Daniele Bongetta1, Fulvio Tartara2, Fabio Pagella3, Teresa Somma4, Marilou Cavaliere1,5, Giuseppe Di Perna6, Francesco Zenga6, Fabio Cofano7, Diego Garbossa6,7, Cesare Zoia8. 1. Neurosurgery Unit, Ospedale Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, 20131 Milano, Italy. 2. Neurosurgery Unit, Istituto Clinico Città Studi, 20131 Milano, Italy. 3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy. 4. Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 80131 Napoli, Italy. 5. Neurosurgery Department, University degli Studi Milano Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy. 6. Neurosurgery Unit, AOC Città della Scienza e della Salute, 10127 Turin, Italy. 7. Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, 10127 Turin, Italy. 8. Neurosurgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Abstract
(1) Background: Despite many surgical and technological advances, pituitary adenoma surgery is still burdened by non-negligible rates of incomplete tumor resection, mainly due to difficulties in differentiating pathology from normal pituitary tissue. Some fluorescent agents have been recently investigated as intraoperative contrast agents in pituitary surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the actual knowledge about the usefulness of such fluorophores with a particular focus on both the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics issues of the pituitary gland. (2) Methods: We reviewed the current literature about fluorophores use in pituitary surgery and reported the first fully endoscopic experience with fluorescein. (3) Results: The studies investigating 5-ALA use reported contrasting results. ICG showed encouraging results, although with some specificity issues in identifying pathological tissue. Low-dose fluorescein showed promising results in differentiating pathology from normal pituitary tissue. Apart from the dose and timing of administration, both the fluorophores' volume of distribution and the histological variability of the interstitial space and vascular density played a crucial role in optimizing intraoperative contrast enhancement. (4) Conclusions: Both pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics issues determine the potential usefulness of fluorophores in pituitary surgery. ICG and fluorescein showed the most promising results, although further studies are needed.
(1) Background: Despite many surgical and technological advances, pituitary adenoma surgery is still burdened by non-negligible rates of incomplete tumor resection, mainly due to difficulties in differentiating pathology from normal pituitary tissue. Some fluorescent agents have been recently investigated as intraoperative contrast agents in pituitary surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the actual knowledge about the usefulness of such fluorophores with a particular focus on both the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics issues of the pituitary gland. (2) Methods: We reviewed the current literature about fluorophores use in pituitary surgery and reported the first fully endoscopic experience with fluorescein. (3) Results: The studies investigating 5-ALA use reported contrasting results. ICG showed encouraging results, although with some specificity issues in identifying pathological tissue. Low-dose fluorescein showed promising results in differentiating pathology from normal pituitary tissue. Apart from the dose and timing of administration, both the fluorophores' volume of distribution and the histological variability of the interstitial space and vascular density played a crucial role in optimizing intraoperative contrast enhancement. (4) Conclusions: Both pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics issues determine the potential usefulness of fluorophores in pituitary surgery. ICG and fluorescein showed the most promising results, although further studies are needed.
Entities:
Keywords:
5-ALA; ICG; fluorescein; pituitary surgery
Authors: Lisa Margarete Neumann; Kerim Beseoglu; Philipp Joerg Slotty; Brigitte Senger; Marcel Alexander Kamp; Daniel Hänggi; Hans Jakob Steiger; Jan Frederick Cornelius Journal: Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 3.631
Authors: Juan Antonio Simal Julián; Pablo Sanromán Álvarez; Pablo Miranda Lloret; Carlos Botella Asunción Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2016-05-14 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Jun W Jeon; Steve S Cho; Shayoni Nag; Love Buch; John Pierce; YouRong S Su; Nithin D Adappa; James N Palmer; Jason G Newman; Sunil Singhal; John Y K Lee Journal: Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Ja Eun Kim; Hye Rim Cho; Wen Jun Xu; Ji Young Kim; Sung Kwon Kim; Seung-Ki Kim; Sung-Hye Park; Hyeonjin Kim; Se-Hoon Lee; Seung Hong Choi; Sunghyouk Park; Chul-Kee Park Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2015-08-21
Authors: Pietro Zeppa; Raffaele De Marco; Matteo Monticelli; Armando Massara; Andrea Bianconi; Giuseppe Di Perna; Stefania Greco Crasto; Fabio Cofano; Antonio Melcarne; Michele Maria Lanotte; Diego Garbossa Journal: Brain Sci Date: 2022-04-26
Authors: Elizaveta I Kozlikina; Kanamat T Efendiev; Andrey Yu Grigoriev; Olesia Y Bogdanova; Igor S Trifonov; Vladimir V Krylov; Victor B Loschenov Journal: Bioengineering (Basel) Date: 2022-01-28