Angel Moran1, Yichuan Wang2, Brandon A Dyer3, Stephen S F Yip4, Megan E Daly1, Tokihiro Yamamoto5. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA. 2. Department of Statistics, University of California Davis, Davis, CA. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA. 4. AIQ Solutions Inc, Madison, WI. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA. Electronic address: toyamamoto@ucdavis.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We investigated whether adding computed tomography (CT) and/or 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET radiomics features to conventional prognostic factors (CPFs) improves prognostic value in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 39 cases with stage III NSCLC who received chemoradiotherapy and underwent planning CT and staging 18F-FDG PET scans. Seven CPFs were recorded. Feature selection was performed on 48 CT and 49 PET extracted radiomics features. A penalized multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to generate models for overall survival based on CPFs alone, CPFs with CT features, CPFs with PET features, and CPFs with CT and PET features. Linear predictors generated and categorized into 2 risk groups for which Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated. A log-rank test was performed to quantify the discrimination between the groups and calculated the Harrell's C-index to quantify the discriminatory power. A likelihood ratio test was performed to determine whether adding CT and/or PET features to CPFs improved model performance. RESULTS: All 4 models significantly discriminated between the 2 risk groups. The discriminatory power was significantly increased when CPFs were combined with PET features (C-index 0.82; likelihood ratio test P < .01) or with both CT and PET features (0.83; P < .01) compared with CPFs alone (0.68). There was no significant improvement when CPFs were combined with CT features (0.68). CONCLUSION: Adding PET radiomics features to CPFs yielded a significant improvement in the prognostic value in locally advanced NSCLC; adding CT features did not.
INTRODUCTION: We investigated whether adding computed tomography (CT) and/or 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET radiomics features to conventional prognostic factors (CPFs) improves prognostic value in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 39 cases with stage III NSCLC who received chemoradiotherapy and underwent planning CT and staging 18F-FDG PET scans. Seven CPFs were recorded. Feature selection was performed on 48 CT and 49 PET extracted radiomics features. A penalized multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to generate models for overall survival based on CPFs alone, CPFs with CT features, CPFs with PET features, and CPFs with CT and PET features. Linear predictors generated and categorized into 2 risk groups for which Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated. A log-rank test was performed to quantify the discrimination between the groups and calculated the Harrell's C-index to quantify the discriminatory power. A likelihood ratio test was performed to determine whether adding CT and/or PET features to CPFs improved model performance. RESULTS: All 4 models significantly discriminated between the 2 risk groups. The discriminatory power was significantly increased when CPFs were combined with PET features (C-index 0.82; likelihood ratio test P < .01) or with both CT and PET features (0.83; P < .01) compared with CPFs alone (0.68). There was no significant improvement when CPFs were combined with CT features (0.68). CONCLUSION: Adding PET radiomics features to CPFs yielded a significant improvement in the prognostic value in locally advanced NSCLC; adding CT features did not.
Authors: C A Perez; T F Pajak; P Rubin; J R Simpson; M Mohiuddin; L W Brady; R Perez-Tamayo; M Rotman Journal: Cancer Date: 1987-06-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: David V Fried; Susan L Tucker; Shouhao Zhou; Zhongxing Liao; Osama Mawlawi; Geoffrey Ibbott; Laurence E Court Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-09-11 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Stephen Yip; Keisha McCall; Michalis Aristophanous; Aileen B Chen; Hugo J W L Aerts; Ross Berbeco Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Hugo J W L Aerts; Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Chintan Parmar; Patrick Grossmann; Sara Carvalho; Sara Cavalho; Johan Bussink; René Monshouwer; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Derek Rietveld; Frank Hoebers; Michelle M Rietbergen; C René Leemans; Andre Dekker; John Quackenbush; Robert J Gillies; Philippe Lambin Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 14.919