Literature DB >> 33925628

The Influence of Environmental Conditions on Intake Behavior and Activity by Feedlot Steers Fed Corn or Barley-Based Diets.

Hannah M DelCurto-Wyffels1, Julia M Dafoe2, Cory T Parsons2, Darrin L Boss2, Timothy DelCurto1, Samuel A Wyffels2, Megan L Van Emon1, Janice G P Bowman1.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the influence of diet and environmental conditions on intake behavior and activity of feedlot steers. Feedlot rations used were comprised of a main concentrate: (1) corn or (2) barley. A GrowSafe system measured individual animal intake and behavior and HOBO accelerometers measured steer standing time. An Onset weather station collected on site weather data. Steer daily intake displayed a diet by temperature class interaction (p ≤ 0.05). Relative temperature change had no effect on variation in intake (p = 0.60); however, diet influenced variation of intake (p < 0.01), where corn-fed steers had a greater coefficient of variation (CV) than barley-fed steers (21.89 ± 1.46 vs. 18.72 ± 1.46%). Time spent eating (min d-1) and eating rate (g min-1) both displayed a diet by temperature class interaction (p ≤ 0.05). Diet did not affect steer lying activity (p ≥ 0.12), however, time spent lying (min d-1) and frequency of lying bouts (bouts d-1) increased on relatively cold days while the duration of lying bouts (min bout-1; p < 0.01) decreased. Short-term environmental temperature changes interacted with diet influencing feedlot beef cattle intake behavior; however, they did not interact with basal diet in respect to steer activity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  barley; behavior; corn; environment; intake; steer

Year:  2021        PMID: 33925628     DOI: 10.3390/ani11051261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animals (Basel)        ISSN: 2076-2615            Impact factor:   2.752


  22 in total

1.  Maintenance requirements of beef cattle as affected by season on different planes of nutrition.

Authors:  C P Birkelo; D E Johnson; H P Phetteplace
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Test duration for growth, feed intake, and feed efficiency in beef cattle using the GrowSafe System.

Authors:  Z Wang; J D Nkrumah; C Li; J A Basarab; L A Goonewardene; E K Okine; D H Crews; S S Moore
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Cold stress as it affects animal production.

Authors:  B A Young
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Starch digestion and utilization in ruminants.

Authors:  E R Orskov
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Lying behavior: assessing within- and between-herd variation in free-stall-housed dairy cows.

Authors:  K Ito; D M Weary; M A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 6.  Accelerometer systems as tools for health and welfare assessment in cattle and pigs - A review.

Authors:  Jose M Chapa; Kristina Maschat; Michael Iwersen; Johannes Baumgartner; Marc Drillich
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Associations between lying behavior and lameness in Canadian Holstein-Friesian cows housed in freestall barns.

Authors:  L Solano; H W Barkema; E A Pajor; S Mason; S J LeBlanc; C G R Nash; D B Haley; D Pellerin; J Rushen; A M de Passillé; E Vasseur; K Orsel
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 8.  Invited review: sensors to support health management on dairy farms.

Authors:  C J Rutten; A G J Velthuis; W Steeneveld; H Hogeveen
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Effects of Climatic Conditions on the Lying Behavior of a Group of Primiparous Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Emanuela Tullo; Gabriele Mattachini; Elisabetta Riva; Alberto Finzi; Giorgio Provolo; Marcella Guarino
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.