Literature DB >> 3392719

Euthanasia, letting die and the pause.

G Gillett1.   

Abstract

There is a marked disparity between medical intuitions and philosophical argument about euthanasia. In this paper I argue that the following objections can be raised. First, medical intuitions are against it and this is an area in which judgement and sensitivity are required in that death is a unique and complex process and the patient has many needs including the need to know that others have not discounted his or her worth. Also, part of the moral constitution of a good doctor is a devotion to the protection and preservation of life whatever reasons are produced to dissuade her. Finally, we do not know what the final events of a person's life might hold.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Death and Euthanasia; Philosophical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3392719      PMCID: PMC1375555          DOI: 10.1136/jme.14.2.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  4 in total

1.  Voluntary euthanasia and the inalienable right to life.

Authors:  Joel Feinberg
Journal:  Philos Public Aff       Date:  1978

2.  A good death: who best to bring it?

Authors:  Roger Crisp
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 1.898

3.  Taking human life.

Authors:  Dan W Brock
Journal:  Ethics       Date:  1985-07

4.  Why let people die?

Authors:  G R Gillett
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.903

  4 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Emotions in Bioethical Decision-making.

Authors:  Shimon M Glick
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2022-09-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.