Literature DB >> 33924610

Feasibility of Non-Exposure Simple Suturing Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection in Comparison with Laparoscopic Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery for Gastric Subepithelial Tumors: Results of Two Independent Prospective Trials.

Bang Wool Eom1, Chan Gyoo Kim1, Myeong-Cherl Kook1, Hong Man Yoon1, Keun Won Ryu1, Young-Woo Kim1, Ji Yoon Rho1, Young-Il Kim1, Jong Yeul Lee1, Il Ju Choi1.   

Abstract

Recently, nonexposure simple suturing endoscopic full-thickness resection (NESS-EFTR) method was developed to avoid tumor exposure to the peritoneal cavity. The aim of this study is to compare the short-term outcomes of the NESS-EFTR method with those of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs). A prospective single-center trial of LECS for gastric SETs was performed from March 2012 to October 2013 with a separate prospective trial of NESS-EFTR performed from August 2015 to June 2017, enrolling 15 patients each. Among the 30 enrolled patients, 14 who underwent LECS and 11 who underwent NESS-EFTR were finally included in the analysis. The rate of complete resection and successful closure was 100% in both groups. The operating time was longer for NESS-EFTR group than for LECS (110 vs. 189 min; p < 0.0001). There were no postoperative complications except one case of transient fever in the NESS-EFTR group. One patient in the LECS group had peritoneal seeding of gastrointestinal stromal tumor at 17 months postoperatively, and there was no other recurrence. Although NESS-EFTR had long operating and procedure times, it was feasible for patients with gastric SETs requiring a nonexposure technique.

Entities:  

Keywords:  early gastric cancer; endoscopic full-thickness resection; laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery; nonexposure technique

Year:  2021        PMID: 33924610     DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.639


  4 in total

1.  Laparoscopic-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection of a large gastric schwannoma: A case report.

Authors:  Cheng-Hai He; Shi-Hua Lin; Zhen Chen; Wei-Min Li; Chun-Yan Weng; Yun Guo; Guo-Dong Li
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-04-27

2.  The Value of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Endoscopic Resection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Authors:  Jian-Wei Mi; Jia-Qi Wang; Jie Liu; Li-Xian Zhang; Hong-Wei Du; Dong-Qiang Zhao
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-09-02

3.  Surgical Resection Is Still Better Than Endoscopic Resection for Patients With 2-5 cm Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Han Li; Qinfeng Xu; Liang Shang; Ronghua Zhang; Chen Li; Mengdi Fu; Wandi Xu; Jianfeng Chen; Jin Liu; Leping Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Excellent oncological outcomes besides short-term safety of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Authors:  Hiroki Harada; Manabu Ohashi; Naoki Hiki; Junko Fujisaki; Toshiaki Hirasawa; Yorimasa Yamamoto; Rie Makuuchi; Satoshi Ida; Masaru Hayami; Koshi Kumagai; Takeshi Sano; Souya Nunobe
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-09-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.