threshold: 50 UA/ml for anti-S IgG.

Characteristics of cancer patients and health care workers with SARS-CoV-2 serological outcome IQR, interquartile range; N, nucleoprotein; S, spike protein; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Two patients had synchronous cancers (prostate + lung and prostate + colon). Non-exclusive categories. Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA), with detection threshold: 0.8 UA/ml for anti-N IgG, and detection threshold: 50 UA/ml for anti-S IgG. No symptomatic COVID-19 occurred between the two injections of vaccine in CPs and HCWs. In summary, almost half of CPs showed no anti-spike antibody response after the first injection of BNT162b2 vaccine, and this low seroconversion rate could be much worse in elderly patients and in patients under chemotherapy. In comparison, 100% of the HCWs had anti-spike seroconversion. Moreover, even in CPs with seroconversion, the level of antibody response could be lower than expected. In conclusion, our findings argue for not extending the 21-day period between the two SARS-CoV-2 vaccine injections in CPs, and for performing serological monitoring to assess antibody response in this particular population, which could lead to adapting this vaccine strategy. We would also recommend a vaccine strategy including family and friendship circles.
  33 in total

1.  Solid cancer patients achieve adequate immunogenicity and low rate of severe adverse events after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Authors:  Urska Janzic; Urska Bidovec-Stojkovic; Katja Mohorcic; Loredana Mrak; Nina Fokter Dovnik; Marija Ivanovic; Maja Ravnik; Marina Caks; Erik Skof; Jerneja Debeljak; Peter Korosec; Matija Rijavec
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.674

Review 2.  COVID-19 vaccine development: milestones, lessons and prospects.

Authors:  Maochen Li; Han Wang; Lili Tian; Zehan Pang; Qingkun Yang; Tianqi Huang; Junfen Fan; Lihua Song; Yigang Tong; Huahao Fan
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2022-05-03

3.  Efficacy and safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in participants with a history of cancer: subgroup analysis of a global phase 3 randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Stephen J Thomas; John L Perez; Stephen P Lockhart; Subramanian Hariharan; Nicholas Kitchin; Ruth Bailey; Katherine Liau; Eleni Lagkadinou; Özlem Türeci; Ugur Şahin; Xia Xu; Kenneth Koury; Samuel S Dychter; Claire Lu; Teresa C Gentile; William C Gruber
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies Testing in Recipients of COVID-19 Vaccination: Why, When, and How?

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Brandon Michael Henry; Mario Plebani
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-25

5.  Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA vaccines in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Alfredo Addeo; Pankil K Shah; Natacha Bordry; Robert D Hudson; Brenna Albracht; Mariagrazia Di Marco; Virginia Kaklamani; Pierre-Yves Dietrich; Barbara S Taylor; Pierre-Francois Simand; Darpan Patel; Jing Wang; Intidhar Labidi-Galy; Sara Fertani; Robin J Leach; Jose Sandoval; Ruben Mesa; Kate Lathrop; Nicolas Mach; Dimpy P Shah
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 38.585

6.  High seroconversion rate but low antibody titers after two injections of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine in patients treated with chemotherapy for solid cancers.

Authors:  R Palich; M Veyri; A Vozy; S Marot; J Gligorov; M-A Benderra; P Maingon; L Morand-Joubert; Z Adjoutah; A-G Marcelin; J-P Spano; J Barrière
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 51.769

7.  Low neutralizing antibody responses in WM, CLL and NHL patients after the first dose of the BNT162b2 and AZD1222 vaccine.

Authors:  Maria Gavriatopoulou; Evangelos Terpos; Efstathios Kastritis; Alexandros Briasoulis; Sentiljana Gumeni; Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos; Aimilia D Sklirou; Panagiotis Malandrakis; Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou; Magdalini Migkou; Ioannis P Trougakos; Meletios A Dimopoulos
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 5.057

8.  Protocol for SARS-CoV-2 post-vaccine surveillance study in Australian adults and children with cancer: an observational study of safety and serological and immunological response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (SerOzNET).

Authors:  Amy Body; Elizabeth Ahern; Luxi Lal; Karen Gillett; Hesham Abdulla; Stephen Opat; Tracey O'Brien; Peter Downie; Stuart Turville; C Mee Ling Munier; Corey Smith; C Raina MacIntyre; Eva Segelov
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine in Gynecologic Oncology Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Innocenza Palaia; Giuseppe Caruso; Violante Di Donato; Annarita Vestri; Anna Napoli; Giorgia Perniola; Matteo Casinelli; Danilo Alunni Fegatelli; Roberta Campagna; Federica Tomao; Debora D'Aniello; Guido Antonelli; Ludovico Muzii
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-23

10.  Clinical Management of COVID-19 in Cancer Patients with the STAT3 Inhibitor Silibinin.

Authors:  Joaquim Bosch-Barrera; Ariadna Roqué; Eduard Teixidor; Maria Carmen Carmona-Garcia; Aina Arbusà; Joan Brunet; Begoña Martin-Castillo; Elisabet Cuyàs; Sara Verdura; Javier A Menendez
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.