Literature DB >> 33925765

Incorporating Cascade Effects of Genetic Testing in Economic Evaluation: A Scoping Review of Methodological Challenges.

Alexandra Cernat1,2, Robin Z Hayeems1,2, Lisa A Prosser3,4, Wendy J Ungar1,2.   

Abstract

Cascade genetic testing is indicated for family members of individuals testing positive on a genetic test, and is particularly relevant for child health because of their vulnerability and the long-term health and economic implications. Cascade testing has patient- and health system-level implications; however cascade costs and health effects are not routinely considered in economic evaluation. The methodological challenges associated with incorporating cascade effects in economic evaluation require examination. The purpose of this scoping review was to identify published economic evaluations that considered cascade genetic testing. Citation databases were searched for English-language economic evaluations reporting on cascade genetic testing. Nineteen publications were included. In four, genetic testing was used to identify new index patients-cascade effects were also considered; thirteen assessed cascade genetic testing strategies for the identification of at-risk relatives; and two calculated the costs of cascade genetic testing as a secondary objective. Methodological challenges associated with incorporating cascade effects in economic evaluation are related to study design, costing, measurement and valuation of health outcomes, and modeling. As health economic studies may currently be underestimating both the cost and health benefits attributable to genetic technologies through omission of cascade effects, development of methods to address these difficulties is required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cascade testing; economic evaluation; genetic testing; methodology; scoping review

Year:  2021        PMID: 33925765     DOI: 10.3390/children8050346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Children (Basel)        ISSN: 2227-9067


  40 in total

1.  Parent-child genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia in an Australian context.

Authors:  Jing Pang; Andrew C Martin; Timothy R Bates; Amanda J Hooper; Damon A Bell; John R Burnett; Richard Norman; Gerald F Watts
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 1.954

Review 2.  Family Spillover Effects in Pediatric Cost-Utility Analyses.

Authors:  Tara A Lavelle; Brittany N D'Cruz; Babak Mohit; Wendy J Ungar; Lisa A Prosser; Kate Tsiplova; Montserrat Vera-Llonch; Pei-Jung Lin
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.561

3.  Analyzing the concept of spillover effects for expanded inclusion in health economics research.

Authors:  K Jane Muir; Jessica Keim-Malpass
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 1.744

4.  Canadian Cardiovascular Society Position Statement on Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Update 2018.

Authors:  Liam R Brunham; Isabelle Ruel; Sumayah Aljenedil; Jean-Baptiste Rivière; Alexis Baass; Jack V Tu; G B John Mancini; Paolo Raggi; Milan Gupta; Patrick Couture; Glen J Pearson; Jean Bergeron; Gordon A Francis; Brian W McCrindle; Katherine Morrison; Julie St-Pierre; Mélanie Henderson; Robert A Hegele; Jacques Genest; Jeannette Goguen; Daniel Gaudet; Guillaume Paré; Jacques Romney; Thomas Ransom; Sophie Bernard; Pamela Katz; Tisha R Joy; David Bewick; James Brophy
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.223

5.  Cascade Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolemia and the Use of Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Joshua W Knowles; Daniel J Rader; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Recent progress in Lynch syndrome and other familial colorectal cancer syndromes.

Authors:  Patrick M Boland; Matthew B Yurgelun; C Richard Boland
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis of cascade screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia using alternative diagnostic and identification strategies.

Authors:  L Nherera; D Marks; R Minhas; M Thorogood; S E Humphries
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Caring for Carers: Positive and Normative Challenges for Future Research on Carer Spillover Effects in Economic Evaluation.

Authors:  Padraig Dixon; Jeff Round
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.725

9.  A cost-effectiveness model of genetic testing and periodical clinical screening for the evaluation of families with dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Max Catchpool; Jay Ramchand; Melissa Martyn; David L Hare; Paul A James; Alison H Trainer; Josh Knight; Ilias Goranitis
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.

Authors:  Zachary Munn; Micah D J Peters; Cindy Stern; Catalin Tufanaru; Alexa McArthur; Edoardo Aromataris
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  1 in total

1.  Swiss cost-effectiveness analysis of universal screening for Lynch syndrome of patients with colorectal cancer followed by cascade genetic testing of relatives.

Authors:  Simon Wieser; Maria C Katapodi; Islam Salikhanov; Karl Heinimann; Pierre Chappuis; Nicole Buerki; Rossella Graffeo; Viola Heinzelmann; Manuela Rabaglio; Monica Taborelli
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 5.941

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.