Literature DB >> 33926582

Building impactful systems-focused simulations: integrating change and project management frameworks into the pre-work phase.

Mirette Dubé1,2, Glenn Posner3,4,5,6, Kimberly Stone7,8, Marjorie White9,10,11,12,13, Alyshah Kaba14,15, Komal Bajaj16,17, Adam Cheng18,19,20, Vincent Grant14,18,19,20, Simon Huang21, Jennifer Reid7,8.   

Abstract

Healthcare organizations strive to deliver safe, high-quality, efficient care. These complex systems frequently harbor gaps, which if unmitigated, could result in harm. Systems-focused simulation (SFS) projects, which include systems-focused debriefing (SFD), if well designed and executed, can proactively and comprehensively identify gaps and test and improve systems, enabling institutions to improve safety and quality before patients and staff are placed at risk.The previously published systems-focused debriefing framework, Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS) for Systems Integration (PSI), describes a systematic approach to SFD. It includes an essential "pre-work" phase, encompassing evidence-informed steps that lead up to a SFD. Despite inclusion in the PSI framework, a detailed description of the pre-work phase, and how each component facilitates change management, was limited.The goal of this paper is to elucidate the PSI "Pre-work" phase, everything leading up to the systems-focused simulation and debriefing. It describes how the integration of project and change management principles ensures that a comprehensive collection of safety and quality issues are reliably identified and captured.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Change management; Patient safety; Project management; Quality improvement; Simulation; System improvement; Systems integration; Systems simulation; Systems-focused debriefing

Year:  2021        PMID: 33926582     DOI: 10.1186/s41077-021-00169-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)        ISSN: 2059-0628


  7 in total

1.  Using simulation to improve patient safety: dawn of a new era.

Authors:  Adam Cheng; Vincent Grant; Marc Auerbach
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 2.  The architecture of safety: hospital design.

Authors:  Anjali Joseph; Mahbub Rashid
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.687

3.  What has change management in industry got to do with improving patient safety?

Authors:  Douglas J Noble; Claire Lemer; Emma Stanton
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  In situ simulation: detection of safety threats and teamwork training in a high risk emergency department.

Authors:  Mary D Patterson; Gary Lee Geis; Richard A Falcone; Thomas LeMaster; Robert L Wears
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 7.035

5.  SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients.

Authors:  Richard J Holden; Pascale Carayon; Ayse P Gurses; Peter Hoonakker; Ann Schoofs Hundt; A Ant Ozok; A Joy Rivera-Rodriguez
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Failure mode and effects analysis outputs: are they valid?

Authors:  Nada Atef Shebl; Bryony Dean Franklin; Nick Barber
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Prevent Safety Threats in New Construction through Integration of Simulation and FMEA.

Authors:  Nora Colman; Kimberly Stone; Jennifer Arnold; Cara Doughty; Jennifer Reid; Sarah Younker; Kiran B Hebbar
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2019-06-24
  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Simulation changing the face of healthcare improvement: a silver lining from the COVID-19 pandemic?

Authors:  Victoria Brazil; Mirette Dubé
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.929

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.