| Literature DB >> 33930734 |
Abstract
Novel corona-virus (nCOV) has been declared as a pandemic that started from the city Wuhan of China. This deadly virus is infecting people rapidly and has targeted 4.93 million people across the world, with 227 K people being infected only in Italy. Cases of nCOV are quickly increasing whereas the number of nCOV test kits available in hospitals are limited. Under these conditions, an automated system for the classification of patients into nCOV positive and negative cases, is a much needed tool against the pandemic, helping in a selective use of the limited number of test kits. In this research, Convolutional Neural Network-based models (one block VGG, two block VGG, three block VGG, four block VGG, LetNet-5, AlexNet, and Resnet-50) have been employed for the detection of Corona-virus and SARS_MERS infected patients, distinguishing them from the healthy subjects, using lung X-ray scans, which has proven to be a challenging task, due to overlapping characteristics of different corona virus types. Furthermore, LSTM model has been used for time series forecasting of nCOV cases, in the following 10 days, in Italy. The evaluation results obtained, proved that the VGG1 model distinguishes the three classes at an accuracy of almost 91%, as compared to other models, whereas the approach based on the LSTM predicts the number of nCOV cases with 99% accuracy.Entities:
Keywords: Convolutional Neural Networks; LSTM; NCOV; VGG-16
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33930734 PMCID: PMC8062905 DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2021.101921
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Med Imaging Graph ISSN: 0895-6111 Impact factor: 4.790
Fig. 1Male vs. Female COVID-19 deaths (W. Health Organization, 2020).
Fig. 2Comparison study of COVID-19, SARS and MERS mortality rate (nbcnews, 2020).
Detailed description of Related work on different nCOV applications.
| Sr. | Ref | Year | Proposed technique | Dataset | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | AI enabled smartphone framework | CT images | Gained above 90% accuracy | |
| 2 | 2020 | MC Dropweights Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks | chest X-ray | Obtained high accuracy rates | |
| 3 | 2020 | Deep CNN models | chest X-ray | Achieved 80% accurate results. | |
| 4 | 2020 | Cloud-based software called nferX | Biomedical documents | Gained highly accurate results | |
| 5 | 2020 | DNN called ChemAI | Databases of drug-discovery | Obtained high accuracy rates | |
| 6 | 2020 | Deep learning algorithm | CT scans of the chest | Achieved maximum accuracy rates | |
| 7 | 2020 | Image-based system | CT scans of lungs | Gained better accuracy than earlier method | |
| 8 | 2020 | SVM | CT images | Obtained 98.27% accuracy | |
| 9 | 2020 | RNN with Transfer Learning (TL) | CT scan and X-ray images | Came up with 98.78% accurate results | |
| 10 | 2020 | Domain Extension Transfer Learning (DETL) | X-ray images of chest | Achieved 95:3% accuracy rate | |
| 11 | 2020 | DCNNs | CT and X-ray images | Obtained 99% accurate results | |
| 12 | 2020 | Deep leaning methods | CXR images | Showed best scores as compared to other models | |
| 13 | 2020 | VHP (Virus Host Prediction) | DNA sequence | Achieved maximum accuracy rates | |
| 14 | 2020 | AI-based deep learning techniques | CT scan images | Showed up 82.9% accuracy. | |
| 15 | 2020 | CT diagnosis system (DeepPneumonia) | CT images | Obtained highly accurate results | |
| 16 | 2020 | Deep learning-based method | Unsigned images | Gained 95.24% accuracy | |
| 17 | 2020 | CNN | Genome sequences | Came up with accuracy of 98.75% | |
| 18 | 2020 | CNN | X-ray and CT scan images | Showed up high accuracy. | |
| 19 | 2020 | Algorithms of AI | CT scan images | Gained above 90% accurate results | |
| 20 | 2020 | Deep learning-based RNN | Delta, alpha, gamma and beta spike sequences | Gained highy effective and accurate results | |
| 21 | 2020 | Molecule Transformer-Drug Target Interaction (MT-DTI) | Antiviral drugs | Achieved maximum accuracy rates | |
| 22 | 2020 | AI and blockchain | Surveys | Obtained effective results | |
| 23 | 2020 | Q-deformed entropy | CT scan images of lungs | Gained an accuracy of 99.68% | |
| 24 | 2020 | Deep learning techniques | ACE2 RNA | Came up with best accuracy rates | |
| 25 | 2020 | DFCNN | Sequences of RNA virus | Showed up highly effective results | |
| 26 | 2020 | Deep learning-based CNN | X-ray images | Obtained effective and accurate results | |
| 27 | 2020 | Pharmacology-based network | HCoV whole genomes | Gained better accuracy |
Fig. 3Architecture of LeNet-5 containing maximum 256 vector length.
Fig. 4VGG-16 network architecture with 5 convolutional layers.
Fig. 5Inception model network architecture that can be combined with the VGG-16.
Fig. 6Resnet architecture with 5 convolutional layers.
Detailed description of X-ray images data set used for experimentation.
| Classes | Number of images |
|---|---|
| nCov | 45 |
| SARS_MERS | 49 |
| Normal | 51 |
| 145 |
Fig. 7Samples of X-ray images dataset regarding 3 underlying classes.
Numerical results obtained using one block VGG, two-block VGG, three-block VGG and LeNet-5.
| VGG1 | VGG2 | LeNet-5 | VGG3 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precision | Recall | F1 | Precision | Recall | F1 | Precision | Recall | F1 | Precision | Recall | F1 | |
| nCOV | 83 | 100 | 91 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 100 | 70 | 82 | 80 | 80 | 80 |
| NORMAL | 83 | 83 | 83 | 75 | 100 | 86 | 86 | 100 | 92 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| SARS-MERS | 100 | 86 | 92 | 92 | 79 | 85 | 81 | 93 | 87 | 87 | 87 | 87 |
| Weighted Mean Accuracy | 91 | 90 | 90 | 88 | 87 | 87 | 88 | 87 | 86 | 87 | 87 | 87 |
Numerical results obtained using four-block VGG, AlexNet and ResNet-50.
| VGG4 | AlexNet | ResNet-50 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precision | Recall | F1 | Precision | Recall | F1 | Precision | Recall | F1 | |
| nCOV | 67 | 100 | 80 | 75 | 60 | 67 | 71 | 50 | 59 |
| NORMAL | 75 | 100 | 86 | 100 | 83 | 91 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| SARS-MERS | 100 | 50 | 67 | 71 | 86 | 77 | 71 | 86 | 77 |
| Weighted Mean Accuracy | 84 | 77 | 75 | 78 | 77 | 77 | 77 | 77 | 76 |
Fig. 8Accuracy curves for VGG1 model.
Fig. 9Obtained confusion matrix for VGG1 model.
Fig. 10AlexNet model – loss curve for 100 epochs.
Fig. 11Obtained confusion matrix for AlexNet model.
Fig. 12Accuracy curves for ResNet-50 model.
Fig. 13Obtained confusion matrix for ResNet-50 model.
nCOV forecasting results for Italy up to 2020-05-29.
| Date | Actual | Predicted | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-10 | 219,070 | 220,051.4 | 210,990.8 | 229,111.9 |
| 2020-05-11 | 219,814 | 221,350.3 | 212,289.7 | 230,410.8 |
| 2020-05-12 | 221,216 | 222,603.1 | 213,542.5 | 231,663.6 |
| 2020-05-13 | 222,104 | 223,809.2 | 214,748.6 | 232,869.7 |
| 2020-05-14 | 223,096 | 224,998.6 | 215,938 | 234,059.1 |
| 2020-05-15 | 223,885 | 226,179.2 | 217,118.7 | 235,239.8 |
| 2020-05-16 | 224,760 | 227,358.8 | 218,298.3 | 236,419.3 |
| 2020-05-17 | 225,435 | 228,517.2 | 219,456.7 | 237,577.8 |
| 2020-05-18 | 225,886 | 229,654.5 | 220,594 | 238,715.1 |
| 2020-05-19 | 226,699 | 230,775.1 | 221,714.6 | 239,835.7 |
| 2020-05-20 | – | 231,890.8 | 222,830.3 | 240,951.4 |
| 2020-05-21 | – | 232,961.4 | 223,900.8 | 242,021.9 |
| 2020-05-22 | – | 234,012.7 | 224,952.1 | 243,073.2 |
| 2020-05-23 | – | 235,046.3 | 225,985.8 | 244,106.9 |
| 2020-05-24 | – | 236,064.6 | 227,004.1 | 245,125.2 |
| 2020-05-25 | – | 237,067.5 | 228,006.9 | 246,128 |
| 2020-05-26 | – | 238,054.5 | 228,994 | 247,115.1 |
| 2020-05-27 | – | 239,025.1 | 229,964.6 | 248,085.7 |
| 2020-05-28 | – | 239,979.6 | 230,919.1 | 249,040.2 |
| 2020-05-29 | – | 240,918.4 | 231,857.8 | 249,978.9 |
Fig. 14Summary of nCOV confirmed, recovered and death cases from January 22, 2020 to May 20, 2020, in Italy.
Fig. 15Line curves for predicted vs. actual cases obtained by employing LSTM.