| Literature DB >> 33931070 |
Rui Wang1,2,3, Chengyan Chu1,4, Zhiliang Wei1,5, Lin Chen1,5, Jiadi Xu1,5, Yajie Liang4, Miroslaw Janowski4, Robert D Stevens1,2,5, Piotr Walczak6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cell transplantation-based treatments for neurological disease are promising, yet graft rejection remains a major barrier to successful regenerative therapies. Our group and others have shown that long-lasting tolerance of transplanted stem cells can be achieved in the brain with systemic application of monoclonal antibodies blocking co-stimulation signaling. However, it is unknown if subsequent injury and the blood-brain barrier breach could expose the transplanted cells to systemic immune system spurring fulminant rejection and fatal encephalitis. Therefore, we investigated whether delayed traumatic brain injury (TBI) could trigger graft rejection.Entities:
Keywords: Co-stimulation blockade; Glial-restricted progenitors; Immunological tolerance; Neuroinflammation; Traumatic brain injury
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33931070 PMCID: PMC8088005 DOI: 10.1186/s12974-021-02152-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuroinflammation ISSN: 1742-2094 Impact factor: 8.322
Fig. 1The experimental schematic diagram
Fig. 2Survival of transplanted mGRPs monitored by BLI. a Representative BLI scans of mice transplanted with GRPs at indicated time points. b Quantification of BLI signal for each group. Statistically significant difference in WT + GRPs + CoB (*p < 0.05, n = 5) and Shi + GRPs + CoB (#p < 0.05, n = 5) compared with WT + GRPs
Fig. 3TBI induces anxiety-like behavior in open-field test. a Representative trace plots from one mouse in each group during performance of an open-field test. b The time spent in the center during tests at indicated week (weeks − 1 and 0 were designated as the day prior to TBI and the date of TBI, respectively) was normalized to the baseline (prior to TBI). *p < 0.05 compared with the different points post-TBI in each group
Fig. 4MRI and HE staining for TBI lesion assessment. Representative MR images a and HE staining b of mice subjected to TBI. Quantification of TBI lesion based on MRI (c, n = 3/group) and HE staining (d, n = 5/group). NS, no significant difference; **p < 0.01
Fig. 5Immunofluorescence for grafted PLP-GFP cells before and after TBI. A, B Brain sections from the WT + GRPs + CoB and Shi + GRPs + CoB group at 12 weeks of age (before TBI). C Quantitative analysis of the mean intensity of GFP fluorescence in different groups. D, E 28 days after TBI, brain sections exhibited the distribution of grafted cells (PLP-GFP, green). d’, e’ Insets from D and E, respectively. F Quantitation of ipsi/contralateral fluorescence intensity in each group before and after TBI. n = 5/group, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
Fig. 6Histological assessment of neuroinflammation. a–c Representative images of IBA1, GFAP, and CD45 fluorescent staining for neuroinflammation. d–f Quantitative analysis of the ipsi-/contralateral IBA1, GFAP fluorescence intensity and CD45+ cell number between the WT and at 28 days post-TBI. n = 6/group, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01