| Literature DB >> 33925173 |
Carmen-Alina Bolea1, Mihaela Cotârleț1, Elena Enachi1, Vasilica Barbu1, Nicoleta Stănciuc1.
Abstract
Two multi-functional powders, in terms of anthocyanins from black rice (Oryza sativa L.) and lactic acid bacteria (Lactobacillus paracasei, L. casei 431®) were obtained through co-microencapsulation into a biopolymer matrix composed of milk proteins and inulin. Two extracts were obtained using black rice flour as a raw material and hot water and ethanol as solvents. Both powders (called P1 for aqueous extract and P2 for ethanolic extract) proved to be rich sources of valuable bioactives, with microencapsulation efficiency up to 80%, both for anthocyanins and lactic acid bacteria. A higher content of anthocyanins was found in P1, of 102.91 ± 1.83 mg cyanindin-3-O-glucoside (C3G)/g dry weight (DW) when compared with only 27.60 ± 17.36 mg C3G/g DW in P2. The morphological analysis revealed the presence of large, thin, and fragile structures, with different sizes. A different pattern of gastric digestion was observed, with a highly protective effect of the matrix in P1 and a maximum decrease in anthocyanins of approximatively 44% in P2. In intestinal juice, the anthocyanins decreased significantly in P2, reaching a maximum of 97% at the end of digestion; whereas in P1, more than 45% from the initial anthocyanins content remained in the microparticles. Overall, the short-term storage stability test revealed a release of bioactive from P2 and a decrease in P1. The viable cells of lactic acid bacteria after 21 days of storage reached 7 log colony forming units (CFU)/g DW.Entities:
Keywords: anthocyanins; antioxidant activity; encapsulation efficiency; microencapsulation; probiotic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33925173 PMCID: PMC8125259 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26092579
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Biologically active compounds of the two extracts obtained from black rice flour.
| Type of Extract | Total Antochyanins, mg C3G/g DW | Total Polyphenols, mg Gallic Acid Equivalents (GAE)/g DW | Total Flavonoids, mg EC/g DW | 2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aqueous extract | 134.18 ± 0.02 b | 18.43 ± 0.18 b | 19.47 ± 0.50 b | 75.73 ± 1.28 b |
| Ethanolic extract | 174.90 ± 4.66 a | 453.36 ± 6.21 a | 428.71 ± 21.32 a | 88.92 ± 1.26 a |
On each column, means that do not share the same letter (a,b) are statistically different at p < 0.01 based on the Tukey test.
Bioactive profile of the powders (P1–the powder that contains the extract obtained by aqueous extraction; P2–the powder that contains the extract obtained by ethanolic extraction).
| Powders | Total Anthocyanins, mg C3G/g DW | Total Polyphenols, mg GAE/g DW | Total Flavonoids, mg Catechin Equivalents (CE)/g DW | ABTS, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P2 | 27.60 ± 17.36 b | 113.85 ± 1.92 b | 50.97 ± 5.70 a | 82.50 ± 0.29 b |
| P1 | 102.91 ± 1.83 a | 200.70 ± 8.34 a | 39.77 ± 5.37 b | 87.92 ± 0.54 a |
Means that do not share a letter (a,b) on column are significantly different.
Figure 1The digestion profile of anthocyanins (%) after in vitro digestion in simulated gastric (a) and duodenal juices (b) for powders P1 (♦) and P2 (■).
Figure 2Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of the native microencapsulated powders: Powder II—native state (a) and with fluorophore (c); Powder I—in native state (b) and with fluorophore (d).
The storage stability test of the powders (P1-the powder that contains the extract obtained by aqueous extraction; P2-the powder that contains the extract obtained by ethanolic extraction).
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| |
| Total anthocyanins, mg C3G/DW | 27.60 ± 9.75 a | 27.86 ± 3.83 a | 28.38 ± 3.89 a | 28.96 ± 3.68 a |
| Total polyphenols, mg GAE/ DW | 113.85 ± 1.92 a | 118.40 ± 4.28a | 123.41 ± 4.60 a | 123.73 ± 2.26 a |
| Total flavonoids, mg EC/g DW | 50.97 ± 5.70 b | 53.61 ± 2.32 ab | 63.34 ± 1.40 ab | 65.16 ± 4.80 a |
| 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) % | 73.72 ± 1.39 a | 75 ± 4.15 a | 75.10 ± 1.57 a | 76.11 ± 0.25 a |
| ABTS % | 82.50 ± 0.29 b | 84.20 ± 1.10 ab | 84.40 ± 0.80 ab | 85.17 ± 0.78 a |
|
| ||||
| Total anthocyanins, mg C3G/DW | 102.91 ± 1.83 b | 119.27 ± 2.10 a | 97.64 ± 2.43 bc | 94.01 ± 6.94 c |
| Total polyphenols, mg GAE/ DW | 200.70 ± 8.34 a | 198.45 ± 8.92 a | 193.77 ± 2.3 a | 190.91 ± 1.43 a |
| Total flavonoids, mg EC/g DW | 39.77 ± 5.37 a | 39.26 ± 8.99 a | 38.93 ± 1.13 a | 37.79 ± 8.47 a |
| DPPH % | 80.27 ± 0,39 a | 80.22 ± 2.56 a | 80.11 ± 0.54 a | 80.06 ± 0.66 a |
| ABTS % | 87.92 ± 0.54 a | 85.46 ± 0.05 b | 84.19 ± 1.05 b | 84.09 ± 1.88 a |
On each column, means that do not share the same letter (a,b,c) are statistically different at p < 0.01 based on the Tukey test.