Literature DB >> 33930159

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Pediatric Cancer Registration Trials: A US Food and Drug Administration Perspective.

Meena N Murugappan1, Bellinda L King-Kallimanis2, Gregory H Reaman2, Vishal Bhatnagar2, Erica G Horodniceanu2, Najat Bouchkouj2, Paul G Kluetz2.   

Abstract

Pediatric patient-reported outcome (PRO) data can help inform the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) benefit-risk assessment of cancer therapeutics by quantifying symptom and functional outcomes from the patient's perspective. This study assessed use of PROs in commercial pediatric oncology trials submitted to the FDA for regulatory review. FDA databases were searched to identify pediatric oncology product applications approved between 1997 and 2020. Sponsor-submitted documents were reviewed to determine whether PRO data were collected, which instruments were used, and the quality of collected data (ie, sample size, completion rates, and use of fit-for-purpose instruments). The role of PROs in each trial (endpoint hierarchy) was also recorded in addition to whether any PRO endpoints were included in product labeling. We reviewed 17 pediatric oncology applications, 4 of which included PRO data: denosumab, tisagenlecleucel, larotrectinib, and selumetinib. In these 4 instances, PROs served as exploratory endpoints and were not incorporated in product labeling. Trials that collected PRO data were phase II or phase I/II single-arm studies with sample sizes of 28 to 88 patients. Symptomatic adverse events (AEs) were characterized using clinician-reported Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) without additional patient self-report. PROs were infrequently used in pediatric cancer registration trials. When PROs were used, PRO data were limited by lack of a clear research objective and corresponding prospective statistical analysis plan. Contemporary PRO symptom libraries, such as the National Cancer Institute's Pediatric PRO-CTCAE, may provide an opportunity to better evaluate the occurrence and impact of symptomatic AEs, from the patient's perspective, in pediatric oncology trials. Published by Oxford University Press 2021. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 33930159      PMCID: PMC8755487          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  30 in total

Review 1.  Proxy evaluation of health-related quality of life: a conceptual framework for understanding multiple proxy perspectives.

Authors:  A Simon Pickard; Sara J Knight
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Development of the National Cancer Institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE).

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Bryce B Reeve; Sandra A Mitchell; Steven B Clauser; Lori M Minasian; Amylou C Dueck; Tito R Mendoza; Jennifer Hay; Thomas M Atkinson; Amy P Abernethy; Deborah W Bruner; Charles S Cleeland; Jeff A Sloan; Ram Chilukuri; Paul Baumgartner; Andrea Denicoff; Diane St Germain; Ann M O'Mara; Alice Chen; Joseph Kelaghan; Antonia V Bennett; Laura Sit; Lauren Rogak; Allison Barz; Diane B Paul; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Overall Survival Results of a Trial Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes for Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Allison M Deal; Amylou C Dueck; Howard I Scher; Mark G Kris; Clifford Hudis; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Drug Development and US Regulatory Review: Perspectives From Industry, the Food and Drug Administration, and the Patient.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Cindy Geoghegan; Stephen Joel Coons; Ari Gnanasakthy; Ashley F Slagle; Elektra J Papadopoulos; Paul G Kluetz
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 31.777

5.  Pediatric patient-reported outcome instruments for research to support medical product labeling: report of the ISPOR PRO good research practices for the assessment of children and adolescents task force.

Authors:  Louis S Matza; Donald L Patrick; Anne W Riley; John J Alexander; Luis Rajmil; Andreas M Pleil; Monika Bullinger
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 6.  Electronic toxicity monitoring and patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Ethan M Basch; Bryce B Reeve; Sandra A Mitchell; Stephen B Clauser; Lori Minasian; Laura Sit; Ram Chilukuri; Paul Baumgartner; Lauren Rogak; Emily Blauel; Amy P Abernethy; Deborah Bruner
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

7.  Development and validation of the English Pain Interference Index and Pain Interference Index-Parent report.

Authors:  Staci Martin; Shawn Nelson Schmitt; Pamela L Wolters; Brittany Abel; Mary Anne Toledo-Tamula; Andrea Baldwin; Rikard K Wicksell; Melinda Merchant; Brigitte Widemann
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 8.  Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors.

Authors:  D Howell; S Molloy; K Wilkinson; E Green; K Orchard; K Wang; J Liberty
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Eliciting the child's voice in adverse event reporting in oncology trials: Cognitive interview findings from the Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events initiative.

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve; Molly McFatrich; Laura C Pinheiro; Meaghann S Weaver; Lillian Sung; Janice S Withycombe; Justin N Baker; Jennifer W Mack; Mia K Waldron; Deborah Gibson; Deborah Tomlinson; David R Freyer; Catriona Mowbray; Shana Jacobs; Diana Palma; Christa E Martens; Stuart H Gold; Kathryn D Jackson; Pamela S Hinds
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.167

10.  Patient-Reported Outcomes in Pediatric Oncology: The Patient Voice as a Gold Standard.

Authors:  Allison Barz Leahy; Angela Steineck
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 16.193

View more
  4 in total

1.  Lack of Concordance in Symptomatic Adverse Event Reporting by Children, Clinicians, and Caregivers: Implications for Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  David R Freyer; Li Lin; Jennifer W Mack; Scott H Maurer; Molly McFatrich; Justin N Baker; Shana S Jacobs; Nicole Lucas; Janice S Withycombe; Deborah Tomlinson; Katie Rose Villabroza; Mia K Waldron; Pamela S Hinds; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 50.717

2.  Clinical and humanistic burden among pediatric patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 and plexiform neurofibroma in the USA.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Yang; Hyun Kyoo Yoo; Suvina Amin; Wendy Y Cheng; Sanjana Sundaresan; Lujia Zhang; Mei Sheng Duh
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 1.532

3.  Use of Daily Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in Pediatric Cancer Care.

Authors:  Andreas Meryk; Gabriele Kropshofer; Benjamin Hetzer; David Riedl; Jens Lehmann; Gerhard Rumpold; Alexandra Haid; Verena Schneeberger-Carta; Bernhard Holzner; Roman Crazzolara
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-07-01

Review 4.  A review of patient-reported outcomes used for regulatory approval of oncology medicinal products in the European Union between 2017 and 2020.

Authors:  Maria Manuel Teixeira; Fábio Cardoso Borges; Paula Sousa Ferreira; João Rocha; Bruno Sepodes; Carla Torre
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.