Literature DB >> 33928265

Development of an automated ERCP Quality Report Card using structured data fields.

Gregory A Coté1, B Joseph Elmunzer1, Erin Forster1, Robert A Moran1, John G Quiles2,3, Daniel S Strand2, Dushant S Uppal2, Andrew Y Wang2, Peter B Cotton1, Michael G McMurtry4, James M Scheiman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Measuring adherence to ERCP quality indicators (QIs) is confounded by variability in indications, maneuvers, and documentation styles. We hypothesized that incorporation of mandatory, structured data fields within reporting software would permit accurate measurement of QI adherence rates and facilitate generation of a provider ERCP report card.
METHODS: At two referral centers, endoscopy documentation software was modified to generate provider alerts prior to finalizing the note. The alerts reminded the provider to document the following components in a standardized manner: indication, altered anatomy, prior interventions, and QIs deemed high priority by society consensus, study authors, or both. Adherence rates for each QI were calculated in aggregate and by provider via data extraction directly from the procedure documentation software. Medical records were reviewed manually to measure the accuracy of automated data extraction. Accuracy of automated measurement for each QI was calculated against results derived by manual review.
RESULTS: During the 9-month study period, 1,376 ERCP procedures were completed by 8 providers. Manual medical record review confirmed high (98-100%) accuracy of automatic extraction of ERCP QIs from the endoscopy report, including cannulation rate of the native papilla and complete extraction of common bile duct stones. An ERCP report card was generated, allowing for individual comparison of adherence to ERCP QIs with colleagues at their institution and others.
CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, use of mandatory, structured data fields within clinical ERCP reports permit the accurate measurement of high priority ERCP QIs and the subsequent generation of interval report cards.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benchmarking; Cholangiopancreatography; Electronic Health Records; Endoscopic Retrograde; Health Care; Quality Indicators

Year:  2021        PMID: 33928265      PMCID: PMC8078858          DOI: 10.1016/j.tige.2021.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Innov Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 2590-0307


  27 in total

1.  Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: a new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data.

Authors:  S M Schutz; R M Abbott
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Relationship among hospital ERCP volume, length of stay, and technical outcomes.

Authors:  Shyam Varadarajulu; Meredith L Kilgore; Charles M Wilcox; Mohamad A Eloubeidi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  A survey of credentialing for ERCP in the United States.

Authors:  Peter B Cotton; Derek Feussner; Darin Dufault; Gregory Cote
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death.

Authors:  Michal F Kaminski; Paulina Wieszczy; Maciej Rupinski; Urszula Wojciechowska; Joanna Didkowska; Ewa Kraszewska; Jaroslaw Kobiela; Robert Franczyk; Maria Rupinska; Bartlomiej Kocot; Anna Chaber-Ciopinska; Jacek Pachlewski; Marcin Polkowski; Jaroslaw Regula
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Setting minimum standards for training in EUS and ERCP: results from a prospective multicenter study evaluating learning curves and competence among advanced endoscopy trainees.

Authors:  Sachin Wani; Samuel Han; Violette Simon; Matthew Hall; Dayna Early; Eva Aagaard; Wasif M Abidi; Subhas Banerjee; Todd H Baron; Michael Bartel; Erik Bowman; Brian C Brauer; Jonathan M Buscaglia; Linda Carlin; Amitabh Chak; Hemant Chatrath; Abhishek Choudhary; Bradley Confer; Gregory A Coté; Koushik K Das; Christopher J DiMaio; Andrew M Dries; Steven A Edmundowicz; Abdul Hamid El Chafic; Ihab El Hajj; Swan Ellert; Jason Ferreira; Anthony Gamboa; Ian S Gan; Lisa Gangarosa; Bhargava Gannavarapu; Stuart R Gordon; Nalini M Guda; Hazem T Hammad; Cynthia Harris; Sujai Jalaj; Paul Jowell; Sana Kenshil; Jason Klapman; Michael L Kochman; Sri Komanduri; Gabriel Lang; Linda S Lee; David E Loren; Frank J Lukens; Daniel Mullady; Raman V Muthusamy; Andrew S Nett; Mojtaba S Olyaee; Kavous Pakseresht; Pranith Perera; Patrick Pfau; Cyrus Piraka; John M Poneros; Amit Rastogi; Anthony Razzak; Brian Riff; Shreyas Saligram; James M Scheiman; Isaiah Schuster; Raj J Shah; Rishi Sharma; Joshua P Spaete; Ajaypal Singh; Muhammad Sohail; Jayaprakash Sreenarasimhaiah; Tyler Stevens; James H Tabibian; Demetrios Tzimas; Dushant S Uppal; Shiro Urayama; Domenico Vitterbo; Andrew Y Wang; Wahid Wassef; Patrick Yachimski; Sergio Zepeda-Gomez; Tobias Zuchelli; Rajesh N Keswani
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice.

Authors:  Earl J Williams; Steve Taylor; Peter Fairclough; Adrian Hamlyn; Richard F Logan; Derrick Martin; Stuart A Riley; Peter Veitch; Mark Wilkinson; Paula R Williamson; Martin Lombard
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Dumonceau; Christine Kapral; Lars Aabakken; Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Andrea Tringali; Geoffroy Vanbiervliet; Torsten Beyna; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Istvan Hritz; Alberto Mariani; Gregorios Paspatis; Franco Radaelli; Sundeep Lakhtakia; Andrew M Veitch; Jeanin E van Hooft
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  Competence in Endoscopic Ultrasound and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography, From Training Through Independent Practice.

Authors:  Sachin Wani; Rajesh N Keswani; Samuel Han; Eva M Aagaard; Matthew Hall; Violette Simon; Wasif M Abidi; Subhas Banerjee; Todd H Baron; Michael Bartel; Erik Bowman; Brian C Brauer; Jonathan M Buscaglia; Linda Carlin; Amitabh Chak; Hemant Chatrath; Abhishek Choudhary; Bradley Confer; Gregory A Coté; Koushik K Das; Christopher J DiMaio; Andrew M Dries; Steven A Edmundowicz; Abdul Hamid El Chafic; Ihab El Hajj; Swan Ellert; Jason Ferreira; Anthony Gamboa; Ian S Gan; Lisa M Gangarosa; Bhargava Gannavarapu; Stuart R Gordon; Nalini M Guda; Hazem T Hammad; Cynthia Harris; Sujai Jalaj; Paul S Jowell; Sana Kenshil; Jason Klapman; Michael L Kochman; Srinadh Komanduri; Gabriel Lang; Linda S Lee; David E Loren; Frank J Lukens; Daniel Mullady; V Raman Muthusamy; Andrew S Nett; Mojtaba S Olyaee; Kavous Pakseresht; Pranith Perera; Patrick Pfau; Cyrus Piraka; John M Poneros; Amit Rastogi; Anthony Razzak; Brian Riff; Shreyas Saligram; James M Scheiman; Isaiah Schuster; Raj J Shah; Rishi Sharma; Joshua P Spaete; Ajaypal Singh; Muhammad Sohail; Jayaprakash Sreenarasimhaiah; Tyler Stevens; James H Tabibian; Demetrios Tzimas; Dushant S Uppal; Shiro Urayama; Domenico Vitterbo; Andrew Y Wang; Wahid Wassef; Patrick Yachimski; Sergio Zepeda-Gomez; Tobias Zuchelli; Dayna Early
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 9.  Defining and measuring quality of care: a perspective from US researchers.

Authors:  R H Brook; E A McGlynn; P G Shekelle
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.038

10.  Lower provider volume is associated with higher failure rates for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Gregory A Coté; Timothy D Imler; Huiping Xu; Evgenia Teal; Dustin D French; Thomas F Imperiale; Marc B Rosenman; Jeffery Wilson; Siu L Hui; Stuart Sherman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.