Literature DB >> 33926408

An age-dependent outcome analysis of microvascular decompression and percutaneous thermocoagulation in trigeminal neuralgia.

Naureen Keric1, Darius Kalasauskas2, Sophia L Kreth2, Martin B Glaser2, Harald Krenzlin2, Sven R Kantelhardt2, Florian Ringel2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a severe pain condition and the most common facial neuralgia. While microvascular decompression (MVD) presents an excellent treatment in neurovascular compression cases, percutaneous thermocoagulation (PT) of the ganglion Gasseri is an alternative option. This study aimed to evaluate post-operative complication rate and outcome of both treatment strategies related to the patient's age.
METHODS: The medical records of all patients with the diagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia undergoing an MVD or PT of the ganglion Gasseri (between January 2007 and September 2017) were reviewed to determine the efficacy and the complication rate of both methods in regard to the patient's age.
RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients underwent MVD surgery and 39 a PT. The mean age of patients in the MVD group was 61 years and 73 years in the PT group. There were 59 (50%) female patients. Nerve-vessel conflict could be identified in 78 (98.7%) MVD and 17 (43.6%) PT patients on preoperative MRI. Charlson comorbidity index was significantly higher in PT group (2.4 (1.8) versus 3.8 (1.8) p < 0.001). The Barrow pain score (BPS) at the last follow-up demonstrated higher scores after PT (p = 0.007). The complication rate was markedly higher in PT group, mostly due to the facial hypesthesia (84.6% versus 27.8%; p < 0.001). Mean symptom-free survival was significantly shorter in the PT group (9 vs. 26 months, p < 0.001). It remained statistically significant when stratified into age groups: (65 years and older: 9 vs. 18 months, p = 0.001). Duration of symptoms (OR 1.005, 95% CI 1.000-1.010), primary procedure (OR 6.198, 95% CI 2.650-14.496), patient age (OR 1.033, 95% CI 1.002-1.066), and postoperative complication rate (OR 2.777, 95% CI 1.309-5.890) were associated with treatment failure.
CONCLUSION: In this patient series, the MVD is confirmed to be an excellent treatment option independent of patient's age. However, while PT is an effective procedure, time to pain recurrence is shorter, and the favorable outcome (BPS 1 and 2) rate is lower compared to MVD. Hence MVD should be the preferred treatment and PT should remain an alternative in very selected cases when latter is not possible but not in the elderly patient per se.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Microvascular decompression; Old; Percutaneous thermocoagulation; Trigeminal neuralgia

Year:  2021        PMID: 33926408     DOI: 10.1186/s12883-021-02197-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Neurol        ISSN: 1471-2377            Impact factor:   2.474


  7 in total

1.  Long-Term Therapeutic Effect of Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia: Kaplan-Meier Analysis in a Consecutive Series of 425 Patients.

Authors:  Yongxu Wei; Chunhua Pu; Ning Li; Yu Cai; Hanbing Shang; Weiguo Zhao
Journal:  Turk Neurosurg       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.003

2.  Treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: comparison of long-term outcome after radiofrequency rhizotomy and microvascular decompression.

Authors:  V M Tronnier; D Rasche; J Hamer; A L Kienle; S Kunze
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: comments on a series of 250 cases, including 10 patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  G Broggi; P Ferroli; A Franzini; D Servello; I Dones
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Microvascular Decompression for Idiopathic Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia in Patients Over 75 Years of Age.

Authors:  Hua Zhao; Yinda Tang; Xin Zhang; Shiting Li
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 5.  Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia in the elderly: a review of the safety and efficacy.

Authors:  Keyoumars Ashkan; Henry Marsh
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 6.  Microvascular decompression for elderly patients with trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Prashanth J Rao; Mark Dexter
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 1.961

7.  Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia in the elderly: long-term treatment outcome and comparison with younger patients.

Authors:  Thomas Günther; Venelin M Gerganov; Lennart Stieglitz; Wolf Ludemann; Amir Samii; Madjid Samii
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.654

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Correlation study between multiplanar reconstruction trigeminal nerve angulation and trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Tao Sun; Qinghao Huang; Chuangfeng Li; Wensheng Yang; Wentao Wang; Longshuang He; Jinlong Liu; Chao Yang
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 2.903

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.