Literature DB >> 3392566

Cerebrospinal fluid diversion in the treatment of benign intracranial hypertension.

I Johnston1, M Besser, M K Morgan.   

Abstract

Thirty-six patients from a consecutive series of 41 patients with benign intracranial hypertension (BIH) were treated by cerebrospinal fluid shunting. In 12 patients this was selected as the primary treatment due to the severe deterioration of vision or concern regarding the possible adverse effects of steroids; all 12 patients showed rapid and complete resolution of the disease, although eight patients still have a shunt in place. In 24 patients a shunt was inserted when other forms of treatment failed; all of these patients showed rapid resolution of the condition, although 20 patients still have a shunt in place. Three patients had the shunt removed without sequelae, and one patient in whom the shunt was removed because of low-pressure symptoms remains symptomatic with persistent papilledema (over 6 years). The percutaneous lumboperitoneal (LP) shunt was associated with the lowest revision and complication rates. Cisternal shunting to either the atrium or pleural cavity was next most effective, whereas valved LP shunts inserted via a laminectomy were least effective; ventricular shunts were used in only two cases. Shunting is therefore very effective in the treatment of BIH, but the significant complication rate and the possibility of inducing shunt dependence must be recognized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3392566     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1988.69.2.0195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  17 in total

1.  Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Lumboperitoneal shunt for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: patients' selection and outcome.

Authors:  Waleed F El-Saadany; Ahmed Farhoud; Ihab Zidan
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  Pseudotumor cerebri.

Authors:  Pietro Spennato; Claudio Ruggiero; Raffaele Stefano Parlato; Maria Consiglio Buonocore; Antonio Varone; Emilio Cianciulli; Giuseppe Cinalli
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Analysis of the outpatient lumbar puncture service in a tertiary hospital.

Authors:  J Lambe; J Redmond
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Long-Term Results of Optic Nerve Sheath Fenestration for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Earlier Intervention Favours Improved Outcomes.

Authors:  Stacy L Pineles; Nicholas J Volpe
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2013-01-29

6.  Gliomatosis cerebri or benign intracranial hypertension?

Authors:  P Weston; J Lear
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Meta-Analysis of CSF Diversion Procedures and Dural Venous Sinus Stenting in the Setting of Medically Refractory Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  S R Satti; L Leishangthem; M I Chaudry
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Benign intracranial hypertension: a cause of CSF rhinorrhoea.

Authors:  D Clark; P Bullock; T Hui; J Firth
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 9.  Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (pseudotumor cerebri).

Authors:  Michael Wall
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.081

10.  Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (pseudotumor cerebri): recognition, treatment, and ongoing management.

Authors:  Matthew J Thurtell; Michael Wall
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.