| Literature DB >> 33927016 |
Claire F McGroder1, David Zhang1, Mohammad A Choudhury1, Mary M Salvatore2, Belinda M D'Souza2, Eric A Hoffman3, Ying Wei4, Matthew R Baldwin1, Christine Kim Garcia5,6.
Abstract
The risk factors for development of fibrotic-like radiographic abnormalities after severe COVID-19 are incompletely described and the extent to which CT findings correlate with symptoms and physical function after hospitalisation remains unclear. At 4 months after hospitalisation, fibrotic-like patterns were more common in those who underwent mechanical ventilation (72%) than in those who did not (20%). We demonstrate that severity of initial illness, duration of mechanical ventilation, lactate dehydrogenase on admission and leucocyte telomere length are independent risk factors for fibrotic-like radiographic abnormalities. These fibrotic-like changes correlate with lung function, cough and measures of frailty, but not with dyspnoea. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; imaging/CT MRI etc; interstitial fibrosis; respiratory measurement; viral infection
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33927016 PMCID: PMC8103561 DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-217031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Thorax ISSN: 0040-6376 Impact factor: 9.102
Figure 1High-resolution CT (HRCT) scans of the chest from COVID-19 survivors. (A) Representative CT chest scans demonstrating no abnormalities (left), non-fibrotic patterns (middle) and fibrotic-like patterns (right). The upper panels show a coronal section and the lower panels show an axial image at the level just below the carina. The scan with a non-fibrotic pattern had a ground glass opacities (GGO) score of 5.6 (84th percentile in the group). The CT scan with a fibrotic-like pattern had a reticulation score of 6.4 (98th percentile), a traction bronchiectasis score of 5.0 (95th percentile) and no honeycombing. (B) Chest HRCT scores for radiographic patterns observed in the study cohort. The middle line of the boxplot represents the median score; bottom and top lines represent the 25th and 75th percentile, respectively. Where no lines are seen, the 25th, 50th and 75th percentile scores were all 0. The extent of each pattern was graded using a scoring system developed by ARDSnet.7 The possible range of scores was 0–20 from all categories of abnormalities, except traction bronchiectasis, which had a possible range of 0–5.
Spearman correlation coefficients of radiographic and dyspnoea scores with pulmonary function, 6-minute walk distance, frailty and symptoms
| DLCO (% predicted) | FVC (% predicted) | 6MWD (m) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ground glass opacities | 0.12 | −0.34 |
| 0.06 | −0.25 |
| 0 | −0.02 | 0.92 |
| Reticulations | 0.41 | −0.64 |
| 0.04 | −0.21 | 0.07 | 0 | −0.02 | 0.8 |
| Traction bronchiectasis | 0.24 | −0.49 |
| 0.05 | −0.23 |
| 0 | −0.05 | 0.69 |
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ground glass opacities | 0.21 | 0.46 |
| 0 | 0.07 | 0.56 | 0.02 | 0.14 | 0.23 |
| Reticulations | 0.05 | 0.23 |
| 0.07 | 0.26 |
| 0 | 0.05 | 0.66 |
| Traction bronchiectasis | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.25 |
| 0 | 0.07 | 0.57 |
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| UCSD SOBQ | 0.02 | −0.14 | 0.24 | 0.06 | −0.25 |
| 0.06 | −0.25 |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| UCSD SOBQ | 0.22 | 0.47 |
| 0.14 | −0.37 |
| 0.05 | −0.21 | 0.06 |
*Significant after controlling for false discovery using the Benjamini-Hochberg method at a false discovery rate of 0.10.
DLCO, diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide; 6MWD, 6-minute walk distance; UCSD SOBQ, University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire.
Figure 2Continuous associations of fibrotic-like patterns with admission Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (top left), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels (top right), duration of mechanical ventilation in days (bottom left) and age-adjusted leucocyte telomere length percentile (bottom right) using generalised additive models with locally weighted smoothing (LOESS). Blue line represents predicted values. Black dashed lines are 95% CIs. Hash marks along the x-axis indicate individual study participants. Since there was no evidence for non-linearity in the generalised additive models, we estimated adjusted ORs using logistic regression models. All models are adjusted for a common set of potential confounders (age, sex, race/ethnicity, days since infection, body mass index, pack-years of smoking, treatment with steroids while hospitalised) and the other independent variables of interest (SOFA score, LDH, days of mechanical ventilation, telomere length). OR for SOFA score is per point increase, for LDH is per 50-point increase, for mechanical ventilation is per day increase, and for telomere length is per 10% decrease in percent-predicted value.