| Literature DB >> 33930028 |
Hilary Bower1, Mubarak El Karsany2,3, Abd Alhadi Adam Hussein Adam4, Mubarak Ibrahim Idriss5, Ma'aaza Abasher Alzain6, Mohamed Elamin Ahmed Alfakiyousif2, Rehab Mohamed2, Iman Mahmoud2, Omer Albadri7, Suha Abdulaziz Alnour Mahmoud8, Orwa Ibrahim Abdalla8, Mawahib Eldigail2, Nuha Elagib2, Ulrike Arnold1, Bernardo Gutierrez9, Oliver G Pybus9, Daniel P Carter10, Steven T Pullan10, Shevin T Jacob11, Tajeldin Mohammedein Abdallah4,8, Benedict Gannon1, Tom E Fletcher11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The public health impact of Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is often underestimated. Usually considered a mild condition of short duration, recent outbreaks have reported greater incidence of severe illness, fatality, and longer-term disability. In 2018/19, Eastern Sudan experienced the largest epidemic of CHIKV in Africa to date, affecting an estimated 487,600 people. Known locally as Kankasha, this study examines clinical characteristics, risk factors, and phylogenetics of the epidemic in Kassala City. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33930028 PMCID: PMC8115788 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009387
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Fig 1Study location: Kassala state, located in Eastern Sudan, 600 km the capital city, Khartoum.
covers an area of 42,282 km2 and has a population 1.8 million inhabitants. Kassala City is the State capital with a population of ~ 400,000. Kassala Teaching Hospital is the State tertiary hospital and provides service for all patients referred from health centres and rural hospitals. The source of the map is: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=16093732.
Fig 2Flow diagram of study participants and virological findings: CHIKV: Chikungunya; DENV: Dengue Virus.
ELISA IgM testing was limited by kit availability: CHIKV RT-PCR-negative samples were prioritised, followed 69 CHIKV RT-PCR positive samples in order of recruitment.
Participant characteristics by Chikungunya (CHIKV) RT-PCR result.
| total | CHIKV positive (n = 120) | CHIKV negative (n = 22) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | |||||
| Female | 47.9% | 56 | 12 | ||
| Male | 52.1% | 64 | 10 | ||
| Age (y), median [IQR] | 22 | 37 | |||
| Age Group (y) (n = 141) | |||||
| <2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | ||
| 2–4 | 6 | 5 | 1 | ||
| 5–14 | 24 | 22 | 2 | ||
| 15–29 | 51 | 46 | 5 | ||
| 30–49 | 33 | 26 | 7 | ||
| 50+ | 20 | 13 | 7 | ||
| Occupation (n = 141) | |||||
| < 5 child | 13 | 12 | 1 | ||
| Schoolchild/student | 49 | 43 | 6 | ||
| Housewife | 31 | 26 | 5 | ||
| Farmer/Outdoor worker | 15 | 12 | 3 | ||
| Professional/Business | 7 | 7 | 0 | ||
| Health worker | 5 | 3 | 2 | ||
| Retired/unemployed | 21 | 17 | 4 | ||
| Median household size (IQR) n = 102 | 8 | 8 | 7 |
Notes: Missing data: age 1, occupation 1, # in household 40. IQR: Interquartile Range
Most participants who provided residence location (69%, 80/116) came from Kassala City sectors 2, 3, 4 and 5 on the banks of the seasonal River Gash, coinciding with areas of greatest flooding in the 2018 rainy season, and with highest case reports during the epidemic. A further 26% (30/116) were from rural areas up to 1.5 hours’ drive away.
Clinical symptoms and cycle threshold (Ct) values of participants at presentation by CHIKV RT-PCR result (n = 142).
| CHIKV positive | CHIKV negative | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2 | |||
| Fever/history of fever | 117 | 22 | ||
| Any bleeding | 6 | 1 | ||
| Headache | 97 | 17 | ||
| Joint pain | 93 | 15 | ||
| Fatigue | 85 | 17 | ||
| Muscle pain | 66 | 16 | ||
| Back pain | 55 | 9 | ||
| Loss of appetite | 46 | 6 | ||
| Vomiting | 45 | 8 | ||
| Abdominal pain | 32 | 8 | ||
| Lack of strength | 25 | 4 | ||
| Dizziness | 18 | 3 | ||
| Chest pain | 17 | 3 | ||
| Cough | 17 | 2 | ||
| Rash | 13 | 2 | ||
| Diarrhoea | 11 | 2 | ||
| Dysphagia | 9 | 3 | ||
| Dehydration | 9 | 1 | ||
| Shortness of breath | 7 | 2 | ||
| Conjunctivitis | 7 | 3 | ||
| Sore throat | 6 | 0 | ||
| Confusion | 3 | 0 | ||
| High (Ct <20) | 33 | - | ||
| Moderate (Ct 20–29) | 24 | - | ||
| Low (Ct 30–38) | 63 | - | ||
| Malaria RDT positive | 34/118 | 5/22 | ||
| DENV positive (RT-PCR) | 9/120 | 3/22 |
Notes: RDT Rapid Diagnostic Test. Missing data: fever 3; onset date 3; malaria RDT 2.
Mean clinical parameters of participants at presentation by CHIKV RT-PCR result.
| CHIKV positive | SD | CHIKV negative | SD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heart rate (beats/min) | 19.2 | 15.8 | ||||
| Respiratory rate | 2.9 | n/a | ||||
| Systolic pressure | 20.2 | 12.5 | ||||
| Diastolic pressure | 13.1 | 7.5 | ||||
| Haemoglobin (g/dL) | 2.2 | 2.5 | ||||
| Haematocrit (%) | 6.3 | 7.4 | ||||
| WBC (103/uL) | 3.1 | 2.2 | ||||
| Lymphocytes (103/uL) | 2.4 | 6.6 | ||||
| Platelets (109/L) | 143.3 | 131.0 | ||||
| Nitrogen oxide | 2.0 | 1.7 | ||||
| Urea (mg/dL) | 14.9 | 11.3 | ||||
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.7 | 0.2 | ||||
| Bilirubin | 1.5 | 1.3 | ||||
| AST (IU/L) | 33.9 | 17.4 | ||||
| ALT (IU/L) | 23.4 | 14.4 | ||||
| Albumin | 6.8 | 6.4 |
Notes: WBC White Blood Cells; AST Aspartate aminotransferase; ALT Alanine aminotransferase.
*Significant difference p = 0.049
Impact of CHIKV infection on work and disability 70–120 days after acute infection.
| Adults (n = 101) | Children (n = 40) | p (Fisher) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | 30 | ||||
| 75 | - | ||||
| Discharged the same day | 26 | 18 | p = 0.039 | ||
| Admitted for at least 1 day | 4 | 12 | |||
| Median days admitted | 2 | 3 | |||
| < 1 week | 11 | ||||
| 1–2 weeks | 13 | ||||
| 3–4 weeks | 4 | ||||
| >4 weeks | 2 | ||||
| Near remission | 8 | ||||
| Low disability | 17 | ||||
| Moderate disability | 3 | ||||
| 19 | |||||
| Knee | 14 | ||||
| Ankle | 11 | ||||
| Wrist | 9 | ||||
| Shoulder | 8 | ||||
| Fingers | 7 | ||||
| 4 | |||||
| 7 |
Notes: Pain perception and wellbeing are scored on a 0–10 scale with 10 being the worst pain and feeling the worst. IQR: Inter Quartile Range
Fig 3Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the ECSA genotype and its two distinct lineages showing the location of the Kassala 2018/19 strain: Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the East/Central/South African (ECSA) genotype and its two distinct lineages: the Indian Ocean Lineage (IOL) and the Middle African/ South American (MASA) lineage.
The monophyletic Kassala epidemic clade groups with sequences that originate from the Middle East and India and represents a distinct lineage from other African CHIKV variants. Node support values were evaluated using 100 bootstrap replicates and are illustrated using colour at nodes (with white representing 0 and black representing 100). The 2016 Mandera outbreak also represents a possible introduction from the Indian subcontinent and appears to be an independent event from the Kassala epidemic. Neither the Mandera or Kassala outbreak contained the A226V albopictus adaptive variant.