Literature DB >> 33931242

Continuity of care and receipt of aggressive end of life care among women dying of ovarian cancer.

Megan A Mullins1, Julie J Ruterbusch2, Philippa Clarke3, Shitanshu Uppal4, Michele L Cote2, Lauren P Wallner5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between post-diagnosis continuity of care and receipt of aggressive end of life care among women dying of ovarian cancer.
METHODS: This retrospective claims analysis included 6680 Medicare beneficiaries over age 66 with ovarian cancer who survived at least one year after diagnosis, had at least 4 outpatient evaluation and management visits and died between 2000 and 2016. We calculated the Bice-Boxerman Continuity of Care Index (COC) for each woman, and split COC into tertiles (high, medium, low). We compared late or no hospice use, >1 emergency department (ED) visit, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, >1 hospitalization, terminal hospitalization, chemotherapy, and invasive and/or life extending procedures among women with high or medium vs. low COC using multivariable adjusted logistic regression.
RESULTS: In this sample, 49.8% of women received aggressive care in the last month of life. Compared to women with low COC, women with high COC had 66% higher odds of chemotherapy (adjusted OR 1.66 CI 1.23-2.24) in the last two weeks of life. Women with high COC also had 16% greater odds of not enrolling in hospice compared to women with low COC (adjusted OR 1.16 CI 1.01-1.33). COC was not associated with late enrollment in hospice, hospital utilization, or aggressive procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: COC at the end of life is complicated and may pose unique challenges in providing quality end of life care. Future work exploring the specific facets of continuity associated with quality end of life care is needed.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuity of care; Hospice care; Ovarian cancer; Terminal care

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33931242      PMCID: PMC8222069          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.04.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.304


  38 in total

Review 1.  Identifying potential indicators of the quality of end-of-life cancer care from administrative data.

Authors:  Craig C Earle; Elyse R Park; Bonnie Lai; Jane C Weeks; John Z Ayanian; Susan Block
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review.

Authors:  Jeannie L Haggerty; Robert J Reid; George K Freeman; Barbara H Starfield; Carol E Adair; Rachael McKendry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-22

3.  Factors important to patients' quality of life at the end of life.

Authors:  Baohui Zhang; Matthew E Nilsson; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-08-13

4.  Escalation of oncologic services at the end of life among patients with gynecologic cancer at an urban, public hospital.

Authors:  Eijean Wu; Anna Rogers; Lingyun Ji; Richard Sposto; Terry Church; Lynda Roman; Debu Tripathy; Yvonne G Lin
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Ego bias, reverse ego bias, and physicians' prognostic.

Authors:  R M Poses; D K McClish; C Bekes; W E Scott; J N Morley
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Potential for cancer related health services research using a linked Medicare-tumor registry database.

Authors:  A L Potosky; G F Riley; J D Lubitz; R M Mentnech; L G Kessler
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Trends in the aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life.

Authors:  Craig C Earle; Bridget A Neville; Mary Beth Landrum; John Z Ayanian; Susan D Block; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Continuity of care and intensive care unit use at the end of life.

Authors:  Gulshan Sharma; Jean Freeman; Dong Zhang; James S Goodwin
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-01-12

9.  The effect on survival of continuing chemotherapy to near death.

Authors:  Akiko M Saito; Mary Beth Landrum; Bridget A Neville; John Z Ayanian; Craig C Earle
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  Trends and racial disparities in aggressive end-of-life care for a national sample of women with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Megan A Mullins; Julie J Ruterbusch; Philippa Clarke; Shitanshu Uppal; Lauren P Wallner; Michele L Cote
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 6.921

View more
  1 in total

1.  Duration of palliative care involvement and immunotherapy treatment near the end of life among patients with cancer who died in-hospital.

Authors:  Juline Auclair; Stéphane Sanchez; Jan Chrusciel; Louise Hannetel; Matthieu Frasca; Guillaume Economos; Raphaelle Habert-Dantigny; Eduardo Bruera; Benoit Burucoa; Fiona Ecarnot; Isabelle Colombet; Cécile Barbaret
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.603

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.