| Literature DB >> 33928502 |
Kathryn Lawson-Wood1,2, Maisarah Jaafar1,3, Mónica Felipe-Sotelo4, Neil I Ward1.
Abstract
Some regions of Argentina are affected by high concentrations of molybdenum, arsenic and vanadium from natural sources in their groundwater. In particular, Mo levels in groundwater from Eduardo Castex (La Pampa, Argentina) typically exceed the guidelines for drinking water formerly established by WHO at 70 μg/L. Therefore, this study investigated the uptake of Mo in plants, using cress (Lepidium sativum L.) as a model using hydroponic experiments with synthetic solutions and groundwater from La Pampa. Cress grown from control experiments (150 μg/L Mo, pH 7) presented an average Mo concentration of 35.2 mg/kg (dry weight, d.w.), higher than the typical total plant range (0.7-2.5 mg/kg d.w.) in the literature. Using pooled groundwater samples (65.0-92.5 μg/L Mo) from wells of La Pampa (Argentina) as growth solutions resulted in significantly lower cress Mo levels (1.89-4.59 mg/kg d.w.) than were obtained for synthetic solutions of equivalent Mo concentration. This may be due to the high levels in these groundwater samples of As, V, Fe and Mn which are known to be associated with volcanic deposits. This research addressed the hitherto scarcity of data about the effect of various physicochemical parameters on the uptake of Mo in plants.Entities:
Keywords: Arsenic; Atomic spectroscopy; Groundwater; Hydroponics; Molybdenum; Plants; Uptake; Vanadium
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33928502 PMCID: PMC8410703 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-13902-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Validation of the trace elemental analysis by ICP-MS using standard reference materials (SRM) NIST SRM1640a—Trace Elements in Natural Water and INCT-PVTL-6 (Polish Virginia Tobacco Leaves, Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology)
| (SRM) 1640a—Trace Elements in Natural Water | |||||
| Element | Certified value(μg/L)a | Repeatability ( | Reproducibility ( | ||
| Calculated valueb (μg/L) | RSD (%)c | Calculated valueb (μg/L) | RSD (%) | ||
| Al | 52.6 ± 1.8 | 54.4 ± 0.5 | 0.9 | 53.8 ± 3.5 | 6.5 |
| V | 14.93 ± 0.21 | 14.0 ± 0.1 | 0.4 | 14.1 ± 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Cr | 40.22 ± 0.28 | 37.9 ± 0.1 | 0.3 | 38.3 ± 0.7 | 1.8 |
| Mn | 40.07 ± 0.35 | 38.6 ± 0.3 | 0.7 | 36.8 ± 1.6 | 4.3 |
| Fe | 36.5 ± 1.7 | 37.1 ± 0.2 | 0.5 | 36.5 ± 0.9 | 2.3 |
| Ni | 25.12 ± 0.12 | 23.9 ± 0.1 | 0.4 | 24.5 ± 0.6 | 2.4 |
| Co | 20.08 ± 0.24 | 19.1 ± 0.1 | 0.4 | 19.3 ± 1.0 | 5.2 |
| Cu | 85.07 ± 0.48 | 85.1 ± 0.8 | 1.0 | 85.0 ± 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Zn | 55.20 ± 0.32 | 53.8 ± 0.3 | 0.5 | 54.6 ± 4.9 | 9.0 |
| As | 8.010 ± 0.067 | 7.44 ± 0.03 | 0.4 | 7.40 ± 0.20 | 2.7 |
| Se | 19.97 ± 0.16 | 18.6 ± 0.1 | 0.5 | 19.6 ± 1.0 | 5.2 |
| Mo | 45.24 ± 0.59 | 43.0 ± 0.3 | 0.7 | 43.5 ± 1.1 | 2.4 |
| Cd | 3.961 ± 0.072 | 3.99 ± 0.04 | 1.0 | 3.86 ± 0.24 | 6.2 |
| Sb | 5.064 ± 0.045 | 5.05 ± 0.06 | 1.2 | 5.38 ± 0.33 | 6.1 |
| Pb | 12.005 ± 0.040 | 11.2 ± 0.1 | 1.1 | 10.7 ± 0.4 | 4.2 |
| U | 25.15 ± 0.26 | 25.4 ± 0.3 | 1.0 | 24.0 ± 1.3 | 5.3 |
| INCT-PVTL-6 (Polish Virginia Tobacco Leaves) | |||||
| Element | Certified valueb (μg/kg d.w.) | Calculated valueb (μg/kg d.w.) | RSD (%) | Calculated valueb (μg/kg d.w.) | RSD (%) |
| Mo | 396 ± 29 | 375 ± 4 | 1.0 | 381 ± 16 | 4.3 |
RSD relative standard deviation
aMean ± 2σ, where σ is the SE
bMean ± SD
Molybdenum concentrations of cress samples grown at different pH levels (6.0–8.0) in control (tap water, TW) and 150 μg/L Mo-spiked growth solutions from hydroponic studies, mean ± SD (n = 2)
| pH | Mo concentration of cress (mg/kg, d.w.) | |
|---|---|---|
| Control (TW) | Molybdenum solution (150 μg/L Mo) | |
| 6.0 | 1.38 ± 0.49 | 31.6 ± 1.0 |
| 6.5 | 1.42 ± 0.08 | 33.0 ± 1.6 |
| 7.0 | 1.29 ± 0.22 | 37.5 ± 7.8 |
| 7.5 | 1.18 ± 0.14 | 36.6 ± 3.5 |
| 8.0 | 1.81 ± 0.76 | 36.4 ± 0.8 |
Fig. 1Shoot and root lengths of cress grown in control solutions (tap water, <0.1 μg/L Mo) and tap water solutions spiked with 150 μg/L Mo at varying pH (6.0–8.0). Mean ± SD (n=15)
Fig. 2Shoot and root lengths of cress grown in tap water solutions at pH 7 with varying Mo dose (<0.1–7000 μg/L Mo). Mean ± SD. Note: the insert shows the relationship for cress grown in <0.1–200 μg/L Mo
Fig. 3Mo concentrations in cress growing in hydroponic solutions with different Mo doses (<0.1–7000 μg/L Mo). Mean ± SD (n=2). Note: the insert shows the relationship for cress grown in <0.1–200 μg/L Mo
Elemental concentrations in cress samples grown in tap water spiked with 150 μg/L Mo, adjusted at pH 7, with and without the addition of concomitant ions: Fe (20–1000 μg/L), Mn (20–1300 μg/L) and Al (10–500 μg/L)
| Concentration of concomitantions in spiked tap water (μg/L)* | Element concentration in cress | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mo | Fe | Mn | Al | |
| No added concomitants | 35 8 ± 3.0 | 69.8 ± 2.4 | 45.4 ± 1.1 | 4.70 ± 1.18 |
| 20 μg/L Fe | 22.1 ± 2.6 | 50.0 ± 1.1 | 5.30 ± 1.28 | |
| 100 μg/L Fe | 28.8 ± 1.3 | 44.3 ± 0.9 | 4.50 ± 1.09 | |
| 1000 μg/L Fe | 33.1 ± 1.6 | 43.3 ± 0.7 | 5.59 ± 1.35 | |
| 20 μg/L Mn | 30.6 ± 1.4 | 71.4 ±2.4 | 3.66 ± 0.92 | |
| 400 μg/L Mn | 28.7 ± 3.4 | 63.5 ± 2.2 | 4.65 ± 1.16 | |
| 1300 μg/L Mn | 27.8 ± 3.3 | 75.4 ± 2.6 | 2.63 ± 0.68 | |
| 10 μg/L Al | 29.0 ± 2.2 | 68.5 ± 2.3 | 49.7 ± 1.3 | |
| 50 μg/L Al | 23.2 ± 2.8 | 68.3 ± 2.4 | 48.0 ± 0.8 | |
| 500 μg/L Al | 32.1 ± 1.5 | 65.2 ± 2.2 | 46.7 ± 1.0 | |
Values in bold characters indicate those samples in which element concentrations in the growth solutions were spiked over the backgound level
*All solutions containing the same concentration of Mo (150 μg/L)
Trace element levels of growth solutions (tap water, commercial plant nutrient solution and groundwater from La Pampa, Argentina) and levels in cress hydroponically grown in the respective solutions
| Element | Trace element levels in growth solution (mean ± SD μg/L, | Trace element levels in plant material (mean ± SD mg/kg, d.w., | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tap water+ Mo | Plant feed#in DDW + Mo | La Pampa GW1 | La Pampa GW2 | Tap water+ Mo | Plant feed# inDIW + Mo | La Pampa GW1 | La Pampa GW2 | |
| Al | 1.60 ± 0.12 | 1.70 ± 0.21 | 19.0 ± 0.7 | 133 ± 1 | 3.9 ± 1.1 | 5.5 ± 1.4 | 18.5 ±2.2 | 58.0 ± 7.0 |
| V | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 432 ± 9 | 278 ± 5 | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 3.48 ± 0.87 | 0.83 ±0.25 |
| Cr | 0.53 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 1.08 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 1.12 ± 0.08 | 1.09 ± 0.09 | 0.92 ± 0.07 | 6.52 ± 2.05 |
| Mn | 0.31 ± 0.02 | 43.9 ± 0.4 | 0.29 ± 0.12 | 235 ± 6 | 49.1 ± 9.2 | 66.3 ± 5.7 | 39.5 ± 7.4 | 77.3 ± 6.6 |
| Fe | 4.66 ± 0.06 | 163 ± 6 | 24.0 ± 0.1 | 108 ± 7 | 68.1 ± 2.3 | 81.1 ± 5.8 | 66.6 ± 2.3 | 223 ± 16 |
| Ni | 2.67 ± 0.02 | 0.61 ± 0.01 | 1.46 ± 0.01 | 1.54 ± 0.10 | 5.4 ± 1.7 | 2.92 ± 0.20 | 1.97 ± 0.10 | 3.76 ± 0.25 |
| Co | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 0.39 ± 0.04 | 0.80 ± 0.08 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 0.53 ± 0.02 |
| Cu | 227 ± 1 | 11.6 ± 0.1 | 4.94 ± 0.10 | 3.14 ± 0.12 | 33.8 ± 4.2 | 15.8 ± 2.6 | 6.84 ± 1.12 | 8.80 ± 1.10 |
| Zn | 26.4 ± 0.2 | 71.5 ± 0.3 | 5.60 ± 0.11 | 17.4 ± 1.9 | 84.5 ± 4.2 | 103 ± 2 | 59.2 ± 0.9 | 134 ± 2 |
| As | 0.17 ± 0.02 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 969 ± 64 | 23.7 ± 0.2 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.03 | 4.73 ± 1.07 | 6.94 ± 1.57 |
| Se | < 0.4* | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 17.7 ± 0.1 | 6.30 ± 0.15 | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 0.18 ± 0.00 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.32 ± 0.05 |
| Cd | < 0.002* | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.17 ± 0.01 | 0.36 ± 0.04 | 0.31 ± 0.02 | 0.34 ± 0.01 | 0.71 ± 0.04 |
| Sb | 0.10 ± 0.01 | < 0.02* | 0.80 ± 0.03 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | < 0.002** | < 0.002** | < 0.002** | < 0.002** |
| Pb | 0.21 ± 0.01 | < 0.04* | < 0.04* | < 0.04* | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.17 ± 0.01 |
| U | 0.16 ± 0.01 | < 0.0002* | 94.0 ± 3.7 | 14.9 ± 0.2 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.95 ± 0.08 | 0.79 ± 0.05 |
Values in bold characters indicate those samples in which element concentrations in the growth solutions were spiked over the backgound level
DDW: doubly distilled water (18 mΩ/cm); GW: groundwater
#Commercial plant nutrient solution, Baby Bio (0.01% in DDW)
##As spiked
*Below instrumental LOD (limit of detection)
**Below LOD for the analytical method (including sample pre-treatment and dilution)
Fig. 4Representation of the weight vector (w1) of the first latent variable, obtained from the PLS model for the prediction of the levels of Mo in the cultivated cress using the concentration of elements present in the growth solutions as the predicting variables