Théo Charnay1, Véronique Blanck1, Mathieu Cerino1,2, Marc Bartoli2, Florence Riccardi1,2, Nathalie Bonello-Palot1,2, Christophe Pécheux1, Karine Nguyen1,2, Nicolas Lévy1,2,3, Svetlana Gorokhova4,5, Martin Krahn6,7. 1. Service de Génétique Médicale, Hôpital de la Timone, APHM, Marseille, France. 2. Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, MMG, U 1251, Marseille, France. 3. Genetics Institute for Patients, Therapies Innovation and Science (GIPTIS), Marseille, France. 4. Service de Génétique Médicale, Hôpital de la Timone, APHM, Marseille, France. svetlana.gorokhova@univ-amu.fr. 5. Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, MMG, U 1251, Marseille, France. svetlana.gorokhova@univ-amu.fr. 6. Service de Génétique Médicale, Hôpital de la Timone, APHM, Marseille, France. martin.krahn@univ-amu.fr. 7. Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, MMG, U 1251, Marseille, France. martin.krahn@univ-amu.fr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Recent evolution of sequencing technologies and the development of international standards in variant interpretation have profoundly changed the diagnostic approaches in clinical genetics. As a consequence, many variants that were initially claimed to be disease-causing can be now reclassified as benign or uncertain in light of the new data available. Unfortunately, the misclassified variants are still present in the scientific literature and variant databases, greatly interfering with interpretation of diagnostic sequencing results. Despite the urgent need, large-scale efforts to update the classifications of these variants are still not sufficient. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 176 DYSF gene variants that were identified in dysferlinopathy patients referred to the Marseille Medical Genetics Department for diagnostic sequencing since 2001. RESULTS: We reclassified all variants into five-tier American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) pathogenicity classes, revealing changed pathogenicity for 17 variants. We then updated the information for the variants that have been previously published in the variant database and submitted 46 additional DYSF variants. CONCLUSION: Besides direct benefit for dysferlinopathy diagnostics, our study contributes to the much needed effort to reanalyze variants from previously published cohorts and to work with curators of variant databases to update the entries for erroneously classified variants.
PURPOSE: Recent evolution of sequencing technologies and the development of international standards in variant interpretation have profoundly changed the diagnostic approaches in clinical genetics. As a consequence, many variants that were initially claimed to be disease-causing can be now reclassified as benign or uncertain in light of the new data available. Unfortunately, the misclassified variants are still present in the scientific literature and variant databases, greatly interfering with interpretation of diagnostic sequencing results. Despite the urgent need, large-scale efforts to update the classifications of these variants are still not sufficient. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 176 DYSF gene variants that were identified in dysferlinopathy patients referred to the Marseille Medical Genetics Department for diagnostic sequencing since 2001. RESULTS: We reclassified all variants into five-tier American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) pathogenicity classes, revealing changed pathogenicity for 17 variants. We then updated the information for the variants that have been previously published in the variant database and submitted 46 additional DYSF variants. CONCLUSION: Besides direct benefit for dysferlinopathy diagnostics, our study contributes to the much needed effort to reanalyze variants from previously published cohorts and to work with curators of variant databases to update the entries for erroneously classified variants.
Authors: Karine Nguyen; Guillaume Bassez; Rafaëlle Bernard; Martin Krahn; Véronique Labelle; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Jean Pouget; El Hadi Hammouda; Christophe Béroud; Andoni Urtizberea; Bruno Eymard; France Leturcq; Nicolas Lévy Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Callum J Bell; Darrell L Dinwiddie; Neil A Miller; Shannon L Hateley; Elena E Ganusova; Joann Mudge; Ray J Langley; Lu Zhang; Clarence C Lee; Faye D Schilkey; Vrunda Sheth; Jimmy E Woodward; Heather E Peckham; Gary P Schroth; Ryan W Kim; Stephen F Kingsmore Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Martin Krahn; Christophe Béroud; Véronique Labelle; Karine Nguyen; Rafaëlle Bernard; Guillaume Bassez; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Carla Fernandez; Julien Bouvenot; Isabelle Richard; Elisabeth Ollagnon-Roman; Jorge A Bevilacqua; Eric Salvo; Shahram Attarian; Françoise Chapon; Jean-François Pellissier; Jean Pouget; El Hadi Hammouda; Pascal Laforêt; Jon Andoni Urtizberea; Bruno Eymard; France Leturcq; Nicolas Lévy Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: R Bashir; S Britton; T Strachan; S Keers; E Vafiadaki; M Lako; I Richard; S Marchand; N Bourg; Z Argov; M Sadeh; I Mahjneh; G Marconi; M R Passos-Bueno; E de S Moreira; M Zatz; J S Beckmann; K Bushby Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: J Liu; M Aoki; I Illa; C Wu; M Fardeau; C Angelini; C Serrano; J A Urtizberea; F Hentati; M B Hamida; S Bohlega; E J Culper; A A Amato; K Bossie; J Oeltjen; K Bejaoui; D McKenna-Yasek; B A Hosler; E Schurr; K Arahata; P J de Jong; R H Brown Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Nicola Whiffin; Eric Minikel; Roddy Walsh; Anne H O'Donnell-Luria; Konrad Karczewski; Alexander Y Ing; Paul J R Barton; Birgit Funke; Stuart A Cook; Daniel MacArthur; James S Ware Journal: Genet Med Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 8.822