| Literature DB >> 33931702 |
Chunyan Liu1,2, Muhammad Usman Khan3, Muhammad Ramzan1,3, Yu-Ming Chu4,5, Seifedine Kadry6, M Y Malik7, Ronnason Chinram8.
Abstract
Studies accentuating nanomaterials suspensions and flow traits in the view of their applications are the focus of the present study. Especially, the usage of such materials in biomedical rheological models has achieved great importance. The nanofluids' role is essential in the cooling of small electronic gizmos like microchips and akin devices. Having such exciting and practical applications of nanofluids our goal is to scrutinize the Maxwell MHD nanofluid flow over an extended cylinder with nonlinear thermal radiation amalgamated with chemical reaction in a Darcy-Forchheimer spongy media. The presence of gyrotactic microorganisms is engaged to stabilize the nanoparticles in the fluid. The partial slip condition is considered at the boundary of the stretching cylinder. The Buongiorno nanofluid model is betrothed with impacts of the Brownian motion and thermophoresis. The analysis of entropy generation is also added to the problem. The highly nonlinear system is tackled numerically is addressed by the bvp4c built-in function of the MATLAB procedure. The outcomes of the prominent parameters versus embroiled profiles are portrayed and conversed deeming their physical significance. It is perceived that fluid temperature is augmented for large estimates of the radiation and Darcy parameters. Moreover, it is noticed that the magnetic and wall roughness parameters lower the fluid velocity. To corroborate the presented results, a comparison of the current study with a previously published paper is also executed. An outstanding correlation in this regard is attained.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33931702 PMCID: PMC8087771 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88947-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
A literature analysis for the individuality of the stated model.
| Authors | Buongiorno model | Maxwell nanofluid flow over a cylinder | Darcy–Forchheimer impact | Nonlinear thermal radiation | Bioconve-ction | Chemical reaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Islam et al.[ | √ | √ | × | × | × | × |
| Ahmed et al.[ | √ | √ | × | √ | × | × |
| Hayat et al.[ | √ | √ | × | × | × | √ |
| Raju et al.[ | √ | √ | × | × | × | × |
| Present | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
(√) means said effect present, and ( ×) signifies the impact is absent.
Figure 1The geometry of the flow.
Figure 2Plot of for .
Figure 3Plot of for .
Figure 4Plot of for .
Figure 5Plot of for .
Figure 6Plot of for .
Figure 7Plot of for .
Figure 8Plot of for .
Figure 9Plot of for .
Figure 10Plot of for .
Figure 11Plot of for .
Figure 12Plot of for .
Figure 13Plot of for .
Figure 14Behaviour of for .
Figure 15Plot of for .
Figure 16Plot of for .
Figure 17Plot of for .
Figure 18Plot of for .
Figure 19Plot of for .
Figure 20Plot of for .
Figure 21Plot of for .
Figure 22Plot of for .
Validation of numerical outcomes for with Khan and Mustafa[68] and Tamoor et al.[56] and when = = 0.
| K | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| [ | [ | Present | |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 0.2 | 1.0198039 | 1.01980 | 1.01981 |
| 0.5 | 1.1180340 | 1.11803 | 1.11803 |
| 0.8 | 1.2806248 | 1.28063 | 1.28062 |
| 1 | 1.4142136 | 1.41421 | 1.41421 |
Computations of for various variations of , , , when = 7 and = = 0.5.
| 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 0.7654 | |
| 1 | 0.6803 | |||
| 1.5 | 0.5851 | |||
| 2 | 0.5003 | |||
| 0.5 | 0.7745 | |||
| 0.7 | 0.7801 | |||
| 1 | 0.7883 | |||
| 2 | 1.1440 | |||
| 2.5 | 1.4871 | |||
| 3 | 1.7770 | |||
| 0.1 | 1.3736 | |||
| 0.3 | 2.2339 | |||
| 0.5 | 3.3713 |
Computations of for numerous variations of ,, and when = 7, = 0.5 and = = = 0.5.
| 0.2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1.15817 |
| 0.5 | 1.17480 | |||
| 0.7 | 1.18683 | |||
| 1 | 1.20568 | |||
| 2 | 0.97565 | |||
| 3 | 1.05478 | |||
| 7 | 1.22726 | |||
| 2 | 1.27036 | |||
| 3 | 1.34142 | |||
| 4 | 1.39264 | |||
| 2 | 0.99641 | |||
| 3 | 0.92496 | |||
| 5 | 0.87854 |
Computations of for various variations of , , , and .
| 0.3 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.935596 |
| 0.6 | 1.059580 | ||||
| 0.9 | 1.193600 | ||||
| 1.0 | 0.915801 | ||||
| 1.5 | 0.935596 | ||||
| 2.0 | 0.940771 | ||||
| 0.2 | 0.935596 | ||||
| 0.4 | 1.012580 | ||||
| 0.6 | 1.089560 | ||||
| 0.4 | 1.065290 | ||||
| 0.5 | 1.189010 | ||||
| 0.6 | 1.307130 | ||||
| 0.3 | 0.963155 | ||||
| 0.6 | 1.038210 | ||||
| 0.9 | 1.103780 |