Literature DB >> 3393227

New features of microtubule behaviour observed in vivo.

E Schulze1, M Kirschner.   

Abstract

The microtubule cytoskeleton is thought to be intimately involved in generating and maintaining cell polarity and can generate many different morphological structures from a few structural elements. The mechanism by which these structures are generated has been partially elucidated from studies of microtubule polymerization both in vitro and in vivo. Microtubules in vitro exist in growing (polymerizing) and shrinking (depolymerizing) populations that interconvert infrequently. This behaviour, termed dynamic instability, permits microtubules in the cell rapidly to explore different arrangements and allows selective stabilization of specific morphologies. To investigate the regulation of these processes, we have implemented techniques for direct observation of fluorescently labelled microtubules and developed them to observe the dynamic behaviour of individual microtubules in single living cells. Sammak and Borisy recently used this technique to show that the dynamics of microtubules in fibroblasts is explained by dynamic instability. Although we also conclude here that dynamic instability explains much of microtubule behaviour in vivo, we find significant deviations from the properties of tubulin in vitro. These results suggest that local cytoplasmic factors strongly influence microtubule dynamics; such control has important implications for cellular morphogenesis.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3393227     DOI: 10.1038/334356a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  48 in total

1.  Centrosome reorientation in wound-edge cells is cell type specific.

Authors:  Anne-Marie C Yvon; Jonathan W Walker; Barbara Danowski; Carey Fagerstrom; Alexey Khodjakov; Patricia Wadsworth
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.138

2.  Caenorhabditis elegans EFA-6 limits microtubule growth at the cell cortex.

Authors:  Sean M O'Rourke; Sara N Christensen; Bruce Bowerman
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  The effect of solution composition on microtubule dynamic instability.

Authors:  M J Schilstra; P M Bayley; S R Martin
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1991-08-01       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Centrosomal control of microtubule dynamics.

Authors:  V Rodionov; E Nadezhdina; G Borisy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-01-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Estimation of the diffusion-limited rate of microtubule assembly.

Authors:  D J Odde
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Microtubule release from the centrosome.

Authors:  T J Keating; J G Peloquin; V I Rodionov; D Momcilovic; G G Borisy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Time series characterization of simulated microtubule dynamics in the nerve growth cone.

Authors:  D J Odde; H M Buettner
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  How the transition frequencies of microtubule dynamic instability (nucleation, catastrophe, and rescue) regulate microtubule dynamics in interphase and mitosis: analysis using a Monte Carlo computer simulation.

Authors:  N R Gliksman; R V Skibbens; E D Salmon
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.138

9.  Dynamic instability of microtubules: Monte Carlo simulation and application to different types of microtubule lattice.

Authors:  S R Martin; M J Schilstra; P M Bayley
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 10.  Robert Feulgen Prize Lecture 1995. Electronic light microscopy: present capabilities and future prospects.

Authors:  D M Shotton
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.304

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.