| Literature DB >> 33924445 |
Rauf Foroutan1, Seyed Jamaleddin Peighambardoust1, Seyed Hadi Peighambardoust2, Mirian Pateiro3, Jose M Lorenzo3,4.
Abstract
Activated carbon prepared fromEntities:
Keywords: activated carbon; aqueous solution; cationic dye; isothermal models; magnetic nanoparticles
Year: 2021 PMID: 33924445 PMCID: PMC8068907 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26082241
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1(a) Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis for ACL and ACL/Fe3O4 magnetic nanocomposites before and after CV dye adsorption process; and (b) Vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) analysis for Fe3O4 and ACL/Fe3O4 magnetic nanocomposites.
Figure 2Nitrogen adsorption-desorption analysis for ACL and ACL/Fe3O4 magnetic nanocomposite samples.
Figure 3SEM, Map and EDX analyzes for: (a–c) ACL; (d–f) ACL/Fe3O4 magnetic nanocomposite; (g) ACL after CV dye adsorption, and (h) ACL/Fe3O4 magnetic nanocomposite after CV dye adsorption.
Figure 4(a) The effect of pH on the surface loads of adsorbents; (b) The effect of pH on the efficiency of the adsorption process (temperature 25 °C, contact time 60 min, adsorbent dose 1.25 g/L, CV dye concentration 10 mg/L), and (c) the mechanism of the CV dye adsorption process in the acidic and alkaline pH ranges.
Figure 5(a) contact time effect (pH = 9, temperature 25 °C, adsorbent dose 1.25 g/L, initial CV concentration 10 mg/L), Nonlinear relationship of PFO, PSO and intraparticle diffusion kinetic models for (b) ACL, and (c) ACL/Fe3O4 magnetic nanocomposite, and (d) linear relationship of Weber-Morris model for ACL and ACL/Fe3O4 magnetic nanocomposite.
Kinetics constants and parameters determined using kinetic models for the adsorption process.
| Kinetic Model | Adsorbent | |
|---|---|---|
| ACL | ACL/Fe3O4 | |
| Pseudo-first order | ||
| qe cal | 7.51 | 7.808 |
| KP1 | 0.0608 | 0.0819 |
| R2 | 0.9151 | 0.9484 |
| RMSE | 0.5142 | 0.3687 |
| Pseudo-second order | ||
| qe.cal | 8.545 | 8.648 |
| KP2s | 0.009 | 0.0138 |
| R2 | 0.9664 | 0.9730 |
| RMSE | 0.3235 | 0.2666 |
| Elovich equation | ||
| α (mg/g min) | 2.049 | 4.34 |
| β (g/mg) | 0.6328 | 0.7057 |
| R2 | 0.9642 | 0.9156 |
| RMSE | 0.3337 | 0.4719 |
| Intraparticle diffusion | ||
| Ki,1 (mg/g min1/2) | 1.0021 | 1.0836 |
| I1 (mg/g) | 0.7179 | 1.0916 |
| R2 | 0.9887 | 0.9965 |
| Ki,2 (mg/g min1/2) | 0.8855 | 0.7777 |
| I2 (mg/g) | 0.6332 | 2.4091 |
| R2 | 0.9807 | 0.954 |
| Ki,3 (mg/g min1/2) | 0.0247 | 0.0081 |
| I3 (mg/g) | 7.4444 | 7.8024 |
| R2 | 0.9495 | 0.9696 |
Figure 6(a,b) Effect of initial CV concentration on efficiency and adsorption capacity (pH = 9, contact time for ACL and ACL/Fe3O4 magnetic nanocomposite 80 and 60 min, temperature 25 °C, adsorbent dose 1.25 g/L), Nonlinear relationship of isotherm models for CV dye adsorption process using (c) ACL and (d) ACL/Fe3O4 magnetic nanocomposite. Data are mean of triplicate measurements. (a,b) the error bars indicate SD values.
Constant isotherms and parameters determined for the CV dye adsorption process.
| Models | Adsorbent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | ACL | ACL/Fe3O4 | |
| Langmuir | qm (mg/g) | 23.64 | 35.31 |
| KL (L/mg) | 1.469 | 1.366 | |
| RL | 0.008–0.063 | 0.009–0.68 | |
| R2 | 0.9704 | 0.9826 | |
| RMSE | 1.122 | 1.435 | |
| Freundlich | n | 6.5 | 4.595 |
| Kf (mg/g (L/mg)1/n) | 13.78 | 18.25 | |
| R2 | 0.78 | 0.891 | |
| Dubinin–Radushkevich (D–R) | RMSE | 3.06 | 3.591 |
| E (kJ/mol) | 1.972 | 2.364 | |
| qm (mg/g) | 22.53 | 31.91 | |
| β (mol2/J2) | 1.285 × 10−7 | 8.969 × 10−8 | |
| R2 | 0.9838 | 0.8828 | |
| Temkin | RMSE | 0.8293 | 3.723 |
| bT (kJ/mol) | 0.837 | 0.45 | |
| AT (L/g) | 94.77 | 30.79 | |
| R2 | 0.8415 | 0.9737 | |
| RMSE | 2.597 | 1.904 | |
Figure 7Effect of adsorbent dose on (a) adsorption efficiency, and (b) adsorption capacity (pH = 9, temperature 25 °C, initial CV dye concentration 10 mg /L, contact time for ACL and ACL/Fe3O4 magnetic nanocomposite 80 and 60 min, respectively). Data are mean of triplicate measurements and error bars indicate SD values.
Figure 8(a) The effect of temperature on the adsorption efficiency (pH = 9, contact time for ACL and ACL/Fe3O4 magnetic nanocomposite 80 and 60 min, respectively, adsorbent dose for ACL and ACL/Fe3O4 magnetic nanocomposite 2 and 1.25 g/L, respectively, initial dye concentration of 10 mg/L); (b) the linear relation of van’t Hoff equation to determine thermodynamic parameters. Data are mean of triplicate measurements. (a) error bars indicate SD values.
Thermodynamic parameters for the CV dye adsorption process.
| Adsorbent | T (°C) | ΔG° (KJ/mol) | ΔH° (KJ/mol) | ΔS° (J/mol·K) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACL | 25 | −9.011 | −45.382 | −120.594 |
| 30 | −8.958 | |||
| 35 | −8.551 | |||
| 40 | −8.071 | |||
| 45 | −6.793 | |||
| 50 | -6.128 | |||
| ACL/Fe3O4 | 25 | −10.117 | −56.901 | −154.915 |
| 30 | −10.241 | |||
| 35 | −9.793 | |||
| 40 | −8.666 | |||
| 45 | −7.105 | |||
| 50 | −6.742 |
Comparison of ACL adsorption capacity and ACL/Fe3O4 magnetic nanocomposite with other adsorbents used in CV removal process.
| Adsorbent | qe (mg/g) CV Dye | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Magnetite alginate | 37.5 | [ |
| P(AAm-MA)/MMT | 20.36 | [ |
| Starch-g-poly (acrylic acid)/ZnSe | 10 | [ |
| Poly (acrylamide)-kaolin composite hydrogel | 23.8 | [ |
| Polyvinyl alcohol/agar/maltodextrin | 19.17 | [ |
| Guar gum/bentonite bionanocomposite | 167.929 | [ |
| Soil-silver nanocomposite | 1.918 | [ |
| Activated carbon | 35.64 | [ |
| NaOH-modified rice husk | 44.876 | [ |
| Leaf biomass of | 4.14 | [ |
| TLAC/Chitosan composite | 0.269–2.375 | [ |
| Chitin nanowhiskers | 59.52 | [ |
| AC-Fe2O3·NPLs | 16.5 | [ |
| Chitin-psyllium based aerogel | 227.11 | [ |
| Poly(benzofuran-co-arylacetic acid)-FA | 25.10 | [ |
| Azolla and fig leaves modified with magnetite iron oxide nanoparticles | 25 | [ |
| Solid waste of rosewater extraction | 78.24 | [ |
| 54.7 | [ | |
| ACL | 23.64 | This study |
| ACL/Fe3O4 magnetic nanocomposite | 35.31 | This study |
Figure 9A schematic illustration of the productions process and structure of ACL/Fe3O4 magnetic nanocomposite.