IL-33 promotes innate lymphoid cell-dependent IFN-γ production required for innate immunity to Toxoplasma gondii.

IL-33 is an alarmin required for resistance to the parasite Toxoplasma gondii, but its role in innate resistance to this organism is unclear. Infection with T. gondii promotes increased stromal cell expression of IL-33, and levels of parasite replication correlate with release of IL-33 in affected tissues. In response to infection, a subset of innate lymphoid cells (ILC) emerges composed of IL-33R+ NK cells and ILC1s. In Rag1-/-mice, where NK cells and ILC1 production of IFN-γ mediate innate resistance to T. gondii, the loss of the IL-33R resulted in reduced ILC responses and increased parasite replication. Furthermore, administration of IL-33 to Rag1-/- mice resulted in a marked decrease in parasite burden, increased production of IFN-γ, and the recruitment and expansion of inflammatory monocytes associated with parasite control. These protective effects of exogenous IL-33 were dependent on endogenous IL-12p40 and the ability of IL-33 to enhance ILC production of IFN-γ. These results highlight that IL-33 synergizes with IL-12 to promote ILC-mediated resistance to T. gondii.

Introduction

Toxoplasma gondii is an intracellular parasite of public health significance (Montoya and Liesenfeld, 2004; Weiss and Dubey, 2009; Israelski and Remington, 1988). Resistance to this organism is initiated by dendritic cell production of IL-12, which promotes natural killer (NK) and T cell secretion of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) (Khan et al., 1994; Hunter et al., 1994; Yap and Sher, 1999a). IFN-γ in turn induces multiple anti-microbial mechanisms, which include the activation of macrophages to express inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), which are required to limit parasite replication (Yap and Sher, 1999b; Dunay et al., 2010; Serbina et al., 2003; Scharton-Kersten et al., 1997; Wang et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2020). Previous studies have shown that mice deficient in the adapter molecule MyD88 have increased susceptibility to T. gondii associated with reduced production of IL-12 and IFN-γ (Scanga et al., 2002; Del Rio et al., 2004). Since MyD88 is a major adapter required for Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling, this increased susceptibility is consistent with a role for TLR-mediated recognition of this pathogen. However, TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, TLR6, TLR9, and TLR11 are individually not required for early resistance to T. gondii (Yarovinsky et al., 2005; Plattner et al., 2008; Hitziger et al., 2005; Furuta et al., 2006), and there is a MyD88-independent mechanism of parasite recognition (Kim et al., 2006; Sukhumavasi et al., 2008; Mercer et al., 2020). Moreover, administration of IL-12 to Myd88 mice does not restore the ability to produce IFN-γ, and NK and T cell expression of MyD88 is required for optimal production of IFN-γ and resistance to T. gondii (LaRosa et al., 2008; Ge et al., 2014). Thus, MyD88 has a critical role in resistance to T. gondii, but the events that engage this adapter molecule are unclear.

Members of the IL-1 family of cytokines, including IL-1α/β, IL-18, and IL-33, utilize distinct receptor sub-units but share downstream signaling machinery that includes MyD88. These cytokines impact a wide range of immune cells and influence many facets of the innate immune system (Dinarello, 2018). Mice that lack T and B cells have helped define the impact of cytokines on innate mechanisms of immunity to a wide variety of pathogens (Powell et al., 2012; Monticelli et al., 2011; Klose and Artis, 2016; Abt et al., 2015). For example, these models were important to identify the role of IL-12 in promoting NK cell production of IFN-γ required for innate resistance to Listeria monocytogenes and T. gondii (Bancroft et al., 1991; Tripp et al., 1993; Hunter et al., 1993). It is now appreciated that NK cells and ILC1 populations are both relevant sources of IFN-γ that contribute to the control of T. gondii (Park et al., 2019; Weizman et al., 2017; López-Yglesias et al., 2020). Although IL-1 and IL-18 synergize with IL-12 to promote NK cell production of IFN-γ (Hunter et al., 1995a; Cai et al., 2000; Kearley et al., 2015), the role of endogenous IL-1 during toxoplasmosis is secondary to those of IL-12 (Hitziger et al., 2005; Hunter et al., 1995a; Melchor et al., 2020), and endogenous IL-18 is not required for parasite control but rather contributes to the immune pathology that can accompany this infection (Cai et al., 2000; Yap et al., 2001; Vossenkämper et al., 2004; Ewald et al., 2014; Gorfu et al., 2014). In contrast, endogenous IL-33 has an essential role in resistance to T. gondii, but the basis for this protective effect is not well understood (Jones et al., 2010).

IL-33 is a cytokine that is constitutively expressed by endothelial and epithelial cells, and in current models, the death of these cells leads to the release of IL-33 that acts as a damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) or alarmin to activate immune cell populations (Schmitz et al., 2005; Moussion et al., 2008; Liew et al., 2016; Rostan et al., 2015). While there are open questions about whether this cytokine can also be secreted (Kouzaki et al., 2011; Kakkar et al., 2012), the rapid oxidation of IL-33 inactivates this cytokine and ensures that its activity is restricted to local sites of tissue damage (Cohen et al., 2015). IL-33 and the IL-33R (also termed ST2, encoded by Il1rl1) are most prominently associated with amplification of TH2 CD4+ T cells, activation of ILC2, and resistance to helminths (Schmitz et al., 2005; Humphreys et al., 2008; Silver et al., 2016; Osbourn et al., 2017; Ricardo-Gonzalez et al., 2018; Molofsky et al., 2015), immune regulation by Treg cells (Matta et al., 2014; Schiering et al., 2014), and a number of metabolic and para-immune functions mediated by ILC2 and regulatory T cells (Spallanzani et al., 2019; Ito et al., 2019). Consistent with its ability to promote TH2-type responses, IL-33 can antagonize inflammation mediated by TH1/TH17 cells during experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE) (Franca et al., 2016; Milovanovic et al., 2012; Xiao et al., 2018) and suppresses pathological TH1 responses during visceral leishmaniasis (Rostan et al., 2013). However, during infection with LCMV or MCMV, IL-33 promotes the expansion of NK cells and T cells and their production of IFN-γ, and loss of the IL-33R results in a delay in viral clearance (Nabekura et al., 2015; Bonilla et al., 2012; Baumann et al., 2015). In contrast, perhaps one of the most strking phenotypes of mice that lack IL-33R is that they succumb to chronic toxoplasmosis, associated with reduced astrocyte responses required for protective T cell responses (Jones et al., 2010; Still et al., 2020). Nevertheless, the acute stage of toxoplasmosis is associated with the ability of T. gondii to infect and lyse epithelial and endothelial cells (Konradt et al., 2016; Van Grol et al., 2013; Delgado Betancourt et al., 2019; Luu et al., 2019; Ju et al., 2009), but whether these events lead to the release of IL-33 or if this affects the innate response to Toxoplasma is unknown. The present study reveals that parasite replication during acute toxoplasmosis is associated with the release of IL-33, and Rag1 mice that lack the IL-33R have defects in ILC production of IFN-γ and impaired parasite control. Furthermore, administration of IL-33 to Rag1 mice enhanced ILC production of IFN-γ associated with the expansion of a population of Ly6chi CCR2+ inflammatory monocytes and a marked reduction in parasite burden. Together, these results highlight that infection-induced release of IL-33 synergizes with IL-12 to promote ILC production of IFN-γ required for resistance to T. gondii.

Results

Toxoplasma gondii infection induces IL-33 upregulation and release

To determine the impact of Toxoplasma infection on IL-33 expression and secretion, C57BL/6 WT and Rag1 mice were infected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with the Me49 strain or the replication-deficient CPS strain of T. gondii, and the levels of IL-33 at local sites of infection and affected tissues assessed by ELISA. In the peritoneum of naïve WT and Rag1 mice, the level of IL-33 was below the limit of detection (<10 pg/ml) (Figure 1A). Infection i.p. with 2 × 105 tachyzoites of the non-replicating CPS strain did not cause parasite-induced host cell lysis and failed to elicit detectable IL-33 at 1 or 5 days post-infection (dpi) (data not shown). Intraperitoneal infection of WT mice with 20 cysts of Me49 resulted in <1% infected cells in the peritoneum at 5 dpi, and IL-33 was not detected by ELISA (Figure 1A). When Rag1 mice received the same challenge, there were 2–5% infected cells at 5 dpi, and elevated levels of IL-33 were present (Figure 1A). To test whether IL-33 levels were a function of parasite burden, WT and Rag1mice were treated with anti-IFN-γ, which resulted in a 20-fold increase in parasite load (data not shown) and a threefold to fourfold increase in the levels of IL-33 (Figure 1A). When these data sets were collated and quantity of parasite DNA plotted versus IL-33 concentration, there was a strong correlation between parasite burden and IL-33 levels (R = 0.7902) (Figure 1B). To determine whether IL-33 was released in other tissues affected by T. gondii, tissue biopsies from the liver of WT mice at 10 dpi were prepared and placed in culture for 24 hr and IL-33 release measured. While basal levels of IL-33 were detected in tissues from naïve WT mice and mice injected with replication-deficient CPS parasites, the biopsies from infected mice showed significantly elevated levels of IL-33 (Figure 1C). These results suggest that parasite replication and lysis of infected cells lead to IL-33 release, and these levels are comparable to those reported in other inflammatory settings (Kearley et al., 2015; Llop-Guevara et al., 2014).

Figure 1.

Toxoplasma gondii infection induces IL-33 expression and release.

Mice were infected i.p. with T. gondii. After 7 days, (A) free IL-33 in the peritoneal cavity was measured by ELISA. (B) Measurements of IL-33 from (A) were plotted against corresponding parasite burden and fit to a linear model. (C) Five millimeter punch biopsies of liver was placed in culture for 24 hr and IL-33 measured in supernatants by ELISA. Each point represents the mean of three biopsies from a single mouse. (D) Cells from omenta of IL-33 GFP reporter mice were analyzed by flow cytometry at 3 days post-infection. Cells shown are live singlets. Data are representative of three mice per group. (E) Whole mount omentum showing IL-33-GFP signal in milky spot. (F) 3D projection of milky spot showing stromal marker ERTR7 and IL-33 GFP signal. (G) Whole mount immunofluorescence of milky spot. NS, not significant (p>0.05); *p<0.05 and ***p<0.001 (one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). Data are pooled from three (A and B) or two (C, D, E, F, and G) independent experiments (mean + s.e.m).

Mice were infected i.p. with T. gondii. After 7 days, (A–C) Intracellular staining of omenta from infected mice. Data are representative of 3 mice per group, FMO controls are pooled from samples of all genotypes above. (D) Immunofluorescence of spleen sections from naïve mouse and intracellular staining flow cytometry from naïve and infected mouse lungs. Data are representative of 3 mice per condition and genotype (E) Surface staining of omenta from wild type naïve and infected mice. Data are representative of 3 mice per condition and genotype.

To identify the cellular source of IL-33 during infection, the IL-33-IRES-GFP mouse (Johnston et al., 2016), a faithful reporter for IL-33 protein production in comparison to direct staining and Il33/ mice (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A), was utilized. The IL-33 reporter mice were infected i.p. with a fluorescent strain of T. gondii (Pru-tdTom), and the expression of IL-33-GFP in the omentum was examined by flow cytometry and IHC at 3 dpi. The omentum is an adipose tissue that contains fat-associated lymphoid clusters (FALCs), which are one of the major sites for drainage from the peritoneum (Christian et al., 2020; Jackson-Jones et al., 2016; Buscher et al., 2016). In naïve mice, the omentum contained a small population of CD45+ immune cells, most of which were IL-33-GFP, whereas fibroblastic stromal cells (CD45FSChi SSChi CD31+/ PDPN+/) were the main source of IL-33-GFP+ cells (Figure 1D, Figure 1—figure supplement 1B). Upon infection, there was a marked (approximately 7- to 10-fold) expansion of the CD45+ population and a small population (0.5%) of the CD45+ F4/80+ MHCII+ cells expressed IL-33 (Figure 1D and data not shown). Nevertheless, although the percentage of stromal cells that expressed IL-33 was decreased (as a consequence of the increased inflammatory populations, compare cell density of plots in Figure 1D), the major population of IL-33-GFP+ cells remained fibroblastic stromal cells (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B). The ability to detect infected cells based on parasite expression of tdTomato revealed that infected cells were not associated with IL-33 expression (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C), suggesting that infection of individual cells does not directly drive IL-33 expression. Similarly, at 7 dpi, the use of flow cytometry and immunofluorescence revealed that CD45− cells were the dominant source of IL-33 in the spleen, lung, and liver (Figure 1—figure supplement 1D). By contrast, the majority of IL-33R staining in infected mice was observed on CD45+ cells, suggesting that hematopoietic cells are the primary responders to IL-33 release (Figure 1—figure supplement 1E). To understand the spatial organization of the IL-33-GFP+ cells, the omentum was used for whole tissue mount immunofluorescence. In uninfected mice, consistent with the analysis above, IL-33 was constitutively expressed by non-hematopoietic CD45− cells with fibroblastic morphology distributed throughout the FALCs. At 3 dpi, there was a marked increase in the size of the FALC, and an approximate 3-fold increase in number of IL-33+ cells (Figure 1E). These images are max projection views that illustrate the size of FALCs, but quantification of the intensity of fluorescence highlighted the 10-fold increase in the expression of IL-33-GFP (Figure 1E) associated with ERTR7+ fibroblastic reticular cells (Figure 1F). Imaging revealed that areas of parasite replication were inversely correlated with the presence of IL-33-GFP expression (Figure 1G). Together, these data establish that in mice acutely infected with T. gondii stromal cells are a major source of IL-33, that release of IL-33 correlates with levels of parasite replication, and that a sub-population of innate immune cells express the IL-33R.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

IL-33 is primarily expressed by non-hematopoietic cells.

Mice were infected i.p. with T. gondii. After 7 days, (A–C) Intracellular staining of omenta from infected mice. Data are representative of 3 mice per group, FMO controls are pooled from samples of all genotypes above. (D) Immunofluorescence of spleen sections from naïve mouse and intracellular staining flow cytometry from naïve and infected mouse lungs. Data are representative of 3 mice per condition and genotype (E) Surface staining of omenta from wild type naïve and infected mice. Data are representative of 3 mice per condition and genotype.

ILC responses to IL-33

To identify the cell populations that could respond to the local release of IL-33 during this infection, a UMAP analysis was used to provide an unbiased comparison of the changes in IL-33R expression in the peritoneum of naïve and infected Rag1−/− mice (Figure 2A). In naïve mice, IL-33R was expressed by peritoneal macrophages (CD64+CD11b+MHCII+/−) and a small population of ILC2 (Lin− Nkp46−) when compared with Il1rl1 controls (Figure 2A). By 5 dpi, there was a marked change in the cellular composition of the peritoneum with a loss of the MHCII– macrophage and ILC2 populations but a prominent monocyte and neutrophil infiltration and the expansion of NKp46+ NK cells and ILC1s (Figure 2A, bottom). While there were low levels of IL-33R expressed by MHCIIhi CD64+ cells, the highest levels of IL-33R were observed on NKp46+ cells. Comparison of WT, Il1rl1, and Il33 mice revealed that IL-33R expression was not detected on peritoneal or splenic NK cells in naïve mice, but IL-33R was observed on a subset (~20%) of NK cells in the peritoneum by 5 dpi (Figure 2B). Furthermore, NK cells from infected Il33 mice still upregulated expression of the IL-33R, indicating that IL-33 signaling is not required for this process. Thus, acute infection of immune competent mice with T. gondii is characterized by the emergence of populations of NK cells and ILC1s that express the IL-33R.

Figure 2.

Infection sensitizes NK and ILC to IL-33.

(A) UMAP analysis of peritoneal exudate cells from naïve or 7 dpi i.p. mice, with heatmap for IL-33R expression. Data compiled from four mice per group. (B) Flow cytometry from peritoneal cells showing IL-33R staining on NKp46+ cells. Data are representative of three to four mice per group. (C) Flow cytometry of LAKs showing composition of population based on cytokine stimulation condition. Population shown is pre-gated on live singlets. (D) Intracellular cytokine staining of LAKs after 24 hr cytokine stimulation and 4 hr incubation with Brefeldin A. NS, not significant (p>0.05) (Student’s t-test); data are representative of three independent experiments (A–D).

To understand the impact of IL-33 on ILC populations, IL-2 induced lymphokine-activated killer cells (LAKs) generated from the bone marrow of Rag1 mice (Hunter et al., 1997; Wherry et al., 1991) were utilized to compare the impact of IL-33 (and its relative IL-18) alone or in combination with IL-12 on ILCs. Phenotyping of these LAK cultures revealed that they contained ILC1s (NKp46+ CD200R1+), ILC2s (NKp46- CD200R1+) and NK cells (NKp46+ CD200R1-) (Figure 2C). Upon withdrawal of IL-2, the addition of IL-33 preferentially stimulated the proliferation of CD200R1+ ILC2s, while IL-18 stimulated NK cell proliferation (Figure 2C). IL-12 alone did not induce the expansion of a specific cell type, but when combined with IL-33 maintained the heterogeneity of the LAK population, while IL-12 plus IL-18 resulted in a modest increase in the proportion of NK cells compared to IL-18 alone. Moreover, while IL-33 alone did not stimulate LAKs to produce IFN-γ it did synergize with IL-12 to enhance the production of IFN-γ in the NKp46+ populations (Figure 2D). Similar results were observed when splenocytes from Rag1 mice were used (Figure 2D, bottom right panel) indicating that these effects of IL-33 on NK cells were not dependent on pre-activation with IL-2. These observations are consistent with previous reports on the ability of IL-33 to promote ILC2 activity (Monticelli et al., 2011; Monticelli et al., 2015), but demonstrate that in the presence of IL-12, IL-33 is a potent inducer of IFN-γ.

Endogenous IL-33 is required for innate resistance to T. gondii

To directly test the role of endogenous IL-33 in innate resistance to T. gondii, Rag1 mice that lacked the IL-33R (Rag1; Il1rl1 mice) were generated and infected i.p. with T. gondii. Compared to Rag1 mice, at 7 dpi the Rag1; Il1rl1 mice showed an increased parasite burden based on the frequency of infected cells in the peritoneum (Figure 3A) and quantitation of parasite DNA in the peritoneum and liver (Figure 3B). Serum analysis of infected mice revealed comparable levels of IL-12p40 in Rag1 and Rag1; Il1rl1 mice, but IFN-γ was severely compromised in the Rag1; Il1rl1mice (Figure 3C). Similar results were observed in Rag1-sufficient WT and Il1rl1 mice (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A,B). At this time point, Rag1 mice had a marked expansion in ILC1s and NK cells in the liver that was reduced in the absence of the IL-33R (Figure 3D). Consistent with decreased production of IFN-γ, fewer Ly6chi monocytes were recruited to the liver in the Rag1; Il1rl1mice (Figure 3E). Analysis of the Ly6chi population in the liver at 7 dpi after infection with Pru-tdTom showed that a proportion of infected and uninfected cells express iNOS in the Rag1mice, but iNOS levels were markedly reduced in the Rag1; Il1rl1 mice (Figure 3F). Neutrophil numbers, by contrast, were elevated in Rag1; Il1rl1 mice (Figure 3—figure supplement 1C), although this was not sufficient for parasite control. These data sets establish that endogenous IL-33 is required for optimal production of innate IFN-γ and the recruitment of monocyte populations that express anti-microbial effector mechanisms required for resistance to T. gondii.

Figure 3.

Endogenous IL-33 promotes the anti-parasitic immune response.

(A) Cytospins of peritoneal exudate cells at 7 dpi i.p. (B) qPCR for parasite DNA from indicated tissues. (C) Serum cytokines measured by ELISA at 7 dpi. Representative of four to five mice per group. (D) Flow cytometric analysis and quantification of liver innate lymphoid cells. Populations shown are pre-gated on live singlets that are MHCII−. (E) Quantification of inflammatory monocytes (CD11b+CD64+Ly6 g−) in livers of infected mice at 7 dpi. (F) Intracellular iNOS staining from monocytes in (E), sub-gated on primary iNOS-producing cells (Ly6chi MHCIIlo). NS, not significant (p>0.05); *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, and ****p<0.0001 (student’s t-test). Data are representative of three independent experiments.

Mice were infected i.p. with T. gondii. (A) Quantification of serum cytokines from Rag1+/+ mice at 10 dpi. (B) Weight loss curves for mice from (A). (C) Representative flow cytometric analysis (left) and quantification of numbers (right) of neutrophils in the peritoneum at 7 dpi. Data are representative of three independent experiments.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

Endogenous IL-33 promotes anti-parasite responses in WT mice.

Mice were infected i.p. with T. gondii. (A) Quantification of serum cytokines from Rag1+/+ mice at 10 dpi. (B) Weight loss curves for mice from (A). (C) Representative flow cytometric analysis (left) and quantification of numbers (right) of neutrophils in the peritoneum at 7 dpi. Data are representative of three independent experiments.

IL-33 treatment boosts IL-12- and IFN-γ-dependent immunity

Based on the ability of IL-33 to stimulate IL-12-dependent IFN-γ production in ILC1s and NK cells, a recombinant version of IL-33, resistant to oxidation which has a 30-fold increase in efficacy (Kearley et al., 2015; Cohen et al., 2015), was utilized to determine if exogenous IL-33 could be used to enhance innate resistance to T. gondii. Beginning at 1 dpi, IL-33 was administered i.p. every 2 days until 7 dpi, which resulted in a dose-dependent reduction in the frequency of infected cells at the site of infection and a decrease in parasite DNA in multiple tissues (Figure 4A). Analysis of cytospins of PECs revealed that treatment of infected Rag1 mice with IL-33 resulted in the emergence of a highly activated monocyte population (Figure 4B). By contrast, neutrophil numbers were not affected by IL-33 treatment (data not shown). These inflammatory monocytes were larger (higher FSC) and more granular (higher SSC) (Figure 4C). Furthermore, these cells were characterized by their expression of CD11b, CD11c, Ly6c, CCR2, and MHCII (Figure 4C). IL-33 treatment also resulted in increased recruitment of Ly6chi CCR2+ inflammatory monocytes to the liver and lungs by 7 dpi, and these monocytes had enhanced iNOS and IL-33R expression (Figure 4D). Histological analysis of the liver confirmed that IL-33 treatment resulted in increased cellular infiltration and expression of iNOS (Figure 4E, black arrows). Importantly, these changes induced by IL-33 treatment were associated with decreased necrotic foci that were frequent in infected Rag1mice (Figure 4E, blue arrow). These results correlate the protective effects of IL-33 treatment with an increase in macrophage and monocyte responses required for the control of T. gondii.

Figure 4.

IL-33 treatment boosts IL-12- and IFN-γ-dependent immunity.

(A) Quantification of infected cell frequencies in cytospins at 7 dpi i.p. and qPCR for parasite DNA in indicated tissues. (B) Representative cytospins from peritoneal lavage at 7 dpi. Data are representative of four to six mice per group. (C) Flow cytometric analysis of inflammatory monocytes in the peritoneal exudate at 7 dpi. Populations shown are pre-gated on live Ly6g− singlets. Ly6chi CCR2+ cells are highlighted in black. (D) Representative analysis of Ly6c+ CCR2+ cells at 7 dpi in the liver and quantification of monocyte numbers and iNOS staining. (E) Histology of liver at 7 dpi, H and E showing infiltration of immune cells (left) and DAB iNOS staining (right). Black arrows indicate inflammatory infiltration; blue arrow indicates necrotic lesion. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.001 (Student’s t-test). Data are representative of five (A–C) or three (D–E) independent experiments.

To determine whether the protective effects of exogenous IL-33 depended on the ability of IL-12 to promote ILC production of IFN-γ, infected Rag1 mice were treated with IL-33 in combination with either anti-IL-12p40 or anti-IFN-γ neutralizing antibodies. Additionally, Rag2; Il2rg mice, which lack ILCs, were treated with PBS or IL-33. Blockade of either IL-12 or IFN-γ entirely abrogated the protective effects of IL-33 treatment as measured by the frequency of infected cells in the peritoneum at 7 dpi (Figure 5A). As expected, Rag2; Il2rg mice were more susceptible than Rag1 mice, and IL-33 treatment did not affect parasite burden in the peritoneum. IFN-γ levels at the site of infection were increased by IL-33 treatment in ILC-sufficient Rag1 animals, but were unaffected in Rag2; Il2rg animals (Figure 5B). In Rag1 mice, treatment with IL-33 resulted in an expansion of the NK and ILC1 compartments and their production of IFN-γ (Figure 5C). The expansion of Ly6chi CCR2+ monocytes associated with protection was also dependent on these factors, as cytokine blockade or absence of innate lymphoid cells resulted in the loss of these cells (Figure 5D and Figure 5E). These results suggest that the protective effects of IL-33 are not working through effects on the monocytes but rather that the ability of exogenous IL-33 to promote parasite control are dependent on IL-12 and ILC production of IFN-γ and subsequent activation of inflammatory monocytes.

Figure 5.

Protective effect of IL-33 is dependent on IL-12, IFN-γ, and ILC.

(A) Quantification of cytospins from peritoneal exudate cells at 7 dpi i.p. (B) Quantification of IFN-γ in peritoneal lavage at 7 dpi. (C) Representative flow cytometric analysis of NK cells and ILC1s (left) and quantification of cell numbers and cytokine production (right) in the peritoneal exudate at 7 dpi. Population shown is pre-gated on live Ly6g- NKp46+ singlets. (D and E) Flow cytometric analysis of inflammatory monocytes in peritoneum at 7 dpi. Data are representative of two independent experiments.

Discussion

Previous studies have identified a central role for IL-12 in innate and adaptive production of IFN-γ required for control of T. gondii (Khan et al., 1994; Hunter et al., 1994; Gazzinelli et al., 1993; Hunter et al., 1995b; Yap et al., 2000; Wilson et al., 2008), but other cytokines and costimulatory pathways potentiate the effects of IL-12 on NK cells. In particular, IL-1 and IL-18 can amplify NK cell production of IFN-γ, but evidence that endogenous IL-1 and IL-18 are critical for control of T. gondii in this model is limited. Thus, while IL-1 or IL-18 contribute to the development of infection-induced, microbiome-dependent immune mediated pathology in the gut, there is limited evidence that loss of IL-1 or IL-18 leads to increased parasite replication (Hitziger et al., 2005; LaRosa et al., 2008; Melchor et al., 2020; Vossenkämper et al., 2004; Mordue et al., 2001; Struck et al., 2012; Muñoz et al., 2015; Villeret et al., 2013). Indeed, early studies showed that neutralization of endogenous IL-18 did not affect levels of parasite replication and that in SCID mice treated with IL-12 the effects of IL-1R blockade were modest and these treated mice were still more resistant than untreated SCID mice (Hunter et al., 1995a). It is relevant to note that recent work has highlighted a cell intrinsic role for MyD88 in NK cells to help control T. gondii (Ge et al., 2014), but neither IL-1 blockade or the use of IL-1R and IL-18 mice replicates the susceptibility of Myd88mice (LaRosa et al., 2008; Hitziger et al., 2005). In the studies presented here, the reduced NK and ILC responses observed in Rag1; Il1rl1 mice suggest that the ability of IL-33 (rather than IL-1 or IL-18) to amplify the IL-12-mediated innate response to acute toxoplasmosis helps explain the role for MyD88 in innate resistance to T. gondii. It is increasingly appreciated that in addition to NK cells, tissue resident ILC1s are an early source of IFN-γ in the innate response to T. gondii (Park et al., 2019; Weizman et al., 2017), but the differential programming of these cells, including their responsiveness to the IL-1 family member cytokines, is still being described. While IL-12 is central to NK and ILC1 production of IFN-γ, there are other stimuli that can potentiate this pathway (Walker et al., 1999). Certainly in vitro, in the presence of IL-12, IL-33 can promote NK cells and ILC1 IFN-γ production. While IL-18 is a more potent stimulator of IFN-γ in LAK cultures, the ability of IL-33 to promote NK and ILC1 responses, combined with the defects seen in these populations in Il1rl1-/- mice, suggests that of all the IL-1 family members, IL-33 is uniquely important for innate lymphoid cell responses to Toxoplasma.

Because the signaling pathways for the IL-1 family members converge on MyD88-dependent activation of NF-κB, differences in expression patterns and tissue localization are likely to dictate the relative importance of each cytokine. The release of IL-1 and IL-18 is typically considered to be downstream of inflammasome-mediated caspase activation and processing of pro-forms of these cytokines (Man and Kanneganti, 2015). While there is evidence that pro-IL-1 and pro-IL-18 are produced during toxoplasmosis (Hunter et al., 1993; Zediak and Hunter, 2003), several studies have concluded that T. gondii does not readily activate inflammasomes and there is evidence that Toxoplasma suppresses inflammasome activity (Ewald et al., 2014; Lima et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2019). However, there is a report that the inflammasome sensors NLRP1 and NLRP3 are required for protective immunity to T. gondii (Gorfu et al., 2014). A possible explanation for this discrepancy is that some inflammasome components are not just microbial sensors but have additional functions that include a role for Caspase eight in the activation of the c-Rel transcription factor required for expression of IL-12 and resistance to T. gondii (DeLaney et al., 2019). To date, no murine sensor of Toxoplasma or parasite ligand has been identified that directly activates inflammasomes, although there is evidence for sensor-independent routes for inflammasome activation (Sandstrom et al., 2019). In contrast to the complex events that lead to the production and processing of IL-1 and IL-18, IL-33 is expressed constitutively by epithelial and endothelial cells at barrier sites and stored in the nucleus, and may therefore be resistant to parasite mechanisms of immune evasion and suppression that target host cell transcription. The release of IL-33 can occur as a consequence of tissue damage associated with allergic inflammation or viral infection (Bonilla et al., 2012; Silver et al., 2016), and during toxoplasmosis, IL-33 levels correlated closely with levels of parasite replication and host cell lysis. Thus, even though there may be non-canonical pathways for IL-33 release (Kouzaki et al., 2011; Kakkar et al., 2012; Spallanzani et al., 2019; Snelgrove et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2015), it seems likely that these physiological levels of IL-33 are a consequence of parasite-mediated lysis of infected cells.

Treatment of infected mice with exogenous IL-33 confirmed the protective effects of IL-33 and highlighted the impact on the recruitment of inflammatory monocytes to sites of infection and the subsequent upregulation of iNOS, a process required for the control of T. gondii (Yap and Sher, 1999b; Dunay et al., 2010; Serbina et al., 2003; Scharton-Kersten et al., 1997). IL-33 drives ILC-cell-dependent recruitment of CCR2+ inflammatory monocytes, which resemble the TipDCs (TNF and iNOS-producing dendritic cells) previously shown to be important for control of infection (Schiering et al., 2014; Spallanzani et al., 2019). This finding is similar to an allergy model in which IL-33 contributes to the CCR2-dependent recruitment of inflammatory monocytes (Tashiro et al., 2016). It has been reported that IL-33 can directly enhance monocyte production of iNOS (Li et al., 2014), but in the studies reported here, the ability of exogenous IL-33 to promote this population of IL-33R+ monocytes was dependent on ILC and the production of IFN-γ suggests that IL-33 is not sufficient to expand these monocytes. Additional experiments will be required to directly assess the contribution of the IL-33R to the regulation of monocyte function. It is also important to note that endogenous IL-33 is susceptible to rapid inactivation via oxidation in the extracellular space, which restricts its effects spatially and temporally. However, the recombinant IL-33 used in these studies was engineered to resist oxidation and it is possible that this treatment approach may have wider activities on hematopoiesis than IL-33 produced at sites of inflammation.

While IL-33 is most prominently linked to the regulation of Th2 type responses, there are reports that highlight the context dependent role that IL-33 plays in TH1 responses. In models of Leishmaniasis and cerebral malaria, IL-33 contributes to T-cell-dependent immune pathology in the skin and brain, respectively (Rostan et al., 2013; Reverchon et al., 2017). However, with the viral pathogens MCMV and LCMV, IL-33 contributes to NK and T cell expansion, and in its absence, there is a delay in viral clearance, but in neither case, is IL-33 essential for protective immunity (Kearley et al., 2015; Nabekura et al., 2015). Indeed, during intracerebral LCMV infection IL-33 contributes to the development of lethal immune pathology (Bonilla et al., 2012), whereas for mice chronically infected with T. gondii, the loss of IL-33 results in increased parasite burden (Jones et al., 2010). More recent studies have highlighted that IL-33 promotes astrocyte responses required for control of T. gondii in the CNS (Still et al., 2020). Nevertheless, the data presented here establish that the ability of IL-33 to amplify ILC responses and their production of IFN-γ plays a protective role in the acute innate response to Toxoplasma (see Figure 6). These results are consistent with a model in which IL-33 has a protective rather than pathological role in the immune response to T. gondii.

Figure 6.

Model for the role of IL-33 in innate immunity to Toxoplasma gondii.

Materials and methods

Mice

B6 (C57BL/6NTac) (Taconic #B6-F), Rag1 (B6.129S7-Rag1tm1Mom/J) (Jackson #002216), and Rag2; Il2rg(C57BL/6NTac.Rag2tm1Fwa;II2rgtm1Wjl) (Taconic #4111) mice were purchased from their respective vendors. Il33 (Il33tm1.1Arte) (Jackson #350163) mice were provided by MedImmune (now AstraZeneca). Il33fl/fl-eGFP (B6(129S4)-Il33tm1.1Bryc/J), originally generated by Paul Bryce, were obtained locally from Dr. De’Broski Herbert. IL-33R KO (Il1rl1) mice, originally derived by Andrew McKenzie (Townsend et al., 2000) (University of Cambridge) and back-crossed to C57BL/6 by Peter Nigrovic (Harvard University), were provided by Edward Behrens at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Rag1; Il1rl1 mice were generated by crossing the knockouts described above. Analysis of these uninfected KO mice revealed no obvious developmental defects, while their immune compartments appeared comparable to Rag1; Il1rl1+/+ mice in cell numbers and phenotype at homeostasis. Mice were housed in a specific pathogen-free environment at the University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine and treated according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University. Male and female (age 8–12 weeks at start of experiment) mice were used for all experiments.

Parasites and infection

The ME49 strain of T. gondii was maintained by serial passage in Swiss Webster mice and used to generate banks of chronically infected CBA/ca mice, which were a source of tissue cysts for these experiments. Pru-derived transgenic parasites and CPS parasites were maintained in cultured human fibroblasts in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. For CPS parasites, supplemental uracil was also added to media. For all experiments presented here, mice were infected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 20 cysts (ME49), or 1 × 104 tachyzoites (Pru), or 2 × 105 tachyzoites (CPS). Soluble toxoplasma antigen was prepared from tachyzoites of the RH strain as described previously (Hauser et al., 1983). For quantitative PCR (qPCR), DNA was isolated from tissues using the DNEasy DNA isolation kit (Qiagen) followed by qPCR measuring the abundance of the T. gondii gene B1 using the primers 5′-TCTTTAAAGCGTTCGTGGTC-3′ (forward) and 5′-GGAACTGCATCCGTTCATGAG-3′ (reverse).

Histology

For IHC detection of T. gondii and iNOS, tissues were fixed in 10% formalin solution and then paraffin embedded and sectioned. Sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, Ag retrieved in 0.01 M sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0), and endogenous peroxidase blocked by 0.3% H2O2 in PBS. After blocking with 2% normal goat serum, the sections were incubated either with rabbit anti-Toxoplasma Ab, anti-INOS Ab, or isotype control. The sections were then incubated with biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Vector, Burlingame, CA), and ABC reagent was applied (Vectastain ABC Kit; Vector Labs). Then DAB substrate (Vector Labs) was used to visualize specific staining according to manufacturer’s instructions, and slides were counterstained with hematoxylin. To quantify parasite burden in the peritoneal exudate, 100,000 cells were used to prepare cytospins. Cells were methanol fixed and then stained with the Protocol Hema-3 Stain Set, and the ratio of infected cells to total cells in a field of view was calculated, with a minimum of 200 cells counted per sample. For whole tissue mount immunofluorescence staining, omenta were harvested from mice and fixed in 1% PFA overnight at 4°C. After rinsing, tissue was blocked using 10% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 0.5% normal rat serum (Invitrogen), and 1 µg/ml 2.4G2 (BD) in PBS for 1 hr at room temperature. Omenta were next incubated in PBS containing primary antibodies at 4°C for 3 days and subsequently rinsed with PBS overnight. Antibodies used for this analysis: ERTR7 (sc-73355, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), F4/80 (T45-2342, BD), and CD45 (30-F11, Biolegend).

Immunofluorescence combining IL-33 (R and D AF3626) and CD45 (Biolegend 30-F11) antibodies was performed using the OPAL Automation Multiplex IHC Detection Kit (Akoya Biosciences, Cat # 160 #NEL830001KT) implemented onto a BOND Research Detection System (DS9455). All widefield images were obtained on a Leica DM6000 microscope using the Leica Imaging Suite software. Confocal images were acquired on a Leica STED 3× Super-resolution microscope. Image analysis was performed using FIJI and Imaris software packages.

Generation of lymphokine-activated killer cells

Lymphokine-activated killer cells (LAKs) were generated from Rag1bone marrow as described previously (Hunter et al., 1997; Wherry et al., 1991). Briefly, whole bone marrow was plated at 1 M cells/ml in cRPMI +400 U/ml Proleukin human IL-2 (Peprotech). Fresh IL-2 was added every third day, and cells were used for experiments between days 7 and 10.

Antibody and cytokine reagents

For in vitro assays, recombinant IL-33 was purchased from Peprotech (Cat # 210–33 Rocky Hill, NJ). For in vivo treatment experiments, recombinant IL-33 (MedImmune), which was modified to be resistant to oxidation, was used, as described previously (Cohen et al., 2015). IL-33 DuoSet ELISA was purchased from R and D Biosystems (Cat # DY3626, Minneapolis, MN). For flow cytometry, the following combinations of antibodies were used: for analysis of NK cells: CD335 NKp46 (29A1.4, eBioscience), NK-1.1 (PK136, Biolegend), IFN-γ (XMG1.2, eBioscience), CD200R1 (OX110, eBioscience), IL-33R (DJ8, MD Biosciences), T-bet (4B10, Biolegend), and EOMES (Dan11mag, eBioscience). For analysis of myeloid cells: CD11b (M1/70, eBioscience), CD11c (N418, Biolegend), Ly6c (HK1.4, Biolegend), Ly6g (1A8, Biolegend), CCR2 CD192 (SA203G11, Biolegend), CD64 FcgRI (X54-5/7.1, Biolegend), MHC II I-A/I-E (m5/114.15.2, eBioscience), iNOS (CXNFT, eBioscience), IL-33R (DJ8, MD Biosciences). For analysis of stromal cells: gp38/PDPN (8.1.1, Biolegend), CD31 (390, Biolegend). Flow cytometry was performed on BD Fortessa and X-50 cytometers, and data analysis was performed using Flowjo nine and Flowjo 10 (Treestar), and Prism 7 and 8 (Graphpad). Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction (uMAP) analysis was performed using the uMAP plug-in (version: 1802.03426, 2018, 2017, Leland McInness) for Flowjo (Version 10.53). The Euclidean distance function was utilized with a nearest neighbor score of 15 and a minimum distance rating of 0.5.

Quantification and statistical analysis

All data are expressed as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). For comparisons between two groups, the Student’s t-test was applied. For data with more than two data sets, one-way ANOVA coupled with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was applied. Statistical details are indicated in figure legends.

Our editorial process produces two outputs: i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.

Acceptance summary:

Thank you for your comprehensive revisions. These changes greatly strengthen the work and provide insight to how IL-33 regulates ILC functions.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "IL-33 promotes innate lymphoid cell-dependent IFN-γ production required for innate immunity to Toxoplasma gondii" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 3 peer reviewers, one of whom is a member of our Board of Reviewing Editors, and the evaluation has been overseen by Carla Rothlin as the Senior Editor. The following individual involved in review of your submission has agreed to reveal their identity: Malcolm R Starkey (Reviewer #3).

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

Essential Revisions:

1. Delineate more clearly the roles of the different compartments and mechanistic interactions.

2. Significantly improve the technical reporting of how experiments were performed in the study. eg. not clear how infections were performed; not clear which data is referred to in the text; were controls used.

3. Clarify the models used especially the use of controls and IL-33 reporter mice.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

Figure 1. Although Rag-/- mice were examined in Figure 1A, which mice the data report for the remainder of the figure has not been made clear. It is assumed that it is wild-type mice. What is the situation in the Rag-/- mice.

Figures: It would be helpful for the authors to clarify exactly how many experiments are shown in each figure. While they say "Data are representative of" it is often unclear whether they are actually showing pooled data, or one experiment representative of X similar independent experiments.

This work would be strengthened significantly by delineating more clearly the contributions of each compartment. This is a major confusion throughout the manuscript in trying to assess which cells are actually important in this response rather than a catalogue of cells that produce IL-33 or respond to IL-12. Thus, the causal relationships have not bee defined.

This work would benefit from a schematic to indicate how the authors believe the different cells are connected and which are the real drivers/where connections have been demonstrated in driving the immune response.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

1. The authors appear to "force for enhance" a role for IL-33 in this experimental model by injecting anti-IFN-γ antibody to the mice. Without such antibody treatment, there was undetectable level of IL-33 (Figure 1A and B) following infection of both WT and Rag deficient mice. This seriously questions the role of IL-33 in immunity. The authors should incorporate this critical concept in their discussion and emphasize that these role of ILL-33 is limited to situations where IFN-g response is suboptimal or defective.

2. It is not clear how the authors have performed infection. The only detail about the infection protocol is only explained for Figure 1A. Figure legends for other figures should include details of the infection procedure.

3. The naïve IL-33 GFP reporter mouse shows higher percentage of IL-33 compared to infected IL-33 GFP reporter mice (Figure 1C),, which is not in agreement with figures 1A and B. Given that naive mice are reporting IL-33 at about 19 times that of infected controls (albeit not coming CD5+ cells), one wonders whether this reporter mice is really ideal for assessing the role of IL-33 during infection.

4. The authors should check for the role of IL-33 in neutrophil migration and expansion during early T. gondii infection.

5. Is f there any change (increase) in ILC1 and NK cells numbers in RAG-/- mice treated with rIL-33.

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):

The manuscript by Clark et al., is well written, generally well presented and approached with scientific rigour in terms of experimental design and approach. Several comments may assist with the communication of the results to the target audience.

1. Abbreviations at first mention. Many abbreviations are used without explanation at first mention. This helps no experts follow the story. For example in introduction IL, NK, iNOS, IFN, TH2 etc. Please address all throughout where appropriate.

2. Some data panels are presented as bar graphs rather than individual points. Preference would be for all data to be presented as individual points so that the reader can get a rapid appreciation of the data, sample size etc.

3. Figure 1G. It appears in the image that the CD45+ staining has not worked optimally? Perhaps it is the image quality, but appears to be some non specific staining

4. For FACS plots, could pseudocolour plots be used? These are standard in field and easier to visualise

5. Terminology with gc-/-. In some parts is gc-/- in others IL2Rg-/-. Consistency would help here.

6. Were any studies with anti-IL-33 in infected wild-type mice performed? If not could this at least be discussed? Whilst knockout mouse models are valuable, the indirect impact of cell/factor deficiency throughout development should be considered. May disrupt immune cell development, microbiome etc.

Essential Revisions:

1. Delineate more clearly the roles of the different compartments and mechanistic interactions.

Our data support a paradigm in which in which infection with

2. Significantly improve the technical reporting of how experiments were performed in the study. eg. not clear how infections were performed; not clear which data is referred to in the text; were controls used.

All figures have been converted to individual data points, and all figure legends have been amended to clarify that all data shown are from single experiments and representative of a specified number of replicates. The text has been updated to clarify methods and details for each experiment, including that all infections were performed i.p. (e.g., lines 136, 197, 218, 276, 295, and all figure legends). Control data in the form of knockout mice has been added to experiments as appropriate, including the addition of analysis of different tissues from IL-33

3. Clarify the models used especially the use of controls and IL-33 reporter mice.

A discussion of the validation of the IL-33 reporter mouse has been added to the text (line 217) and knockout mouse controls for the IL-33 reporters has been adding to Figure 1 Supplement 1. In addition, details of the characterization of the Rag

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):Figure 1. Although Rag-/- mice were examined in Figure 1A, which mice the data report for the remainder of the figure has not been made clear. It is assumed that it is wild-type mice. What is the situation in the Rag-/- mice.

In Figure 1 we use a combination of immune competent IL-33 reporter mice and ELISA to look at infection-induced changes in IL-33 levels. The reviewer is correct that the reporters were only used for WT mice as we do not have the IL-33 reporter crossed to a Rag

Figures: It would be helpful for the authors to clarify exactly how many experiments are shown in each figure. While they say "Data are representative of" it is often unclear whether they are actually showing pooled data, or one experiment representative of X similar independent experiments.

All figures have been converted to show individual data points and figure legends amended to reflect this. All figures are data sets from individual experiments representative of multiple replicates.

This work would be strengthened significantly by delineating more clearly the contributions of each compartment. This is a major confusion throughout the manuscript in trying to assess which cells are actually important in this response rather than a catalogue of cells that produce IL-33 or respond to IL-12. Thus, the causal relationships have not been defined.

The data indicate that in vivo non-hematopoietic cells are the major source of IL-33 and that IL-12 is important for its ability to induce expression of IL-33R on ILC1 and NK cells. This point has been clarified in the Discussion section of the revised submission (line 262) and is now highlighted in the model shown in Figure 6.

This work would benefit from a schematic to indicate how the authors believe the different cells are connected and which are the real drivers/where connections have been demonstrated in driving the immune response.

A model has been included in the revised submission as Figure 6.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

1. The authors appear to "force for enhance" a role for IL-33 in this experimental model by injecting anti-IFN-γ antibody to the mice. Without such antibody treatment, there was undetectable level of IL-33 (Figure 1A and B) following infection of both WT and Rag deficient mice. This seriously questions the role of IL-33 in immunity. The authors should incorporate this critical concept in their discussion and emphasize that these role of ILL-33 is limited to situations where IFN-g response is suboptimal or defective.

Perhaps there has been a mis-understanding. Our data do not support the conclusion that the role of IL-33 is limited to situations where the IFN-g responses is sub-optimal or defective. It is important to note that there are elevated levels of IL-33 in Rag

2. It is not clear how the authors have performed infection. The only detail about the infection protocol is only explained for Figure 1A. Figure legends for other figures should include details of the infection procedure.

The revised text has been updated to indicate that all infections are intraperitoneal: line #s 136, 197, 218, 276, 295, and all figure legends.

3. The naïve IL-33 GFP reporter mouse shows higher percentage of IL-33 compared to infected IL-33 GFP reporter mice (Figure 1C),, which is not in agreement with figures 1A and B. Given that naive mice are reporting IL-33 at about 19 times that of infected controls (albeit not coming CD5+ cells), one wonders whether this reporter mice is really ideal for assessing the role of IL-33 during infection.

Firstly, we do validate the use of the IL-33 reporter in Figure 1 Supplement 1 and show the fidelity between reporter and protein expression. The reviewer appears concerned about the changes in the percentage of IL-33

4. The authors should check for the role of IL-33 in neutrophil migration and expansion during early T. gondii infection.

We appreciate this suggestion. The revised manuscript includes Figure 3 Supplement 1C showing that IL-33R deficiency was associated with a 2-fold increase in the number of neutrophils in the peritoneum relative to WT mice. We now note that enhanced neutrophil responses are typically associated with increased levels of parasite replication. IL-33 treatment was not associated with any change in neutrophil numbers (data not shown). Discussion of these data is integrated into the Results section (lines 290-291, 303-304).

5. Is f there any change (increase) in ILC1 and NK cells numbers in RAG-/- mice treated with rIL-33.

Thank you for this suggestion. There was an increase in ILC1 and NK cell numbers in IL-33-treated Rag

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):

The manuscript by Clark et al., is well written, generally well presented and approached with scientific rigour in terms of experimental design and approach. Several comments may assist with the communication of the results to the target audience.

1. Abbreviations at first mention. Many abbreviations are used without explanation at first mention. This helps no experts follow the story. For example in introduction IL, NK, iNOS, IFN, TH2 etc. Please address all throughout where appropriate.

An abbreviation key has been added to the revised manuscript and key abbreviations defined on first mention.

2. Some data panels are presented as bar graphs rather than individual points. Preference would be for all data to be presented as individual points so that the reader can get a rapid appreciation of the data, sample size etc.

Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 have been converted to individual data points.

3. Figure 1G. It appears in the image that the CD45+ staining has not worked optimally? Perhaps it is the image quality, but appears to be some non specific staining

Thank you for the suggestion. CD45 display was indeed sub-optimal, it was adjusted to display dimly due to the abundance of CD45+ cells, so as to not overwhelm the merged image. The brightness of CD45 has been increased slightly in the revised Figure 1G.4. For FACS plots, could pseudocolour plots be used? These are standard in field and easier to visualise

We appreciate this suggestion and typically use a combination of plots and only use pseudocolor when there is a specific benefit, eg see Figure 1D. For the majority of our plots we prefer contour plots including outliers in part because they do not require color.

5. Terminology with gc-/-. In some parts is gc-/- in others IL2Rg-/-. Consistency would help here.

This inconsistency has been fixed.

6. Were any studies with anti-IL-33 in infected wild-type mice performed? If not could this at least be discussed? Whilst knockout mouse models are valuable, the indirect impact of cell/factor deficiency throughout development should be considered. May disrupt immune cell development, microbiome etc.

Firstly, no gross defects in Rag

Key resources table

Reagent type (species) or resource	Designation	Source or reference	Identifiers	Additional information
Gene (Mus musculus)	Il33	GenBank	MGI:1924375	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/77215
Gene (Mus musculus)	Il1rl1	GenBank	MGI:98427	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/17082
Strain, strain background (Mus musculus)	C57BL/6NTac	Taconic	RRID:MGI:5658006
Genetic reagent (Mus musculus)	B6.129S7-Rag1tm1Mom/J	Jackson	RRID:IMSR_JAX:002216
Genetic reagent (Mus musculus)	C57BL/6NTac.Rag2tm1Fwa;II2rgtm1Wjl	Taconic	Cat # 4111
Genetic reagent (Mus musculus)	B6(129S4)-Il33tm1.1Bryc/J	Jackson	RRID:IMSR_JAX:030619
Genetic reagent (Mus musculus)	Il1rl1tm1Anjm	PMID:10727469 Townsend et al., 2000	MGI:2386675	http://www.informatics.jax.org/allele/MGI:2386675
Strain, strain background (Toxoplasma gondii)	ME49	NCBI:txid508771
Strain, strain background (Toxoplasma gondii)	Pru-tdTomato	PMID:19578440 John et al., 2009
Strain, strain background (Toxoplasma gondii)	CPS	PMID:11859373 Fox and Bzik, 2002
Antibody	Toxoplasma gondii Rabbit polyclonal	Collaborator		IHC: 1:100
Antibody	iNOS Rabbit polyclonal	Abcam	Cat # ab15323, RRID:AB_301857	IHC 1:50
Antibody	ERTR7 Af647 Rat monoclonal (sc-73355)	Santa Cruz Biotechnology	Cat # sc-73355 RRID:AB_1122890	IF (1:50)
Antibody	F4/80 BV480 Rat monoclonal (T45-2342)	BD	Cat # 565635 RRID:AB_2739313	IF (1:25)
Antibody	CD45 Af700 Rat monoclonal (30-F11)	BioLegend	Cat # 103127, RRID:AB_493714	IF (1:20)
Antibody	CD335 NKp46 PE/Dazzle 594 Rat monoclonal (29A1.4)	BioLegend	Cat # 137629, RRID:AB_2616665	FC (1:200)
Antibody	NK-1.1 BV711 Mouse monoclonal (PK136)	BioLegend	Cat # 108745, RRID:AB_2563286	FC (1:200)
Antibody	IFN gamma Af700 Rat monoclonal (XMG1.2)	Thermo Fisher	Cat # 56-7311-82, RRID:AB_2688063	FC (1:200)
Antibody	CD200 Receptor APC Rat monoclonal (OX110)	Thermo Fisher	Cat # 17-5201-82, RRID:AB_10717289	FC (1:200)
Antibody	T1/ST2 Biotin Rat monoclonal (DJ8)	MD Biosciences	Cat # 101001B, RRID:AB_947551	FC (1:200)
Antibody	T-bet PE-Cy7 Mouse monoclonal (4B10)	BioLegend	Cat # 644823	FC (1:200)
Antibody	EOMES PE Rat monoclonal (Dan11mag)	Thermo Fisher	Cat # 12-4875-82, RRID:AB_1603275	FC (1:200)
Antibody	CD11b ef450 Rat monoclonal (M1/70)	Thermo Fisher	Cat # 48-0112-80, RRID:AB_1582237	FC (1:1000)
Antibody	CD11c APC-ef780 Armenian hamster monoclonal (N418)	Thermo Fisher	Cat# 47-0114-80, RRID:AB_1548663	FC (1:200)
Antibody	Ly-6C BV785 Rat monoclonal (HK1.4)	BioLegend	Cat # 128041, RRID:AB_2565852	FC (1:200)
Antibody	Ly-6G BV711 Rat monoclonal (1A8)	BioLegend	Cat # 127643, RRID:AB_2565971	FC (1:200)
Antibody	CCR2 CD192 APC Rat monoclonal (SA203G11)	BioLegend	Cat # 150628, RRID:AB_2810415	FC (1:200)
Antibody	CD64 FcgammaRI PE-Cy7 Mouse monoclonal (X54-5/7.1)	BioLegend	Cat # 139306, RRID:AB_11219391	FC (1:200)
Antibody	MHC Class II (I-A/I-E) Af700 Rat monoclonal (M5/114.15.2)	Thermo Fisher	Cat # 56-5321-82, RRID:AB_494009	FC (1:200)
Antibody	iNOS APC Rat monoclonal (CXNFT)	Thermo Fisher	Cat # 17-5920-82, RRID:AB_2573244	FC (1:200)
Antibody	Podoplanin gp38 PerCP-ef710 Syrian hamster monoclonal (eBio8.1.1)	Thermo Fisher	Cat # 46-5381-82, RRID:AB_2848339	FC (1:200)
Antibody	CD31 BV605 Rat monoclonal (390)	BioLegend	Cat # 102427, RRID:AB_2563982	FC (1:200)
Peptide, recombinant protein	Recombinant murine IL-33	Peprotech	Cat # 210–33
Commercial assay or kit	IL-33 ELISA	R and D Biosystems	Cat # DY3626